Complex Analysis 6, Exercises - Mathematics, Exercises of Complex Numbers Theory

holomorphic function, conjecture,arithmetic,geometric means, Riemann Mapping from the Bergman Kernel, complex numbers , orthonormal sequence of holomorphic functions, Hilbert space , unitary matrix, Transformation of Bergman Kernel Under Biholomorphic Map,Riemann Mapping in Terms of Bergman Kernel, quadratic polynomial.

Typology: Exercises

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/11/2011

jamal33
jamal33 🇺🇸

4.3

(51)

340 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 113 (Spring 2009) Yum-Tong Siu 1
Homework Assigned on April 21, 2009
due April 28, 2009
Problem 1 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.259, #8). Let fbe an injective holo-
morphic function in the unit disk, with f(0) = 0 and f0(0) = 1. If we write
f(z) = z+a2z2+a3z3+· · · +anzn+· · · ,
then Bieberbach conjectured that |an| nfor all n2, which was proved
by deBranges. This problem outlines an argument to prove the conjecture
under the additional assumption that the coefficients anare real.
(a) Let z=re with 0 < r < 1, and show that if v(r, θ) denotes the imaginary
part of f¡re ¢, then
anrn=2
πZπ
0
v(r, θ) sin dθ.
(b) Show that for 0 θπand n= 1,2,· · · ,we have |sin | nsin θ.
(c) Use the fact that anRto show that f(D) is symmetric with respect to
the real axis, and use this fact to show that fmaps the upper half-disk into
either the upper or lower part of f(D).
(d) Show that for rsmall,
v(r, θ) = rsin θ[1 + O(r)] ,
and use the previous part to conclude that v(r, θ) sin θ0 for all 0 < r < 1
and 0 θπ.
(e) Prove that |anrn| nr, and let r1 to conclude that |an| n.
(f) Check that the function
f(z) = 1
(1 z)2
satisfies all the hypotheses and that |an|=nfor all n.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Complex Analysis 6, Exercises - Mathematics and more Exercises Complex Numbers Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

Homework Assigned on April 21, 2009

due April 28, 2009

Problem 1 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.259, #8). Let f be an injective holo-

morphic function in the unit disk, with f (0) = 0 and f

′ (0) = 1. If we write

f (z) = z + a 2 z

2

  • a 3 z

3

  • · · · + anz

n

  • · · · ,

then Bieberbach conjectured that |an| ≤ n for all n ≥ 2, which was proved

by deBranges. This problem outlines an argument to prove the conjecture

under the additional assumption that the coefficients an are real.

(a) Let z = re

iθ with 0 < r < 1, and show that if v(r, θ) denotes the imaginary

part of f

re

, then

anr

n

π

∫ (^) π

0

v(r, θ) sin nθ dθ.

(b) Show that for 0 ≤ θ ≤ π and n = 1, 2 , · · · , we have | sin nθ| ≤ n sin θ.

(c) Use the fact that an ∈ R to show that f (D) is symmetric with respect to

the real axis, and use this fact to show that f maps the upper half-disk into

either the upper or lower part of f (D).

(d) Show that for r small,

v(r, θ) = r sin θ [1 + O (r)] ,

and use the previous part to conclude that v(r, θ) sin θ ≥ 0 for all 0 < r < 1

and 0 ≤ θ ≤ π.

(e) Prove that |anr

n | ≤ nr, and let r → 1 to conclude that |an| ≤ n.

(f) Check that the function

f (z) =

(1 − z)

2

satisfies all the hypotheses and that |an| = n for all n.

Problem 2 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.259, #9). Gauss found a connection

between elliptic integrals and the familiar operations of forming arithmetic

and geometric means. We start with any pair (a, b) of numbers such that

a ≥ b > 0, and form the arithmetic and geometric means of a and b, that is,

a 1 =

a + b

and b 1 = (ab)

1 (^2).

We then repeat these operations with a and b replaced by a 1 and b 1. Iterating

this process provides two sequences {an} and {bn} where an+1 and bn+1 are

the arithmetic and geometric means of an and bn respectively.

(a) Prove that the two sequences {an} and {bn} have a common limit. This

limit, which we denote by M (a, b), is called the arithmetic-geometric mean

of a and b.

Hint: Show that

a ≥ a 1 ≥ a 2 ≥ · · · ≥ an ≥ bn ≥ · · · ≥ b 2 ≥ b 1 ≥ b

and

an − bn ≤

a − b

n

(b) Gauss’s identity states that

M (a, b)

π

∫ π 2

0

( a^2 cos^2 θ + b^2 sin

2 θ

2

To prove this relation, show that if I(a, b) denotes the integral on the right-

hand side, then it suffices to establish the invariance of I, namely,

(∗) I(a, b) = I

a + b

, (ab)

1 2

Then, observe that the connection with the elliptic integrals takes the form

I(a, b) =

a

K(k) =

a

0

dx √ (1 − x

2 )(1 − k

2 x

2 )

where k

2 = 1 −

b^2 a^2

, and that the relation (∗) is a consequence of the identity

K(k) =

1 + ˜k

K

1 − ˜k

1 + ˜k

for ˜k

2 = 1 − k

2 and 0 < ˜k < 1.

converges uniformly on compact subsets of Ω and also show that

∑^ ∞

n=

fn(z)fn(ζ)

converges on compact subsets of Ω × Ω with (z, ζ) ∈ Ω × Ω by using

q ∑

j=p

fn(z)fn(ζ)

2

q ∑

j=p

|fn(z)|

2

q ∑

j=p

|fn(ζ)|

2

The Bergman kernel of Ω is defined as

KΩ(z, ζ¯) =

∞ ∑

n=

fn(z)fn(ζ)

when {fn}n∈N is an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of all square-

integrable holomorphic functions on Ω. Verify that the Bergman kernel is

independent of the orthonormal basis {fn}n∈N chosen.

Hint: Use approximation by the following analog with a finite number of

terms. Let ξj , ξ

′ j , ηj^ , η

′ j (for 1^ ≤^ j^ ≤^ k) be complex numbers related by

ξj =

∑^ m

k=

cjkηk,

ξ

′ j =

∑^ m

k=

cjkη

′ k

for 1 ≤ j ≤ m, where the matrix (cjk)

m j,k=

is a unitary matrix. Then

∑^ m

j=

ξj ξ

′ j =

∑^ m

j=

∑m

k=

cjkηk

∑m

`=

cj`η

′ `

m ∑

k,`=

m ∑

j=

cjkcj`

ηj η

′ ` =

m ∑

j=

ηj η

′ j.

(b) (Transformation of Bergman Kernel Under Biholomorphic Map) Let Ω

and D be two domains in C, each either bounded or simply connected not

equal to C. Let Φ : Ω → D be a bibolomorphic map between Ω and D.

Verify that

KΩ(z, ζ¯) = KD

Φ(z), Φ(ζ)

′ (z)Φ′(ζ)

for z, ζ ∈ Ω, where Φ

′ means the first-order derivative of the holomorphic

function Φ on Ω. [Hint: if {fn(w)}n∈N is an orthonormal family of holomor-

phic functions on D and is a basis of the Hilbert space of all square-integrable

holomorphic functions on D, then {fn (Φ(z)) Φ

′ (z)}n∈N is orthonormal fam-

ily of holomorphic functions on Ω and is a basis of the Hilbert space of all

square-integrable holomorphic functions on Ω.]

(c) (Bergman Kernel of the Unit Disk) Verify that the Bergman kernel KD(z, ζ¯)

of the open unit disk D is given by

(†) KD(z, ζ¯) =

π

1 − z ζ¯

[Hint: the functions

n + 1

π

z

n for n ∈ N ∪ { 0 }

form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of all square-integrable holo-

morphic functions on the open unit disk D.]

(d) (Riemann Mapping in Terms of Bergman Kernel) Let Ω be a simply

connected domain in C not equal to C. Let z 0 ∈ Ω and Φ : Ω → D be the

biholomorphic map such that Φ (z 0 ) = 0 and Φ

′ (z 0 ) = α > 0. Let

Ψ(z) =

∂ ∂ ζ¯

KΩ(z, ζ¯)

KΩ(z, ζ¯)

ζ=z 0

By taking

∂ ∂ ζ¯

of the logarithm of

() KΩ(z, ζ¯) = KD

Φ(z), Φ(ζ)

′ (z)Φ′(ζ)

at the point ζ = z 0 , show that

Φ(z) = α

Ψ (z) − Ψ (z 0 )

Ψ′^ (z 0 )

and letting n → ∞, derive the formula

π cot πz =

z

n∈Z−{ 0 }

z − n

n

(b) By differentiating the expression in Part(a), derive the formula

∑^ ∞

m=−∞

(m + τ )

2

π

2

sin

2 (πτ )

(c) Setting τ =

1 2

in Part(b), deduce that

m≥ 1 , m odd

m

2

π

2

and

m≥ 1

m

2

π

2

(d) Similarly, using

∞ ∑

m=−∞

(m + τ )^4

deduce that ∑

m≥ 1 , m odd

m

4

π

4

and

m≥ 1

m

4

π

2

Problem 7 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.281, #2). Let τ ∈ C with Im τ > 0

and Λ = Z + Zτ and Λ

∗ = Λ − { 0 }. Define

P(z) =

z

2

ω∈Λ∗

[

(z + ω)

2

ω

2

]

Show that

P(z) = c + π

2

∞ ∑

m=−∞

sin

2 ((z + mτ )π)

where c is an appropriate constant.

Problem 8 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.281, #3). Let τ ∈ C with Im τ > 0

and Λ = Z + Zτ and Λ

∗ = Λ − { 0 }. Define

P(z) =

z

2

ω∈Λ∗

[

(z + ω)

2

ω

2

]

Define

g 2 = 60

ω∈Λ∗

ω

4

and g 3 = 140

ω∈Λ∗

ω

6

so that (P

′ )

2 = 4P

3 − g 2 P − g 3. Suppose Ω is a simply connected domain

that excludes the three roots of the polynomial 4z

3 − g 2 z − g 3. For w 0 ∈ Ω

and w 0 fixed, define the function I(w) on Ω by

I(w) =

∫ (^) w

w 0

dz √ 4 z^3 − g 2 z − g 3

for w ∈ Ω.

Show that the function z = I(w) has an inverse given by w = P(z + α)

for some constant α; that is, I (P(z + α)) = z for an appropriate α. [Hint:

Prove that (I (P(z + α)))

′ = ±1 and use the fact that P is even.]