Black Holes - Part III Mathematical Tripos Exam Paper, Exams of Mathematics

Exam questions from part iii of the mathematical tripos focusing on the topic of black holes. The questions cover a range of concepts, including static spacetimes, kruskal extensions, penrose diagrams, and the laws of black hole mechanics. It is useful for students studying general relativity and black hole physics, providing challenging problems that require a deep understanding of the subject matter. The exam paper includes questions on constructing kruskal extensions, analyzing null geodesics, and proving the first law of black hole mechanics. It also explores the properties of killing horizons and the thermodynamics of black holes, offering a comprehensive assessment of the student's knowledge.

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Uploaded on 09/06/2025

douglas-cronkite
douglas-cronkite 🇬🇧

1 document

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MAMA/311, NST3AS/311, MAAS/311
MAT3
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III
Tuesday 4 June 2024 9:00 am to 12:00 pm
PAPER 311
BLACK HOLES
Before you begin please read these instructions carefully
Candidates have THREE HOURS to complete the written examination.
Attempt no more than THREE questions.
There are FOUR questions in total.
The questions carry equal weight.
STATIONERY REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Cover sheet None
Treasury tag
Script paper
Rough paper
You may not start to read the questions
printed on the subsequent pages until
instructed to do so by the Invigilator.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Black Holes - Part III Mathematical Tripos Exam Paper and more Exams Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

MAMA/311, NST3AS/311, MAAS/

MAT

MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III

Tuesday 4 June 2024 9:00 am to 12:00 pm

PAPER 311

BLACK HOLES

Before you begin please read these instructions carefully

Candidates have THREE HOURS to complete the written examination.

Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight.

STATIONERY REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Cover sheet None Treasury tag Script paper Rough paper

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

(a) Define what it means for a spacetime to be static and explain how to introduce coordinates in such a spacetime so that the metric takes the form ds^2 = g 00 (x)dt^2 + gij (x)dxidxj^ with g 00 < 0.

(b) Explain carefully how to construct the Kruskal extension of the Schwarzschild space- time. Let k be the Killing vector field associated with Schwarzschild time translations. What is k in Kruskal coordinates?

(c) On a large Kruskal diagram, show the following (with clear labelling):

(i) an ingoing radial null geodesic; (ii) an outgoing radial null geodesic; (iii) an extendible causal curve; (iv) an incomplete, inextendible, causal geodesic; (v) a complete, inextend- ible, causal geodesic.

[You may add a few words of explanation if necessary.]

(d) Alice, Bob and Carol are astronauts on a rocket at a fixed position with radius R > 2 M outside a Schwarzschild black hole. At a certain instant, Bob sets his watch to read 0 and Alice immediately leaves the rocket and falls radially into the black hole. Later, when Bob’s watch reads time T , he also leaves the rocket and falls radially into the black hole, along an identical trajectory. Carol, who is more sensible, remains in the rocket.

(i) As he crosses the event horizon, Bob looks at Alice. By how much is she redshifted?

[Hints. Argue that Bob’s trajectory is related to Alice’s trajectory by an isometry. Use this to relate the Kruskal coordinate VA, VB at which each crosses the horizon. Recall that an observer with velocity U a^ measures the energy of a photon with momentum P a^ to be −U · P .]

(ii) Carol observes Alice during her journey. Describe in two sentences what she sees.

Part III, Paper 311

(a) An isolated star undergoes gravitational collapse, during which a trapped surface forms. Explain why it is believed that a Kerr black hole will form. You should describe briefly suitable theorems and conjectures in your answer.

(b) Let N be a null hypersurface with normal na.

(i) Prove that na^ is tangent to null geodesics (the generators of N ).

(ii) Consider a null geodesic congruence containing the generators of N. Prove that the rotation of this congruence vanishes on N.

(c) The following generalization of the Kerr metric is a charged solution of the equations of motion of low energy string theory:

g = −

dt − a sin^2 θdϕ

dr^2 + sin^2 θ Σ

[

(r^2 + 2br + a^2 )dϕ − adt

] 2

  • Σdθ^2

where ∆ = r^2 − 2(m − b)r + a^2 Σ = r^2 + 2br + a^2 cos^2 θ

and m, a, b are constants. Assume that ∆ has real roots r± with r+ > r− and r+ > 0.

(i) Define new coordinates as follows:

dv = dt + A(r)dr dχ = dϕ + B(r)dr

where the functions A, B both have a simple pole at r = r+. Show that A, B can be chosen such that the metric in coordinates (v, r, θ, χ) can be analytically continued through r = r+.

[Hint: does smoothness of grχ suggest a relation between A and B?]

(ii) Prove that the surface r = r+ is a Killing horizon and calculate its angular velocity.

[Hint: look for a linear combination of Killing fields ξa^ such that ξμ|r=r+ has only a r- component.]

(iii) Calculate the surface gravity of this Killing horizon for a = 0.

Part III, Paper 311

(a) Prove the version of the first law of black hole mechanics that relates the mass and angular momentum of infalling matter to the change in the area of the event horizon. (You may assume Raychaudhuri’s equation, properties of Gaussian null coordinates and properties of the surface gravity.)

(b) In the Penrose process, a particle of energy E and angular momentum L falls into a Kerr black hole. Use the first and second laws of black hole mechanics to show that ΩH L ⩽ E. Explain why a particle with negative E cannot escape from the ergosphere.

(c) Explain why the discovery that black holes emit thermal radiation implies that the laws of black hole mechanics can be reinterpreted in thermodynamical terms. A radiating black hole shrinks, in violation of the second law of black hole mechanics. What assumption in the statement of the second law is violated by this process? Why does this shrinking not imply a violation of the second law of thermodynamics?

END OF PAPER

Part III, Paper 311