Chapter 1 and 2 Summary, Essays (university) of Computer Science

M. Neil Browne, Stuart M. Keeley - Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking (2007, Prentice Hall)

Typology: Essays (university)

2017/2018

Uploaded on 10/31/2018

henschel-lungu-1
henschel-lungu-1 🇿🇼

1 document

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Critical Thinking Assignment Summary of Chapter 1 and Chapter 2
Chapter 1
The Benefits of Critical Thinking
Introduction
A lot of people have different opinions. When we make decisions we usually are interested in getting
the opinions of experts. Before people watch movies they look up movie reviews to see if they will
enjoy certain movies but they notice that those reviews have many different views on which movie is
the best. Even expert opinions turn to differ.
As a person deciding which opinions are you going to receive. You can decide by taking in all
opinions from different sources then adopting some of them to suit you or choose to ask questions and
get more information which will help you to decide which opinions to adopt. The book helps to
develop skills and attitudes which will help to select the opinions you prefer.
Critical Thinking to the Rescue
You need certain skills and attitudes to be able to ask in an orderly manner related questions after
reading and listening. You will learn how to ask several critical questions which will help build on the
attitudes and skills needed to be a critical thinker.
It is important to develop a spirit of curiosity, amazement and intellectual adventure when critically
thinking. As critical thinking is a continuous process which is a non-stopping search for better
answers, decisions and claims.
The term critical thinking entails having knowledge of correlative critical questions, tactfulness to
answer and ask critical questions at proper times and the desire to use the critical questions. A person
asking critical questions must show respect as they ask those questions out of a desire to satisfy their
curiosity or a need to improve on the information they already have.
The sponge thinking style is a method whereby a person absorbs all the information from different
sources. It helps create understanding for more complicated world situations and is much easy as it
only requires a good amount of concentration and memory without exhausting mental effort. Its
drawback is that there is no process followed to make decisions on which opinions to adopt resulting
in believing the last obtained opinion.
The panning for gold style of thinking is a method whereby a person reads information but chooses
for themselves what to absorb and what to ignore. The reader or listener requires a special state of
mind which is a questioning attitude. This helps draw conclusions on what is worth believing and
what is not. It is a very challenging and exhausting task.
The two methods complement each other as the reader or listener using the panning for gold style
needs plenty of information provided by the sponge thinking style so as to select well which
knowledge will be worth keeping and adopting. The two approaches lead to different patterns of
behaviour. A person using the sponge thinking style will read and understand the author then try to
memorize the information he is being given. A person using the panning for gold style method will
read and understand the new information but goes on to evaluate the author’s judgements before
deciding which claims to believe. It also emphasizes on a conversation between the author and the
reader. Hence it is interactive participation between the speaker and the listener.
The Myth of the Right Answer
The physical world is usually predictable hence people usually accept answers given by scientists on
questions about it. Human behaviour is much less predictable therefore it is often difficult for people
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Chapter 1 and 2 Summary and more Essays (university) Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Critical Thinking Assignment Summary of Chapter 1 and Chapter 2

Chapter 1

The Benefits of Critical Thinking

Introduction

A lot of people have different opinions. When we make decisions we usually are interested in getting the opinions of experts. Before people watch movies they look up movie reviews to see if they will enjoy certain movies but they notice that those reviews have many different views on which movie is the best. Even expert opinions turn to differ.

As a person deciding which opinions are you going to receive. You can decide by taking in all opinions from different sources then adopting some of them to suit you or choose to ask questions and get more information which will help you to decide which opinions to adopt. The book helps to develop skills and attitudes which will help to select the opinions you prefer.

Critical Thinking to the Rescue

You need certain skills and attitudes to be able to ask in an orderly manner related questions after reading and listening. You will learn how to ask several critical questions which will help build on the attitudes and skills needed to be a critical thinker.

It is important to develop a spirit of curiosity, amazement and intellectual adventure when critically thinking. As critical thinking is a continuous process which is a non-stopping search for better answers, decisions and claims.

The term critical thinking entails having knowledge of correlative critical questions, tactfulness to answer and ask critical questions at proper times and the desire to use the critical questions. A person asking critical questions must show respect as they ask those questions out of a desire to satisfy their curiosity or a need to improve on the information they already have.

The sponge thinking style is a method whereby a person absorbs all the information from different sources. It helps create understanding for more complicated world situations and is much easy as it only requires a good amount of concentration and memory without exhausting mental effort. Its drawback is that there is no process followed to make decisions on which opinions to adopt resulting in believing the last obtained opinion.

The panning for gold style of thinking is a method whereby a person reads information but chooses for themselves what to absorb and what to ignore. The reader or listener requires a special state of mind which is a questioning attitude. This helps draw conclusions on what is worth believing and what is not. It is a very challenging and exhausting task.

The two methods complement each other as the reader or listener using the panning for gold style needs plenty of information provided by the sponge thinking style so as to select well which knowledge will be worth keeping and adopting. The two approaches lead to different patterns of behaviour. A person using the sponge thinking style will read and understand the author then try to memorize the information he is being given. A person using the panning for gold style method will read and understand the new information but goes on to evaluate the author’s judgements before deciding which claims to believe. It also emphasizes on a conversation between the author and the reader. Hence it is interactive participation between the speaker and the listener.

The Myth of the Right Answer

The physical world is usually predictable hence people usually accept answers given by scientists on questions about it. Human behaviour is much less predictable therefore it is often difficult for people

to arrive at the same conclusion when questions are raised about it. There is no right answer on such questions but the best answers will be probabilistic in nature. Accepting this helps us to be more open minded without bring our own preferences to the discussions. It is better to pay attention and get involved in controversies made by reasonable people as these are much more interesting.

Thinking and Feeling

Everyone has personal experiences, dreams and goals. We easily become emotionally attached to certain views because of the situations we have been through in life. When critically thinking we first need to shun those personal feelings we have about certain claims made by other people. This will help us put more mental effort on the listening and evaluating the claims. Strong emotional involvement will then follow after we have critical thought about the claims. Critical thinkers are greatly concerned about many issues and this helps them ask the right questions.

The Efficiency of asking the question “Who Cares? “

This helps in determining which issues a critical thinker should prioritise and which questions are not worth asking. As critical thinkers are more concerned about issues which help move forward their communities they do well to ask the question “Who Cares?”

Weak Sense and Strong Sense Critical Thinking

Weak Sense critical thinking involves using critical thinking skills to defend your beliefs or judgements on particular subjects. Weak sense critical thinking stops a person’s growth towards truth or virtue. Strong sense critical thinking involves evaluating all judgements and especially your own personal beliefs. It helps protect oneself from self-deceit and uniformity in judgements. This does not mean abandoning our own personal beliefs but it could really make us proud of a personal opinion and strengthen our belief in it.

Trying Out new Answers

One important quality that critical thinkers need to have is courage. It is essential as it is difficult to be willing to give up our beliefs and look for better answers. After evaluating our beliefs it is also a struggle to give up on our personal opinion but the interaction between our old answers and new ones would give a good foundation for growth.

Effective Communication and Critical Thinking

Skills learnt as one moves toward being a critical thinker help improve communication. It improves verbal communication and writing skills.

Chapter 2

What are the Issue and the Conclusion?

When critical thinking you have to start by identifying the author’s reasoning and this is not an easy task. Web pages, magazines articles or speeches are used by the creators to convince a person to change their beliefs. For a critical thinker to have a satisfactory reaction he or she must be able to identify the issue and conclusion being given by the author. Which is a very important step in interactive communication. An issue is a question or opposing opinion responsible for the conversation.

Kinds of Issues

Descriptive issues are the kind of issues which are concerned about the truthfulness of patterns or orders of the past, present and future. They usually begin with the following words do, what, who and how.