MATH 111 Homework 4 Comments and Solutions, Assignments of Trigonometry

Comments and solutions for problem 10 to 19 of math 111 homework 4. The document clarifies common misconceptions and incorrect answers, and explains the correct concepts and properties related to set operations, number theory, and algebra. The document emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and properties, and the need to reason in the reverse direction when proving statements.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/27/2009

koofers-user-ube
koofers-user-ube 🇺🇸

4

(1)

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MATH 111 COMMENTS ON HW4
10. (a) False: ABconsists of the elements of Awhich are not in B.BA
is the set of elements of Bwhich are not in A. Quite different! For
example, if A={0,1,2,3}and B={2,3,4,5}, then AB={0,1}
and BA={4,5}.
There were two check marks for this problem: one for correctly saying
that the statement is false, and another for giving a correct reason or
example. Many of you gave explanations along the lines of “If A= 2
and B= 1, then 2 16= 1 2”. There are several problems with this.
First, in this exercise, Aand Bare given to be sets, not numbers. You
may have meant to compare n(AB) and n(BA), the sizes of A
and B, but then you must be cautious: n(AB) is not necessarily
equal to n(A)n(B)—only when Bis a subset of A. (And of course
no set has a size which is negative!)
(c) True: A =A, and certainly AA.
(e) False: the empty set has only one subset—the empty set! So the empty
set is equivalent to all of its subsets. (The empty set is the only set
with this property. Indeed, the empty set is a subset of every set, so if
a set is equivalent to all of its subset, it is therefore equivalent to the
empty set.)
11. A common incorrect answer was 3, which is the number of students who like
calculus and algebra but not geometry. The problem asks for all students
who like calculus and algebra (whether or not they like geometry), so the
answer is 3 + 4 = 7.
12. (a) Deceptive! While this expression looks like an expression where you’d
use the distributive property, the property that is actually used is
commutativity of addition.
(c) The best answer here is: the identity property of multiplication. The
commutative property can be used to obtain 1 ·14 = 14 ·1, but the
fact that these are both equal to 14 is the identity property. However,
I gave a check mark for giving commutativity as the answer.
16. In hindsight, this problem was ambiguous: one could interpret the state-
ment as saying that Jim received one $20 raise after the sixth month, or
as saying that there was a $20 raise in each of the final six months. Both
interpretations were accepted as correct.
17. It’s not enough to say “nothing can be divided by zero”: why can’t anything
be divided by zero? We want to way that a/b =qif qis the unique number
such that a=b·q. If we try to divide, say, 1 by 0, the problem is that there
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download MATH 111 Homework 4 Comments and Solutions and more Assignments Trigonometry in PDF only on Docsity!

MATH 111 COMMENTS ON HW

  1. (a) False: A − B consists of the elements of A which are not in B. B − A is the set of elements of B which are not in A. Quite different! For example, if A = { 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } and B = { 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 }, then A − B = { 0 , 1 } and B − A = { 4 , 5 }.

There were two check marks for this problem: one for correctly saying that the statement is false, and another for giving a correct reason or example. Many of you gave explanations along the lines of “If A = 2 and B = 1, then 2 − 1 6 = 1 − 2”. There are several problems with this. First, in this exercise, A and B are given to be sets, not numbers. You may have meant to compare n(A − B) and n(B − A), the sizes of A and B, but then you must be cautious: n(A − B) is not necessarily equal to n(A) − n(B)—only when B is a subset of A. (And of course no set has a size which is negative!)

(c) True: A ∪ ∅ = A, and certainly A ⊆ A.

(e) False: the empty set has only one subset—the empty set! So the empty set is equivalent to all of its subsets. (The empty set is the only set with this property. Indeed, the empty set is a subset of every set, so if a set is equivalent to all of its subset, it is therefore equivalent to the empty set.)

  1. A common incorrect answer was 3, which is the number of students who like calculus and algebra but not geometry. The problem asks for all students who like calculus and algebra (whether or not they like geometry), so the answer is 3 + 4 = 7.
  2. (a) Deceptive! While this expression looks like an expression where you’d use the distributive property, the property that is actually used is commutativity of addition.

(c) The best answer here is: the identity property of multiplication. The commutative property can be used to obtain 1 · 14 = 14 · 1, but the fact that these are both equal to 14 is the identity property. However, I gave a check mark for giving commutativity as the answer.

  1. In hindsight, this problem was ambiguous: one could interpret the state- ment as saying that Jim received one $20 raise after the sixth month, or as saying that there was a $20 raise in each of the final six months. Both interpretations were accepted as correct.
  2. It’s not enough to say “nothing can be divided by zero”: why can’t anything be divided by zero? We want to way that a/b = q if q is the unique number such that a = b · q. If we try to divide, say, 1 by 0, the problem is that there

aren’t any q such that 1 = q · 0. But here, the difficulty is that there are far too many: 0 = q · 0 for any choice of q. So 0/0 does not exist because there is not just one number by which 0 can be multiplied to give 0.

(To argue slightly differently, Sue could equally well have said: any num- ber divided by ten times itself is 1/10. So 0/0 should be 1/10. Well, why not?)

  1. The point here is that (a/b) · b = a by definition. a/b is defined to be the unique number which gives a when multiplied by b. So (a/b) · b = a comes straight from the definition of a/b. (This is why the cancellation law is correct.)

I want to draw attention to a particular argument that many of you used, and why it is troublesome. Many people wrote down (a/b) · b = a (that is, they wrote down what they were trying to prove), then used the cancellation law to write a = a. Since a = a is evidently true, you concluded that your premise (that (a/b) · b = a) was true. Please, please take caution: beginning with a hypothesis and deriving, from this hypothesis, a true statement, does not prove the hypothesis! For example, I could try to prove the statement “0 = 1 and 2 = 2” by writing down “0 = 1 and 2 = 2”, concluding from this that 2 = 2, and deciding that my premise must have been correct. In fact, if you recall how if-then statements worked, the statement “if A then B” is always true if A is false. So I can derive anything that I want, beginning from a false statement!

Essentially, you need to reason in the reverse direction: you must begin with the true statement (e.g. a = a) and use the true statement to derive the consequence that you want. Not the other way around!