Burrow Giles Lithographic - Copyright Law - Lecture Slides, Slides of Law

These are the lecture slides of Copyright Law. Key important points are: Burrow Giles Lithographic, Sarony, Society, Important, Constitutional, Supreme Court, Bleistein, Donaldson, Copyright, Mezzotints Copyrightable

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/26/2013

saini
saini 🇮🇳

5

(1)

31 documents

1 / 24

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Burrow-Giles Lithographic
Society v. Sarony (1884) CB 29
What were the
2 important
constitutional
questions on
which the
Supreme Court
had to rule in
this case?
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18

Partial preview of the text

Download Burrow Giles Lithographic - Copyright Law - Lecture Slides and more Slides Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Burrow-Giles Lithographic Society v. Sarony (1884) CB 29

  • What were the 2 important constitutional questions on which the Supreme Court had to rule in this case? Docsity.com

Some other Photos by Napoleon Sarony

Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda (2d Cir. 1951) CB 51

• Were the plaintiff’s

mezzotints copyrightable,

according to Justice

Frank?

• Do you agree? Why or why

not? Docsity.com

COPYRIGHTABILITY

Two statutory requirements for copyright protection in s. 102(a)

    1. Original work of authorship
    1. Fixation

Learned Hand: Independent Creation Requirement

  • “.. .[I]f by some magic a man who had never known it were to compose anew Keats’ Ode On a Grecian Urn, he would bean “author,” and, if he copyrighted it, others might not copy that poem, though they might of course copy Keats.”
  • Sheldon v. MGM, 81 F.2d 49, 54 (2d Cir. 1936), aff’d, 309 U.S. 390 (1940)

Can “Dr. Nerd” Copyright...

-... a heretofore undiscovered and unpublished manuscript of a Shakespeare play that he found while exploring the stacks of Mullen Library?

In Bell v. Catalda, Justice Frank stated:

  • “A copyist’s bad eyesight or defective musculature, or a shock caused by a clap of thunder, may yield sufficiently distinguishable variations [to be considered original enough to be copyrighted]. Having hit on such a variation unintentionally, the “author” may adopt it as his own and copyright it.”

COPYRIGHTABILITY:

ORIGINALITY

REQUIREMENT

Two aspects:

  • (1) independent creation
  • (2) at least some minimal degree of creativity
  • See Feist , 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
    • CB p. 75

Copyright Office Regulation provides that some works are not copyrightable, including:

  • “Words and short phrases, such as names, titles, and slogans, familiar symbols or designs, mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering or coloring; mere listing of ingredients or contents.” – 37 C.F.R. § 202.1(a)

WORKS OF AUTHORSHIP

  • See s. 102(a) (1)-(8)
  • Overlapping?
  • Exclusive?

FIXATION

  • Like originality, fixation is required for a work to be copyrightable
  • It is a constitutional requirement - a work must be a “writing” to be copyrightable

FIXATION

  • Second requirement for copyrightability
  • Constitutional Requirement
  • Statutory Requirement

FIXATION REQUIREMENT

  • See also 17 U.S.C. § 101: “A work is “fixed” in a tangible medium of expression when its embodiment in a copy or phonorecord, by or under the authority of the author, is sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration. A work consisting of sounds, images, or both, that are being transmitted, is “fixed” for purposes of this title if a fixation of the work is being made simultaneously with its transmission”

SPORTING AND OTHER

EVENTS

  • Is the Macys Thanksgiving Day parade fixed?