Writing Successful Research Grants: Human Subjects Protection, Innovation, and Environment, Slides of Human Resource Management

A review of criteria for successful grant applications, focusing on human subjects protection, innovation, and environmental considerations. It includes common criticisms and guidelines for writing effective grants, as well as specific instructions for applying for an nih ro1 grant and the required format.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/25/2013

deveshwar
deveshwar 🇮🇳

3.9

(15)

108 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
APPROACH
If the project involves clinical research, are the
plans for 1) protection of human subjects from
research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities
and members of both sexes/genders, as well
as the inclusion of children, justified in terms
of the scientific goals and research strategy
proposed?
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Writing Successful Research Grants: Human Subjects Protection, Innovation, and Environment and more Slides Human Resource Management in PDF only on Docsity!

APPROACH

If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?

REVIEW CRITERIA

• SIGNIFICANCE

• INVESTIGATOR

• INNOVATION

• APPROACH

• ENVIRONMENT

• OVERALL IMPACT

REVIEW CRITERIA

• SIGNIFICANCE

• INVESTIGATOR

• INNOVATION

• APPROACH

• ENVIRONMENT

• OVERALL IMPACT

OVERALL IMPACT

  • Will the project exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field?
  • Overall impact score is NOT the average of all criterion scores

COMMON CRITICISMS

  • FEASIBILITY
    • Population characteristics
      • The subjects cannot be recruited
      • The experiment is not adequately powered
    • The amount of work is excessive for the resources or time available
    • Reagents and methods are not up to the task
  • FOCUS
    • The work will not result in a coherent body of knowledge
  • CONTINGENCY PLANNING
    • Alternative outcomes were not considered in the plan
    • The whole project hinges on the outcome of one part

Basic Guidelines for Successful Grant Writing

  • Identify sources of funding
  • Know what your funding source expects
  • Know the requirements/limitations of the grant (e.g., for citizenship, etc.)
  • Start ahead of time
  • Get someone else to review it before you submit it
  • Know your own limits/abilities
  • Know when/where to ask for help
  • Learn who will be reviewing your grant (influence this if you can!)
  • Know the process by which grant submission/review/notification occurs
  • Understand the scoring system and what you need to do if you choose to resubmit

NIH PROPOSAL FORMAT

  • NOTE: NUMBER OF PAGES, FONT, SPACING AND MARGINS
  • ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION ONLY, WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS
  • ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
  • PERSONNEL AND BUDGET
  • BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF INVESTIGATORS (INCLUDING PERSONAL STATEMENTS)
  • RESOURCES AND FACILITIES
  • RESEARCH PLAN
  • INCLUSION OF DIVERSE POPULATIONS
  • HUMAN AND ANIMAL USE
  • REFERENCES