


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
study done for candy and correlation with violence
Typology: Summaries
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



LONDON (AP) Willy Wonka would be horrified. Children who eat too much candy may be more likely to be arrested for violent behavior as adults, new research suggests. British experts studied more than 17,000 children born in 1970 for about four decades. Of the children who ate candies or chocolates daily at age 10, 69 percent were later arrested for a violent offense by the age of 34. Of those who didn't have any violent clashes, 42 percent ate sweets daily. The study was published in the October issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry. It was paid for by Britain's Economic and Social Research Council. The researchers said the results were interesting, but that more studies were needed to confirm the link. "It's not that the sweets themselves are bad, it's more about interpreting how kids make decisions," said Simon Moore of the University of Cardiff, one of the paper's authors. Moore said parents who consistently bribe their children into good behavior with candies and chocolates could be doing harm. That might prevent kids from learning how to defer gratification, leading to impulsive behavior and violence. Even after Moore and colleagues controlled for other variables like different parenting skills and varying social and economic backgrounds, they found a significant link between childhood consumption of sweets and violent behavior in adulthood. Previous studies have found better nutrition leads to better behavior, in both children and adults. Moore said his results were not strong enough to recommend parents stop giving their children candies and chocolates. "This is an incredibly complex area," he said. "It's not fair to blame it on the candy."
ANOTHER TAKE ON THIS…
Sweet enough already? “Lots of sweets makes kids thuggish adults,” said The Mirror today. The newspaper reports that research has found that more than two in three people (69%) with a violent record by the age of 34 had “scoffed confectionery every" day when they were 10 years old. The newspaper quoted experts who think that this aggression comes from not learning patience in childhood. The research, involving 17,500 people, is the first to look at adult violence in relation to childhood diet. However, there are other possible explanations for this link including the fact that difficult children might be given more sweets. It should be noted there was a high proportion of people who ate sweets every day in both the violent and non-violent groups. Also, it appears that less than 0.5% of children (about 81) in this study became violent offenders. Overall, this study on its own does not provide strong enough evidence to support media explanations for the supposed link, which would need more study through dedicated research. Regardless, common sense tells us that eating too many sweets is not good for children’s health.
Dr Simon Moore and colleagues from Cardiff University carried out this research. The study was funded by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council, and published in the peer- reviewed British Journal of Psychiatry.
This was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort study, the British Cohort Study. This research collected data on newborns at regular intervals from 1970 onwards. It followed 17,415 babies born in the UK in one particular week in April that year, and also
What does the NHS Knowledge Service make of this study? This analysis of the British Cohort Study has the advantage of a large sample size. As it is designed prospectively, it also avoids the chance of reverse causation, i.e. the possibility that in some way violent offending might determine dietary habit. However, there are limitations to this study, some of which are mentioned by the authors: