Bio Ethics Exam 2, Exams of Bioethics

Various ethical issues related to bioethics, including virtue ethics, personhood, abortion, and reproductive technologies. It explores different views on when personhood begins, including at conception, quickening, viability, birth, and when higher cognitive function begins. It also discusses various court cases related to abortion and presents the basic pro-life argument against abortion. Additionally, it explains how different reproductive technologies work and raises moral concerns related to them.

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Available from 02/09/2024

EmmaMoss
EmmaMoss 🇬🇧

99 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Bio Ethics Exam 2
How does virtue ethics differ from other approaches to to ethics like deontology or
utilitarianism?
Virtue ethics is not so much concerned with what we should do but rather with how we
should be.
What are 2 positive features with virtue ethics that have prompted some to return to
virtue ethics?
-It provides more plausible appraisals of character than act-based views like Kant's
deontology and utilitarianism.
-It provides more inspiration to be good than act-based theories.
The difficulty with virtue ethics:
It may fail the determinacy requirement, which says that a moral should provide clear
guidance about what to do in most cases. It tells us how to be, but not what to do, which
we generally need the most guidance on. Virtue ethicists often respond to this by saying
if we need to know what to do, we can say an act is right if and only if the person doing
the act is acting virtuously.
Explain the view that personhood begins at conception and the difficulty with this view:
Biologically, this is when you have a distinct human individual with its own DNA. Also, it
is hard to fix a point when personhood begins at any other time during fetal
development.
Difficulty: Many find it difficult to believe that a single cell has the same moral status as
an adult human.
Explain the view that personhood begins at quickening (16-20 weeks of pregnancy) and
the difficulty with this view:
People thought that when the soul entered the body, this would animate the body or
bring it to life, and the result was evidenced by the baby's activity.
Problem: Makes fetal personhood depend on factors external to the fetus-- in this case,
how sensitive the mother is to the baby's activity.
Explain the view that personhood begins at viability (22-24 weeks but in rare cases, 20
weeks) and the difficulty with this view:
One might think this is when the baby has a life of its own and so becomes a subject of
moral and legal protection.
Problem: It makes personhood depend on the current level of technology. As
technology has improved, the viability point has become earlier in gestation.
Explain the view that personhood begins at birth and the difficulty with this view:
You now clearly have a life of your own. You cry and make your presence known.
Problem: It makes personhood depend on factors external to the baby, such as how
active the mother was during pregnancy, how your mother carried you, etc. If your
mother is more active, you might be born a week earlier than you would if your mother
was more sedentary.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Bio Ethics Exam 2 and more Exams Bioethics in PDF only on Docsity!

How does virtue ethics differ from other approaches to to ethics like deontology or utilitarianism? Virtue ethics is not so much concerned with what we should do but rather with how we should be. What are 2 positive features with virtue ethics that have prompted some to return to virtue ethics? -It provides more plausible appraisals of character than act-based views like Kant's deontology and utilitarianism. -It provides more inspiration to be good than act-based theories. The difficulty with virtue ethics: It may fail the determinacy requirement, which says that a moral should provide clear guidance about what to do in most cases. It tells us how to be, but not what to do, which we generally need the most guidance on. Virtue ethicists often respond to this by saying if we need to know what to do, we can say an act is right if and only if the person doing the act is acting virtuously. Explain the view that personhood begins at conception and the difficulty with this view: Biologically, this is when you have a distinct human individual with its own DNA. Also, it is hard to fix a point when personhood begins at any other time during fetal development. Difficulty: Many find it difficult to believe that a single cell has the same moral status as an adult human. Explain the view that personhood begins at quickening (16-20 weeks of pregnancy) and the difficulty with this view: People thought that when the soul entered the body, this would animate the body or bring it to life, and the result was evidenced by the baby's activity. Problem: Makes fetal personhood depend on factors external to the fetus-- in this case, how sensitive the mother is to the baby's activity. Explain the view that personhood begins at viability (22-24 weeks but in rare cases, 20 weeks) and the difficulty with this view: One might think this is when the baby has a life of its own and so becomes a subject of moral and legal protection. Problem: It makes personhood depend on the current level of technology. As technology has improved, the viability point has become earlier in gestation. Explain the view that personhood begins at birth and the difficulty with this view: You now clearly have a life of your own. You cry and make your presence known. Problem: It makes personhood depend on factors external to the baby, such as how active the mother was during pregnancy, how your mother carried you, etc. If your mother is more active, you might be born a week earlier than you would if your mother was more sedentary.

Explain the view that personhood begins when higher cognitive function begins and the problem with this view: You become a person when you develop such capacities as self-consciousness, the ability to reason and communicate, and others. These functions don't fully appear until several months after birth. The most common view of sophisticated pro-choice advocates. Why think so? You can't really live a life without these capacities. You can't feel emotions, make plans, interact with people without them. Problem: Does it permit infanticide? Basic holdings of Roe Vs. Wade (1973): Legalized abortion on demand, but also tried to balance the mother's interests against the fetus'. 1st trimester: abortion is fairly unrestricted and women's rights are at their strongest. 2nd trimester: abortion is still permissible for any reason but states can regulate the practice somewhat. 3rd trimester: Fetus' rights become stronger and states can regulate abortion more stringently or even ban it entirely (except when necessary for mother's health.) Court felt that by the third trimester the fetus had reached viability and had a life worth protecting at that point. Basic holding of Webster v. Reproductive services (1989): Essentially did away with Roe v. Wade's trimester system. Allowed states to ban abortion after the point of viability, whenever that occurs and however that changes as technology develops. Basic holding of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992): Set up the "undue burden" standard for supreme court scrutiny of abortion regulation. States cannot enact laws that impose an undue burden on a woman seeking an abortion prior to the point of fetal viability. Basic holding of Gonzales v. Carhart (2007): The supreme court upheld The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (2003) after being challenged in 2004. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act is a federal law that prohibits doctors from partially delivering a live baby and then killing the baby. Gonzales v. Carhart upheld this law. According to Thompson, whats the basic pro-life argument against abortion?

  1. The fetus, as a person, has a right to life.
  2. The mother as a person has a right to control what happens in and to her body.
  3. The right to life outweighs the right to control what happens in and to one's body.
  4. Thus, abortion is wrong. Explain Thomson's case of the violinist? What does this show about the morality of abortion?

If you kill someone, you deprive that person of a future like ours, and that's why killing is wrong. Cases of Marquis used to justify the most plausible story for what is wrong with killing someone: FLO explains why killing is the worst of all crimes, why it would be wrong to kill an alien, why it would be wrong to kill a temporary comatose person. FLO explains why it would NOT be wrong to kill a permanently comatose person. The Argument from Interests Objection:

  1. For it to be wrong to deprive a fetus of its FLO, a fetus must take an interest in its FLO.
  2. A fetus does not take an interest in its FLO.
  3. So, it's not wrong to deprive a fetus of its FLO. Marquis' response to the Argument from Interests: One can have an interest in one's FLO even if one doesn't take an interest in its FLO ex: (temporarily comatose person). The Equality Objection to Marquis' view:
  4. If the FLO account were correct, we should punish child killers more severely than people who kill adults.
  5. But we do not do that.
  6. So the FLO account is not correct. Marquis' response to Equality Objection:
  7. We do think that killing children is worse than killing adults,
  8. But we don't punish child killers more because it would be unworkable to apportion punishment based on how much FLO the victim had. The Contraception Objection to Marquis' view:
  9. If the FLO account were correct, it would be wrong to use contraceptives.
  10. It's not wrong to use contraceptives
  11. So the FLO account is incorrect. Marquis' response to Contraception Objection: We have no moral obligation to merely potential beings. The zygote that would have been formed had one not used contraceptives (or abstained from sex), as a merely potential entity, has no FLO or claim on us. Only actual beings can have a FLO. The fetus is an actual being. Explain how In Vitro Fertilization works (IVF): Sperm and egg cells are harvested from a man and a woman and put together in a lab to create a zygote. The embryo is then implanted in a woman's uterus to gestate. -usually, multiple embryos are created and implanted in the woman to increase the odds that one will implant.

-higher incidence of multiple births -often more embryos are created than are used; excess ones are frozen for later use. Estimates vary, but there are at least several hundred thousand frozen embryos in the US alone and many are considered "abandoned." Explain how Artificial Insemination works: 2 types: -Artificial Insemination Homologous (AIH): the man from whom the sperm comes will also be the father of the baby. -Artificial Insemination Donor (AID): the man from whom the sperm comes will not be involved in raising the child; usually an anonymous donor. Relatively low-tech procedure in which sperm are directly placed beyond the woman's cervix in her uterus or in or near her fallopian tubes. A tube and syringe are used. Explain how Ova Donation works: The donor is given hormones to hyper-stimulate ovulation and then the eggs are removed via a minor surgical procedure. Possible side effects: nausea, hot flashes, sore breasts, weight gain, ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome. Explain how Surrogacy works: When a woman carries a baby for another couple and then gives the baby to them once the baby is born. 2 types:

  • Surrogate Mothering: the surrogate furnishes the ovum and carries the baby. Surrogate is impregnated either by artificial insemination or by IVF. -Gestational Surrogacy: the embryo is biologically unrelated to the surrogate; she only carries the baby. Embryo created by IVF. Explain how Cloning works: -An animal's ovum has its nucleus removed so that it is essentially just a shell. -a cell from another animal of that kind is placed next to the ovum or the DNA from the cell is placed directly into the ovum -electrical pulses are introduced which can stimulate the ovum to begin dividing and behaving like an embryo -the embryo is the implanted in a surrogate female animal -the animal that is born in an identical twin of the animal that furnished the DNA to the enucleated ovum 3 moral concerns with cloning:
  1. It is dangerously unsafe (reproductively)
  2. It detracts from the uniqueness and dignity of individual people (reproductive)
  3. Breakdown of the traditional family (reproductive)
  4. Reproduction without sex
  5. Is it killing a person for "spare parts?" (therapeutic) 3 moral concerns with surrogacy: