































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE. CIVIL PROCEDURE- Course about where lawsuits can be brought (personal AND subject matter jurisdiction must be satisfied).
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 39
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
































CIVIL PROCEDURE - Course about where lawsuits can be brought ( personal AND subject matter jurisdiction must be satisfied) and how litigation is conducted)
contention that the defendant did not have adequate notice of the suit or sufficient time to defend itself o Hanson (1958)- Donner went to a trust company in DE when she lived in PA and got a trust; Donner moved to FL; although Donner received trust income and carried on some trust administration in FL, the trust company did not have minimum contacts with FL ▪ Essential that there be some act by which the defendant purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its law ▪ D must have made a deliberate choice to relate to the state in some meaningful way before she can be made to bear the burden of defending there ▪ Criteria:
▪ Would say wealth doesn’t matter
Start with these questions:
1. IS THERE GENERAL OR SPECIFIC JURISDICTION? a. If General: i. IS D “DOMICILED” IN THE FORUM STATE? Hawkins 1. If yes, there is valid personal jurisdiction ii. DOES D HAVE “CONTINUOUS AND SYSTEMATIC CONTACTS WITH THE FORUM STATE? Goodyear
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION - whether the court has authority to adjudicate a particular type of case; if subject matter jurisdiction is not raised, it is not waived because a court may still not have the power to hear a case
States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties ▪ In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (2007) - district court denied defendants motion to dismiss plaintiff’s state law claims for lack of supplemental jurisdiction because the state and federal claims were connected by common and operative facts (they were intertwined) and there was no compelling reason for the court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction 1367 (c)- prevents the use of supplemental jurisdiction over claims brought by plaintiffs against parties joined under certain listed rules
▪ There is NO provision of Constitution that authorizes federal courts to apply general law in diversity cases Article III Article I- gives congress certain powers o Statutory/Statute (RDA) o Precedent (Swift v. Tyson) Results in :
decides (therefore, who decides does matter) juries are more sympathetic to individuals (especially against large corporations) judge will just interpret statue the way thinks appropriate
Civ Pro, Outline, Professor Glen Staszewski, Fall 2012 HOW TO ANALYZE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: Start with these questions:
1. IS THE CLAIM A FEDERAL QUESTION? (“ARISE UNDER” FEDERAL LAW?) a. If yes, federal court has subject matter jurisdiction 2. IS THERE COMPLETE DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP? a. If yes, federal court has subject matter jurisdiction i. Corporation: nerve center Hertz ii. People: domicile 3. IS THERE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION? (FEDERAL AND STATE CLAIM) a. If yes, federal court has subject matter jurisdiction i. Primary claim arises under federal law ii. Besides federal claim, plaintiff also claims a state claim (exp. breach of contract with is state law) and the state claim is tact on then by supplemental jurisdiction can exercise authority over the claim 4. CAN THERE BE REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT? (CASE COULD HAVE ORIGINALLY BEEN FILED IN FEDERAL COURT) a. If yes, federal court has subject matter jurisdiction i. Federal court to which the case is removed must have 1. Diversity, 2. federal question, AND/OR 3. Supplemental jurisdiction To support arguments for PL or DF for FEDERAL QUESTION: