Classical Conditioning: Special Procedures, Lecture notes of Psychology

Latent Inhibition (aka CS Pre-exposure)​​ ∎ novel stimulus more effective for conditioning ∎ Explanation for the dreaded 'Just a Friend' zone?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

char_s67
char_s67 🇱🇺

4.5

(116)

1.9K documents

1 / 18

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Classical Conditioning:
Special Procedures
nExcitatory/ Inhibitory Conditioning
nEffects of experiences that precede ClassCon
nLatent Inhibition
nHigher-order Conditioning
nSensory Pre-conditioning
nCompound stimuli
nBlocking
nOvershadowing
nTiming
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12

Partial preview of the text

Download Classical Conditioning: Special Procedures and more Lecture notes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Classical Conditioning:

Special Procedures

n Excitatory/ Inhibitory Conditioning n Effects of experiences that precede ClassCon n Latent Inhibition n Higher-order Conditioning n Sensory Pre-conditioning n Compound stimuli n Blocking n Overshadowing n Timing

Excitatory/Inhibitory Conditioning n Excitatory Conditioning: CS+ n NS -> presentation of US E.g. bell -> food

Higher-order Conditioning

(aka Second Order Conditioning ) Metronome : Food à Salivation Metronome à Salivation Light : Metronome à Salivation Light à Salivation

US UR

CS CR

CR

1

CS

1 CS 2

CR

2

Higher-order Conditioning cont.

n Pairing a new stimulus with an established CS to elicit an established CR n The new stimulus becomes a CS 2 , and elicits a CR 2 n CR 2 is usually lower in magnitude than the CR 1

Sensory Pre-conditioning n Like Higher-order Conditioning, stimulus becomes a CS even though it was never paired with US n Difference: here, two stimuli paired before US was ever presented—neither had yet become a CS

Compound Stimuli

n Overshadowing:

n The stronger component of a compound stimulus becomes a CS, but the weaker component will not. n Gunfire + light tapping: candy -> salivation n Gunfire -> salivation n Light tapping -> no salivation

n Blocking

n Presence of an established CS interferes with conditioning a new CS n Red light: candy -> salivation n Red light + green light: candy -> salivation n Green light -> no salivation

Timing of Classical Conditioning n Delayed Conditioning: most effective n CS onset, US onset, CS offset, US offset n Trace Conditioning: 2nd most effective n CS onset, CS offset, US onset, US offset n Simultaneous Conditioning: not very effective n CS & US onset at same time n Backwards Conditioning: least effective n US onset, then CS onset n Predictive value (contingency) > contiguity!

Theories of Classical Conditioning n Two Types of Theories n Type of Association Formed (S-S vs. S-R) n Nature of the CR n Pavlov’s Stimulus Substitution Theory n Siegel’s Compensatory CR Theory n Rescorla-Wagner theory

Pavlov ’ s Stimulus Substitution Theory

n US stimulates a “US center” in the brain, which excites a “response center” n CS stimulates a different part of the brain than US n After pairings, CS-US neural connection made n CR should take form of UR: light-food: dog licks light n Preparatory response theory n the form of the CR is dependent on type of S n Rat-shock: jump; light-shock -> light: freeze

Siegel ’ s Compensatory CR Theory

n US = Drug + Primary effect of drug n Coffee example: US = Caffeine + Alertness n UR = Response that opposes drug’s primary effect n Coffee example: UR = Sleepiness n UR is a compensatory response n UR occurs after the drug’s primary effect

Siegel ’ s Compensatory CR Theory cont.

Another conditioning example:

[Beer Intake + Reduced HR (primary effect)] (US)

Bar Setting (CS) à Increased HR (CR) n Note: CR occurs before primary effect n Size of CR increases with training n Opposes 1 0 effect more => drug has lesser effect n This is known as Chronic Tolerance

Siegel ’ s Compensatory CR Theory cont.

Chronic Tolerance

n Results from learning association between drug intake & environment, NOT from repeated exposure to drug n Depends on context of drug intake: situational specificity n Context becomes CS & elicits compensatory CR