Causation Seminar Questions., Quizzes of Law of Torts

The Causation Seminar Questions document is part of the Law of Tort course (LAW209) for the 2024-25 academic year. It focuses on causation in fact and causation in law in negligence cases. The reading list includes key cases like Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw and Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services, alongside academic articles exploring causation principles. The seminar tasks involve answering warm-up questions on topics such as the ‘but for’ test, material contribution to damage, and indivisible injuries. Additionally, students are presented with problem questions requiring analysis of causation issues in hypothetical scenarios, such as workplace exposure to harmful chemicals and multiple injury claims. This seminar enhances understanding of complex causation and remoteness of damage in tort law.

Typology: Quizzes

2024/2025

Available from 03/13/2025

charles-khama
charles-khama 🇮🇹

3.2

(20)

7.4K documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Causation Seminar Questions. and more Quizzes Law of Torts in PDF only on Docsity!

3/12/25, 9:59 PM about:blank Causation Seminar Questions 2024-25 SEMINAR 4 NEGLIGENCE: CAUSATION IN FACT & CAUSATION IN LAW WEEK 10 Reading P Giliker, Tort (8" ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2023), chapter 6 Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 Barker v Corus (UK) plc [2006] UKHL 20 Gregg v Scott [2005] 2. AC 176 Jolley v Sutton [2000] 1 WLR 1082 Corr v IBC [2008] UKHL 13 Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467 Jobling v Associated Dairies Ltd [1982] AC 794 You may also choose to read any or all of the articles listed below: MA Jones, ‘Proving Causation: Beyond the But For Test’ (2006) Professional Negligence 251 J Stapleton, ‘Factual Causation, Mesothelioma and Statistical Validity’ (2012) Law Quarterly Review 221 M Stauch, ‘Risk and Remoteness of Damage in Negligence’ (2001) 64 Modern Law Review 191 ‘Warm up questions Why might the claimant be unable to prove ‘but for causation’? What is the difference between proving that D's negligence ‘materially contributed to the damage’ (Bonnington) and proving that D's negligence ‘materially increased the risk’? (Fairchild/Barker) ‘What do the terms ‘divisible injury’ and ‘indivisible injury’ mean? What is the difference between factual and legal causation? What is the test for ‘remoteness of damage’ for the purposes of the tort of negligence? How might novus actus interveniens overlap with defences? 113.