







Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
How to determine the stereochemistry of organic compounds using the CIP (Cornforth- Ingold- Prelog) notation and Fischer projections. It covers the concept of stereocenters, priority rules for assigning stereochemistry, and the application of these rules to various organic compounds, including sugars. The document also includes examples and rules of thumb for assigning stereochemistry.
Typology: Exams
1 / 13
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!








The topics in this tutorial are covered in the textbook: Stryer, page 17, 43 & Ch. 11.1; Bruice, 4.5, 4.8 to 4.10, 20.1, 20.2, 20.10.
The purpose of this tutorial is to help you master the method of assigning Cahn-Ingold- Prelog notation for stereocentres that you will encounter in biological molecules. It is not an exhaustive review of the subject.
In organic chemistry there are molecules that can have exactly the same connections between atoms and yet still be different molecules. An example of this is a pair of enantiomers, two molecules that are mirror images of each other. In regular isomers we can easily designate different atomic connections in the name of the chemical, e.g. butane and isobutene are two different isomers where they have the same atoms but different bonding arrangements.
Pentane Isopentane (2-methylbutane)
Now let us consider pentanol. We might have isomers like n -pentanol and isopentanol (2-methyl-1-butanol).
Pentanol Isopentanol (2-methyl-1-butanol)
But the isopentanol shown above has two possible isomers. These isomers are the result of one of the carbon atoms having 4 different groups in a tetrahedral arrangement. There are actually two different ways that we can arrange these groups in 3-dimensions without changing the chemical bonding arrangements. These two compounds are called stereoisomers. The carbon atom with four different groups is called the stereocentre or chiral centre. In the case that 2 stereoisomers are also exact mirror images of each other (and this is always the case if there is only one stereocentre) then we call the two stereoisomers a pair of enantiomers. Below are the two stereoisomers of 2-methyl-1- butanol, note that they are enantiomers.
Plane of reflection
(S)-Isopentanol (S )-2-methyl-1-butanol
(R )-Isopentanol (R )-2-methyl-1-butanol
This tutorial assumes the following…
If you are unfamiliar with any of the above concepts you will be better able to benefit from this tutorial if you review them before proceeding. The references for each subject are from Bruice, 3 rd^ edition and Stryer, 5th^ edition. Bruice was the textbook used in chemistry 241.242 and Stryer is the textbook used in this course.
It is easy to denote structural isomers by using a chemical naming convention, but how can we express the exact arrangement of groups around a stereocentre? This exact arrangement is called the absolute configuration. We can describe the absolute configuration using the system developed by the scientists for which it was named. Cahn-Ingold-Prelog notation (hereafter called CIP notation) provides an unambiguous description of a stereoisomer of a compound.
There are two possible absolute configurations around any single stereocentre and each configuration will be labeled either R or S in the CIP notation system.
To decide which notation fits a given stereocentre we will take a tetrahedral stereocentre (SP 3 carbon is the most common example of a tetrahedral system in biochemistry) and examine the exact orientation of the groups relative to each other. We will apply the set of rules and determine the absolute configuration to be either R or S.
This will require an ability to rotate molecules in your head. Practice will be necessary.
That’s all there is to it. You must develop the skills for rotating molecules correctly on paper or in your head. Practice!
Let us return to the example of 2-methyl-1-butanol and develop the rules for assigning priority.
Figure 3. An enantiomer of 2-methyl-1-butanol with priorities assigned.
Three of the atoms attached to the stereocentre are carbon and we will have to consider each group in more detail to order these three carbons in priority. The fourth group is hydrogen. It is lower in priority than any carbon atom (1 AMU vs. 12 AMU) and so is assigned the lowest priority of 4.
We must consider the atoms attached to each of the carbon groups so that we can prioritize them. Two identical atoms are further prioritized in rank of the highest priority substituent on each. Let’s go through the three carbon atoms in question.
Atom #3: 3 hydrogen substituents Atom #2: 2 hydrogen and 1 carbon substituent Atom #1: 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen substituent
Atom #1 has the highest priority oxygen substituent (mass of O is 16 AMU), atom #2 is next in priority with the carbon substituent (mass is 12 AMU), and atom #3 is last in priority with only low priority hydrogen as its highest substituent.
Figure 4. Some example groups in order of priority (highest to lowest).
O OH
CH 3 HN NH 2
CH 3 H C
CH 3 OH H 2 C
OH H 3 C C CH 3
CH 3 OH
Highest (^) Lowest
H
What about double bonds? An aldehyde group has an oxygen and a hydrogen attached to the carbon atom while an alcohol group has an oxygen and two hydrogens attached to the carbon. Which is higher in priority?
Figure 5. Some groups with double bonds
C
Aldehyde (^) Alcohol
Alkene Alkane
Highest Lowest
We count each bond as a separate connection. So an aldehyde has two bonds to an oxygen atom and the alcohol has only one. Therefore the aldehyde is higher in priority. Similarly, an alkene carbon is higher in priority than an alkane carbon. Triple bonds are treated analogously
Figure 6. Groups with double and triple bonds. Relative priorities are in parentheses.
Aldehyde (2)
Alkene (4)
Alkene (3)
Ketone (1)
If two or more groups are the same element, then we examine the attached atoms. If they are also the same, we must examine the atoms attached to those atoms until we have a winner.
In biochemistry we will encounter this situation in the sugars. So let us now examine the case of glucose.
We can determine the CIP designation (R or S) directly from Fischer projection suing the following rules (adapted from Bruice, ch. 4.5).
After assigning the group priorities we will have three cases:
Case 1. The lowest priority group is on a vertical bond and is thus pointing away from you. We can therefore use standard CIP ordering. Move your finger in a circular motion around the stereocentre from the highest priority group to the next highest. If you moved clockwise it is R and if you moved counterclockwise it is S
Case 2. This case applies to sugars. The lowest priority group is on a horizontal bond and is thus pointing toward you. We must therefore use opposite CIP ordering (we are looking from the reverse direction that CIP ordering utilizes). Move your finger in a circular motion around the stereocentre from the highest priority group to the next highest. If you moved counterclockwise it is R and if you moved clockwise it is S.
Case 3. The lowest priority group is on a vertical bond and is thus pointing away from you. We can therefore use standard CIP ordering. Move your finger in a circular motion from the highest priority group to the next to the next (1 to 2 to 3). If you moved clockwise it is R and if you moved counterclockwise it is S
Case 4. The lowest priority group is on a horizontal bond and is thus pointing toward you. We must therefore use opposite CIP ordering (we are looking from the reverse direction that CIP ordering utilizes). Move your finger in a circular motion from the highest priority group to the next to the next (1 to 2 to 3). If you moved counterclockwise it is R and if you moved clockwise it is S.
Rule of Thumb : If the rotation of the circle formed by the three highest priority groups is clockwise then the assignment is R if the lowest priority group is vertical. Think of Vertical, Clockwise, R or VCR.
Vertical, Clockwise = R (VCR) Horizontal, Clockwise = S (HCS, HiCkupS) Vertical, Counterclockwise = S Horizontal, Counterclockwise = R
If any one of the first two elements of VCR is opposite then the R is opposite as well and is an S. If both are opposite (horizontal, counterclockwise) then the opposite of the opposite is the same and the R remains R.
Figure 8. Assigning CIP designations to Fischer projections. All of the below are R.
We have seen that the 2-carbon in glucose is in the R configuration. Let us now consider the 3-carbon. In the Fischer projection we will order the groups attached to the 3-carbon. The hydroxyl group is again the highest priority and the hydrogen group is again the lowest. Again, we have two carbon groups to prioritize based on their substituents.
The 2-carbon has a carbon, a hydrogen and an oxygen attached. the 4-carbon has a carbon, a hydrogen and an oxygen attached. We still have a tie.
In this complex situation we then consider what is attached to the groups attached to each carbon. Both hydrogens are identical, and both oxygens have a hydrogen attached and are also therefore identical. The tiebreaker will be what is attached to the carbon atom.
The 5-carbon is attached to the 4-carbon. It has a hydrogen, an oxygen and a carbon. The 1-carbon is attached to the 2-carbon. It is a aldehyde group and has two connections to an oxygen (double bond) and one connection to a hydrogen. The 1-carbon with C(O)(O)(H) is higher in priority than the 5-carbon C(C)(O)(H). So that means that the 2- carbon has higher priority groups attached to it than the 4-carbon. Therefore the 2-carbon is higher in priority than the 4-carbon.
So we will order them in priority as the oxygen, 2-carbon, 4-carbon and hydrogen.
Figure 9. Assigning the stereochemistry of the 3-carbon of glucose.
! "
! "
(^)
! "
(^)
Figure 11. Assigning the anomeric stereocentre in β - D -glucopyranose.
!
"
!
"
!
"
!
"
Figure 12. The Haworth projection of β - D -glucopyranose and assigned stereochemistry.
1 (anomeric) R (β)
2 R (D)
3 S (L)
4 S (D)
2
3
4
5
6
The acetal group will cause some confusion in assigning priorities for carbon groups near the acetal. Priorities will be clear using the established rules for the 1,2,3 and 5-carbons. The 4-carbon has some confusing issues.
In linear glucose we observe that the 3-carbon attached to the 4-carbon has a higher priority than the 5-carbon that is also attached to the 4-carbon. Work it out for yourself and convince yourself that this is true. However, the cyclic form now has an alkyl group attached to the oxygen group of the 5-carbon (it is now part of an acetal group) instead of the hydrogen (when it was a hydroxyl group). Does this change our priorities?
It does. Examine the two carbon groups in the cyclic molecule. Both groups start with a carbon atom and each carbon atom is attached to another carbon, a hydrogen and an oxygen group. So we are tied.
Figure 13. Analysis of the carbon groups for the 3-carbon and the 5-carbon. Both have the same priority so far.
1 2 3 4
5
6
2 3
4
CIP view of the 4-carbon of glucose
CIP Analysis of 3-carbon
CIP Analysis of 5-carbon
4
5
6
Tied
Now we will examine each of the attached groups in order of priority (oxygen first, then carbon) to see if any are higher in priority in a “sudden death” playoff. The moment we get a higher priority we declare a winner. So we will see if one of the oxygen groups is higher in priority. We will trace the molecular chain out from these higher priority groups until one of the oxygens wins or we see that both oxygens are identical. If they are identical then we will turn our attention to the next highest priority group, the carbon.
The oxygen on the 3-carbon is a hydroxyl group and has a hydrogen substituent. The oxygen on the 5-carbon now has a carbon substituent (because we formed an acetal when we closed the ring) and is higher in priority. We now can prioritize all 4 substituents and determine the CIP designation.
a)
OH (^) b)
c)
d)
e) O
f) H 2 N C C
g)
h)