Bilingual Education Laws in the United States: A Historical Overview, Exams of English Language

A historical overview of key legal developments in bilingual education in the united states. It outlines landmark supreme court cases, federal legislation, and significant court rulings that have shaped the landscape of bilingual education policy. The document highlights the evolution of legal frameworks from the 14th amendment to the no child left behind act, emphasizing the ongoing debate surrounding bilingual education and the rights of language minority students.

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 03/16/2025

Upstudy
Upstudy 🇺🇸

2.8

(9)

14K documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
BILINGUAL PROGRAMS LAWS
The 14th Amendment of 1868 - ANSWER Cannot be denied benefits of
federally funded programs based on race, color or national origin
Meyer v. Nebraska 1923 USSC - ANSWER Meyer spoke to students in
German, Supreme Court overturned Nebraska law stating that it violated 14th
Amendment to limit individual rights
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - ANSWER Prohibits discrimination on basis of race,
color, or national origin in the operation of all federally assisted programs
Title VI allowed funds to be withheld from school districts that maintained
segregation or did not promote integration
1968 Bilingual Education Act - ANSWER Did not force schools to offer
bilingual programming but encouraged bilingual education for economically
disadvantaged language minority students
The Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974 - ANSWER Makes educational
institutions responsible for overcoming racial, linguistic, cultural learning
barriers
Lau v. Nichols 1974 USSC - ANSWER 800 Chinese students in San Francisco
schools argued they were forced to sink/swim
Reinforced that it was school district's responsibility to provide the necessary
programs and accommodations to children who do not speak English
1975-1981 Lau Remedies: promoted transitional bilingual education programs
Castaneda v. Pickard 1981 5th circuit - ANSWER Created guidelines: 1)
Theory: must be based on sound educational theory 2) Practice: must have
sufficient resources and personnel 3) Results: must prove to be effective
Plyler v. Doe 1982 USSC - ANSWER Free education no matter legal status of
children/parents
Schools cannot make public family's status
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Bilingual Education Laws in the United States: A Historical Overview and more Exams English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

BILINGUAL PROGRAMS LAWS

The 14th Amendment of 1868 - ANSWER Cannot be denied benefits of federally funded programs based on race, color or national origin Meyer v. Nebraska 1923 USSC - ANSWER Meyer spoke to students in German, Supreme Court overturned Nebraska law stating that it violated 14th Amendment to limit individual rights Civil Rights Act of 1964 - ANSWER Prohibits discrimination on basis of race, color, or national origin in the operation of all federally assisted programs Title VI allowed funds to be withheld from school districts that maintained segregation or did not promote integration 1968 Bilingual Education Act - ANSWER Did not force schools to offer bilingual programming but encouraged bilingual education for economically disadvantaged language minority students The Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974 - ANSWER Makes educational institutions responsible for overcoming racial, linguistic, cultural learning barriers Lau v. Nichols 1974 USSC - ANSWER 800 Chinese students in San Francisco schools argued they were forced to sink/swim Reinforced that it was school district's responsibility to provide the necessary programs and accommodations to children who do not speak English 1975 - 1981 Lau Remedies: promoted transitional bilingual education programs Castaneda v. Pickard 1981 5th circuit - ANSWER Created guidelines: 1) Theory: must be based on sound educational theory 2) Practice: must have sufficient resources and personnel 3) Results: must prove to be effective Plyler v. Doe 1982 USSC - ANSWER Free education no matter legal status of children/parents Schools cannot make public family's status

The 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) - ANSWER Under the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title III - replaced Bilingual Education Act with English only approach Did not officially ban bilingual programs but imposed high-stakes testing system that promoted the adoption of English-only instruction The DREAM Act - ANSWER This bill would provide conditional permanent residency of 6 years to certain immigrants of good moral character who (1) graduate from U.S. high schools, (2) arrived in the United States as minors, (3) lived in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill's enactment, and (4) complete two years in the military or two years at a four- year institution of higher learning. DACA - ANSWER Permanent residence for 2 years, IF (1) came to the United States before reaching your 16th birthday and under age of 31 as of June 15, 2012 (2) have continuously resided in the US since 2007 (3) are currently in school, have graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, have obtained a general education development (GED) certificate, or are an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States and (4) have no criminal background