Coevolution and Mutualism - Lecture Notes | IB 203, Study notes of Ecology and Environment

Material Type: Notes; Class: Ecology; Subject: Integrative Biology; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/10/2009

koofers-user-3rp-1
koofers-user-3rp-1 🇺🇸

5

(1)

8 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
LECTURE 15 COEVOLUTION AND MUTUALISM
pg. 381-383; 385-386; 389-396
MAJOR CONCEPTS
1) Coevolution involves mutual evolutionary responses by interacting populations.
2) Diffuse coevolution may be more common than strict coevolution.
3) Constraints restrict evolution of strict mutualisms.
4) Coevolution in plant-pathogen systems reveals genotype-genotype interactions
and involves a gene-for-gene concept and an ‘evolutionary arms race’.
5) Evidence for coevolution can arise from inference, circumstantial evidence, or
experimentation.
6) Mutualists have complementary functions; they involve trophic, defensive, and
dispersive functions.
Types of pairwise interspecific interactions
Mutualism (+/+)
Predation (+/-)
Competition (-/-)
Commensalism (+/0)
Amensalism (-/0)
Fluidity in type of relationship
Symbioses
Intimate, often obligatory association of two species
Usually involving coevolution
May be parasitic or mutualistic
Coevolution
Interacting species evolve in response to each other
Each species acts as selective agent on other species
Traits of each species affect fitness of other species
Traits have genetic basis
May be mutualistic or antagonistic
Strict coevolution
Limited to pair of species
Specialized response
May be rare and limited to very strong interactions
Diffuse coevolution
Response to many other species
Generalized response
Gene-for-gene concept and evolutionary ‘arms race’
Occurs in plant-pathogen and host-parasite systems
Based on single gene conferring resistance to host or virulence to pathogen
Back and forth selection between genotype of host and genotype of pathogen
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Coevolution and Mutualism - Lecture Notes | IB 203 and more Study notes Ecology and Environment in PDF only on Docsity!

LECTURE 15 COEVOLUTION AND MUTUALISM

pg. 381-383; 385-386; 389- MAJOR CONCEPTS

  1. Coevolution involves mutual evolutionary responses by interacting populations.
  2. Diffuse coevolution may be more common than strict coevolution.
  3. Constraints restrict evolution of strict mutualisms.
  4. Coevolution in plant-pathogen systems reveals genotype-genotype interactions and involves a gene-for-gene concept and an ‘evolutionary arms race’.
  5. Evidence for coevolution can arise from inference, circumstantial evidence, or experimentation.
  6. Mutualists have complementary functions; they involve trophic, defensive, and dispersive functions. Types of pairwise interspecific interactions Mutualism (+/+) Predation (+/-) Competition (-/-) Commensalism (+/0) Amensalism (-/0) Fluidity in type of relationship Symbioses Intimate, often obligatory association of two species Usually involving coevolution May be parasitic or mutualistic Coevolution Interacting species evolve in response to each other Each species acts as selective agent on other species Traits of each species affect fitness of other species Traits have genetic basis May be mutualistic or antagonistic Strict coevolution Limited to pair of species Specialized response May be rare and limited to very strong interactions Diffuse coevolution Response to many other species Generalized response Gene-for-gene concept and evolutionary ‘arms race’ Occurs in plant-pathogen and host-parasite systems Based on single gene conferring resistance to host or virulence to pathogen Back and forth selection between genotype of host and genotype of pathogen

Interaction escalates as more and more traits are added Evidence for coevolution Inference from closely related herbivores feeding on closely related plants Suggests long evolutionary history of interaction Based on parallel phylogenetic relationships Experimentation Circumstantial evidence e.g. character displacement of competing species when in sympatry but not when in allopatry; infer that competition drives coevolution Mutualism Two species specialized to perform positive function for each other Trophic: partners complement food/nutrients for each other Defensive: species receive food and/or shelter in return for defending against natural enemies Dispersive: animal vectors move pollen or seeds in return for food rewards Pollination examples Seed dispersal examples Mixed systems Yucca and its pollinator moth acting as both mutualist and seed predator When is it coevolution? Preadaptation: some adaptations present before establishment of mutualism Some adaptations occur in close relatives that are not mutualists Constraints on evolution of strict mutualism Community diversity diffuses selection from single species. Changes in species’ ranges or disturbance change selection over time/space. Genetic complexities cause uneven rates of evolution between mutualists.