Community Development - Community Development - Lecture Slides, Slides of Human Development

In the course of community development the main concept that we study are:Community Development, Opportunities Disparity, Populations and Communities, Inconsistent and Shrinking Funds, Resources, Shrinking Political, Victim-Blaming, Unsuccessful Social Policies, Communities, Disempowered

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/22/2013

sashekala
sashekala 🇮🇳

4.5

(21)

120 documents

1 / 16

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Asset Based Community Development
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Community Development - Community Development - Lecture Slides and more Slides Human Development in PDF only on Docsity!

Asset Based Community Development

Why A B C D?

  • Opportunities disparity (for marginalized populations and communities) - Inconsistent and shrinking funds/resources - Shrinking political will - Victim-blaming - Unsuccessful social policies - Communities and their residents are disempowered

My first lesson in Mapping Assets

Traditional development vs A B C D

  • Needs, deficiencies, problems
  • Negative mental map
  • Client mentality
  • Resources go to social service agencies
  • Undermines local leadership
  • Dependency
  • Separates community
  • Outside in
    • Capacities, assets, dreams, strengths
    • Optimistic mental map
    • Citizen participation
    • Minimizes bureaucracy, resources to community
    • Builds local leadership and confidence
    • Empowerment
    • Builds connections
    • Inside out

What’s good about A B C D?

  • Begins with what the community/individuals have
  • Can begin/be sustained without funding, grants
  • Builds leadership
  • Builds internal connections – no “them” vs “us”
  • Builds connections between community and the outside
  • Issues and solutions defined holistically – as they are experienced
  • Self-sufficiency/empowerment can be built

Outside in – solutions come from outside,

self-definition – broken, dependent on

agencies

Inside out - solutions from inside,

community fabric is built, self-definition -

resourceful

Hear the difference

  • “Our purpose is not to help people. Our purpose is to build a different kind of neighborhood for us all.”
  • “Everything we do is intentional. It all serves to build reciprocal, supportive relationships.”
  • “We are committed to building a stronger, more diverse community, a community that extends hospitality and welcomes the contribution of everyone. A strong community is where everyone contributes: young, old,disabled or otherwise. Participation creates a happier, healthier, more productive community.”
  • “Building relationships is what it’s all about. The networking, the one-on-one relationships – that’s what builds inclusive neighborhoods for everybody.” From Rans, SA, Green, M Hidden Treasures: Building Community Connections by Engaging the gifts.. 2005 ABCD Institute

Principles of A B C D

  • Asset-based
  • Full participation/full contribution
    • Everyone is important
    • Mobilize all gifts, all creativity
  • Relationship-driven
    • Builds capacity, creative solutions
  • Internally focused - local solutions
    • More successful
    • More efficient use of resources
  • Creates citizen space

A B C D Processes

  • Map of community’s assets
  • Individuals mobilize, contribute gifts, talents
  • Internal connections
    • Develop a vision, “common good”
    • Define and solve problems
    • Multiple pathways for leadership
  • External connections
    • Reinforce internal strengths
    • Appropriate to community’s vision

A B C D and Service Learning

  • Core principles of social justice and equity
  • Respect for the community and its individuals
  • Paradigm shift – missionary mentality
  • Paradigm shift – community-driven vs research- driven, funder-driven
  • Conceptual framework/tools to understand communities

Institutionalization of service-learning will

depend on the “transformation of a set of

elitist, self-referential academic assumptions”

Zlotkowski, E. 1995