Math 213a PS 5: Complex Analysis - Series, Convergence, Infinite Products, Exercises of Mathematics

Problem set 5 for math 213a: complex analysis. The problems cover topics such as expressing complex series in closed form, uniform convergence on compacta, infinite products, and doubly periodic functions. Students are expected to use concepts of analytic functions, residues, and infinite series.

Typology: Exercises

2011/2012

Uploaded on 03/08/2012

tylar
tylar 🇺🇸

4.8

(19)

238 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 213a: Complex analysis
Problem Set #5 (22 October 2003):
Series of analytic functions; partial fractions and product formula
1. i) [Ahlfors IV.3.1, Ex.2 (p.153)] Express P
n=−∞ 1/(z3n3) in closed form.
ii) [Seen in B. Amend’s Foxtrot cartoon, 6.ii.1996] Evaluate in closed form:
P
k=1(1)k+1k2/(k3+ 1).
2. We showed that if fnare analytic functions with fnfuniformly on com-
pact subsets of then fis analytic and f0= limn→∞ f0
nuniformly on
compacta. We noted that as it stands this result requires that Cand
that fn, f take values in C.
i) Give a definition for “uniform convergence on compacta” for sequences of
maps between any two Riemann surfaces S, S0, and show that your defi-
nition is reasonable in that it agrees with the usual definition for subsets
of Cand does not depend on any choices made in the definition (such as
local coordiante patches).
ii) Do the same for f0= limn→∞ f0
nuniformly on compacta”.
iii) Now extend “our” theorem to sequences of analytic maps from Sto S0.
[This should be the easy part.]
3. [Suggested by the remark in Ahlfors p.155] For anCsuch that |an|<1
for each n, let Pand Sbe respectively the infinite product Q
n=1(1 + an)
and the infinite series P
n=1 an.
i) Assume P
n=1 |an|2<. Prove then Pconverges if and only if Scon-
verges.
ii) Without the hypothesis on P
n=1 |an|2, show that there exist anfor which
Pconverges but Sdoes not, and anfor which Pdoes not converge but S
does. Can all anbe real?
4. [Prelude to doubly periodic functions] Let A0be the ring of meromorphic
functions fon Csuch that f(z+ 1) = f(z) for all zCand there exists
a limit L=L(f)Csuch that f(z)Las |Im(z)| .
i) Prove that there exists M < and poles bν(ν= 1,2, . . . , M ) of fsuch
that every pole of fis bν+kfor some unique ν {1,2, . . . , M }and
kZ. (Of course if fis analytic then we take M= 0 and interpret
{1,2, . . . , M } as the empty set.)
ii) Prove that PM
ν=1 Resz=bνf(z)dz = 0.
iii) Prove that
f(z) = L(f) + X
kZ"M
X
ν=1
Pν1
z(bν+k)#,
where Pν(1/(zbν)) is the principal part of fat bν, and the series con-
verges uniformly in compact subsets of C(with the usual interpretation
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Math 213a PS 5: Complex Analysis - Series, Convergence, Infinite Products and more Exercises Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 213a: Complex analysis Problem Set #5 (22 October 2003): Series of analytic functions; partial fractions and product formula

  1. i) [Ahlfors IV.3.1, Ex.2 (p.153)] Express

n=−∞ 1 /(z

(^3) − n (^3) ) in closed form. ii) [Seen in B. Amend’s∑ Foxtrot cartoon, 6.ii.1996] Evaluate in closed form: ∞ k=1(−1)

k+1k (^2) /(k (^3) + 1).

  1. We showed that if fn are analytic functions with fn → f uniformly on com- pact subsets of Ω then f is analytic and f ′^ = limn→∞ f (^) n′ uniformly on compacta. We noted that as it stands this result requires that Ω ⊆ C and that fn, f take values in C. i) Give a definition for “uniform convergence on compacta” for sequences of maps between any two Riemann surfaces S, S′, and show that your defi- nition is reasonable in that it agrees with the usual definition for subsets of C and does not depend on any choices made in the definition (such as local coordiante patches). ii) Do the same for “f ′^ = limn→∞ f (^) n′ uniformly on compacta”. iii) Now extend “our” theorem to sequences of analytic maps from S to S′. [This should be the easy part.]
  2. [Suggested by the remark in Ahlfors p.155] For an ∈ C such that |an| < 1 for each n, let P and S be respectively the infinite product

n=1(1 +^ an) and the infinite series

n=1 an. i) Assume

n=1 |an| (^2) < ∞. Prove then P converges if and only if S con- verges. ii) Without the hypothesis on

n=1 |an| (^2) , show that there exist an for which P converges but S does not, and an for which P does not converge but S does. Can all an be real?

  1. [Prelude to doubly periodic functions] Let A 0 be the ring of meromorphic functions f on C such that f (z + 1) = f (z) for all z ∈ C and there exists a limit L = L(f ) ∈ C such that f (z) → L as | Im(z)| → ∞. i) Prove that there exists M < ∞ and poles bν (ν = 1, 2 ,... , M ) of f such that every pole of f is bν + k for some unique ν ∈ { 1 , 2 ,... , M } and k ∈ Z. (Of course if f is analytic then we take M = 0 and interpret “{ 1 , 2 ,... , M }” as the empty set.) ii) Prove that

∑M

ν=1 Resz=bν f^ (z)^ dz^ = 0. iii) Prove that

f (z) = L(f ) +

k∈Z

[ M

ν=

z − (bν + k)

)]

where Pν (1/(z − bν )) is the principal part of f at bν , and the series con- verges uniformly in compact subsets of C (with the usual interpretation

at z = bν ). iv) Conclude that A 0 is the ring of rational functions of e^2 πiz^ , say g(e^2 πiz^ ), that are regular at 0 and ∞ with g(0) = g(∞). v) Let A ⊃ A 0 be the ring of meromorphic functions f on C such that f (z + 1) = f (z) for all z ∈ C and there exist limits L± = L±(f ) ∈ C such that f (z) → L+ as Im(z) → +∞ and f (z) → L− as Im(z) → −∞. Adapt the argument for (i–iv) to identify A with a suitable ring of rational functions of e^2 πiz^.

A Jensen-style inequality for analytic functions on a half-plane, and an applica- tion:

  1. i) Let f (z) be a bounded analytic function on the right half-plane Re(z) > 0, with real zeros at xk of multiplicity mk. Show that either f vanishes iden- tically or

xk > 1 mk/xk^ converges. ii) Let α(t) be a continuous complex-valued function on the interval [0, 1]. Show that if

0 t

pk (^) α(t)dt = 0 for distinct pk > 0 with ∑ k p

− 1 k =^ ∞^ then α = 0 identically.

In the special case pk = 1, 2 , 3 ,.. ., this is an easy consequence of Weierstrass’ Approxi- mation Theorem, stating that any continuous function on a closed interval is a uniform limit of polynomials. [Consider 0 ≤

0 (t^ −^ t

(^2) )|α(t)| (^2) dt = ∫^1 0

(t − t^2 )¯α(t)

α(t) dt, and approximate the ¯α(t) uniformly by a polynomial.] That Weierstrass result is general- ized by a memorable theorem of M¨untz: fix 0 = p 0 < p 1 < p 2 < p 3 <.. .; then every continuous function on [0, 1] is a uniform limit of linear combinations of the powers tpk^ if and only if

k=1 p

− 1 k diverges.^ Indeed, one approach to this theorem uses part (ii) above and related ideas from complex analysis.

This problem set is due Wednesday, October 29, at the beginning of class.