






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A computer project problem for maximizing the daily net profit of a manufacturing company using linear programming (lp). The problem involves using two raw materials and producing three products, with given availability, minimum and maximum daily demands, and net profit per ton. The challenge is to formulate the problem as an lp and discuss the impact of increasing a local content constraint on the total component cost per unit product.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 10
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!







Resource Input units/ton of product Daily P 1 P 2 P 3 availability M 1 1 2 1 430 M 2 3 0 2 460 R 1 (tons) 1 4 0 420 R 2 (tons) 1 1 1 300 Min daily demand 70 Max daily demand 240 Net profit ($/ton) 300 200 500
Formulate problem of maximizing total daily net profit of company, subject to all the constraints as an LP. Solve the LP using AMPL (will get you a higher grade if you use this software), or any other software. Write a report explaining the output, and all the useful planning information that can be derived from it.
mi = no. copies of component i used to produce 1 unit of final product cih = delivered unit purchase cost ($) of component i from cheapest supplier in host country cig = delivered unit purchase cost ($) of component i from cheapest global supplier.
Data provided in following table.
Component i mi cig cih 1 20 0.25 0. 2 2 2.20 4. 3 4 5.30 6. 4 1 80.00 95. 5 1 45.50 52. 6 2 7.25 7. 7 12 2.40 3. 8 4 3.00 4. 9 4 12.00 19. 10 1 50.00 100.
The local supplier is the cheapest supplier globally for component 6, but all other components have a foreign source as the cheapest supplier. Assume that no supplier has capacity constraints. The host country has a domestic content policy which stipulates that a specified fraction α or higher of the total value of all the components in the manufactured product must come from domestic suppliers. For i = 1 to 10, define the decision variables:
xi = fraction of component i sourced from cheapest local supplier 1 − xi = yi = fraction of component i sourced from cheapest global supplier.
Assume that the annual production target is T = 10^6 units of the product. Using the above decision variables, formulate the problem of minimizing the total component cost, subject to the domestic content policy, as an LP. Solve the model for several values of α, say, 0, 0.25, 0.50, and 1. Discuss how the total component cost per unit product varies as α increases.
knows a lot about schools, finance, and accounting, but not a lot about engineering. She is familiar with the types of problems industrial engineers can solve, but she is not at all familiar with industrial engineering problem-solving methods. Ms. Firestone needs to be able to explain her choices of citizens to appoint to this ad hoc committee. As chair, she is authorized by the bylaws of the school committee to appoint citizens to an ad hoc committee. She does not need the approval of the other members of the school committee. Since this is a very important report and it fits her management style, she plans to seek a consensus on appointments to the ad hoc committee from school-committee members before actually making the appointments. About you: You are a Staff Engineer with a very prestigious engineering consulting firm, IOE 310, Inc. You would like to be a Senior Engineer. IOE 310, Inc. has a reputation for rapidly promoting engineers who bring business into the company. You are new to the consulting business and want to build a reputation as an outstanding engineering consultant. About the scenario: You learned that the school committee was forming the ad hoc committee from your cousin who is a secretary with the school district. As a concerned citizen you decided to volunteer your time to help the school committee. You set up an appointment and met with Ms. Firestone, School Committee Chair. She explained her problem to you and was very pleased to have your assistance. During your meeting you had an opportunity to talk a little about business, and you learned that AutoParts, Inc. is having some minor problems with inventory control and in other areas in which you and your colleagues at IOE 310, Inc. have considerable expertise. The management team at AutoParts, Inc. is meeting next month for a quarterly budget review. Ms. Firestone told you that she is going to recommend funding for expert consulting services. You seemed to have stumbled upon a business opportunity here. What you have accomplished so far: Ms. Firestone gave you a list of 42 different types of expertise (numbered 0 to 41) that she feels need to be represented on the ad hoc committee. You surveyed 33 people (numbered 0 to 32) who are willing to serve on the ad hoc committee and identified their areas of expertise. The data is given in the table: E is the number of expertise type, and cit. with E. are the people with that expertise. Your technical assignment: Ms. Firestone feels that it is very important to keep the size of the committee small. Determine the smallest committee that contains all types of expertise. Your communication assignment: You definitely have a moderately difficult report writing situation: you need to write a recommendation and you can not make any simplifying assumptions. Your task goal is to have your recommendation on the citizens to appoint to the ad hoc committee approved by Ms. Firestone and the other members of the school committee. Your social goal is to increase your credibility with Ms. Firestone. Her perception of your abilities as an engineer are sure to be greatly influenced by the quality of your report.
E. Cit. with E. E. Cit. with E. E. Cit. with E. 0 2, 4, 7, 18, 22 1 8, 0, 6, 19, 32 2 7, 3, 6, 13, 25 3 4, 5, 14, 29 4 10, 18, 27 5 11, 12, 20, 23 6 7, 12, 14, 22 7 1, 16, 18, 28 8 13, 16, 17, 28 9 4, 12, 17, 18, 22 10 6, 14, 18, 19, 32 11 3, 13, 17, 25, 26 12 4, 5, 14, 29 13 16, 18, 27 14 11, 20, 23, 31 15 7, 12, 14, 22 16 16, 18, 28, 32 17 13, 17, 32 18 19, 26, 28, 30 19 15, 16, 18, 32 20 17, 22, 26, 28 21 2, 8, 12, 14, 17 22 2, 6, 9, 11, 28 23 3, 5, 23, 26, 27 24 4, 9, 14, 15 25 0, 8, 17 26 1, 10, 13, 19 27 2, 7, 12, 24 28 0, 8, 16, 18 29 6, 7, 13, 28 30 2, 8, 12, 17, 24 31 9, 26, 28, 31, 32 32 6, 7, 15, 23, 31 33 5, 14, 19, 24 34 7, 21, 28 35 3, 11, 30, 31 36 4, 18, 27, 32 37 8, 17, 25, 32 38 7, 23, 32 39 3, 28, 29, 30 40 5, 13, 18, 30 41 7, 26, 31, 32
cij = Communication costs (in $/hour) to the company, if customers from area code j are allocated to be served by a center set up at site i. di = Cost (in $million/year) of operating a communi- cation center at site i
Data on these cost coefficients is given below. Formulate a model to determine the best sites to set up the centers, and the allocation of area codes to the centers set up, so as to minimize the total annual operational and communication costs for serving all the area codes given above, subject to the constraints. Solve the model. Explain the computer output and the optimum solution obtained.
Katta G. Murty, IOE Dept. U. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Making one unit of a new product needs: 3 units resource 1 (MV of $10 net profit/unit ) 5 units resource 2 (MV $15/unit) 7 units resource 3 (MV $20/unit) Then this product worth making if its net profit potential ≥ 3 × 10 + 5 × 15 + 7 × 20 = $215/unit.
Optimization of crude oil refining & blending. 3 suppliers of crude with following data: Availability Price B/day $/B Crude 1 60,000 15. 2 90,000 13. 3 80,000 14.
Distillation outputs at fractionater (IP = Interm. Product)
Yield of IP (B/B) DN DHO DGO P Crude 1 0.19 0.27 0.38 0. 2 0.16 0.32 0.27 0. 3 0.02 0.24 0.26 0. Processing cost $0.6/B of crude Distillation capacity = 110,000 B/day
2nd stage processing of some IPs in a CC (Catalytic cracker). Only DHO, DGO processed here. N = normal level, H = high level. Capacity: either 100,000 B of DHO/day, or 50,000 B of DGO/day or any convex combination. Yield at CC (B/B) CN CHO P DGO at N 0.48 0.52 0. DHO at N 0.18 0.8 0. DHO at H 0.32 0.69 0. Processing cost $0.95/B at N, $1.5/B at H
Blending IPs into final products
DHO → Heating oil. Sells for $39.75/B. Daily demand ≤ 40 , 000B DGO → Diesel fuel. $39/B. No limit on demand P + CHO (17 : 2 mix) → Heavy fuel oil. $30/B. No limit DN + CN (20 : α where α ≥ 17 mix)
→ Gasoline. Quality ↑ as α ↑. $43.25/B. Demand ≤ 40 , 000 B
Need determine complete daily production plan to max daily net profit. We encourage use of AMPL in our classes. After obtaining opt. primal & dual sols. students analyze to answer following type questions.
Which crude supply to increase, & how much can we pay per B & still break even. What is the benefit from expanding capacity at fractionater & the CC? What is the benefit of increasing demand for gasoline & heating oil? etc.
Many nice computer project problems with data can be found in following books:
Armories classified into 3 classes. Units in class 1 need to train 4 weekends/year. Those in class 2 need to train twice/year. Those on class 3 need to train once/year. For each unit, time gap between repeat training sessions should be ≥ 8 weeks.
Other input data: The (368 + 29) × (368 + 29) Euclidean distance matrix giving the distance between every pair of locations among armories & HQ sites.
Decisions to be made:
Home base selection: Select home bases for each of the 21 mobile trainers from among the 29 HQ sites. A Location problem.
STS Selection: Select as many STS as necessary from armories & remaining HQ sites, so that each armory is within 100 miles of at least one home base or STS. A Selection Problem¿
Allocate units to home base or STS: Allocate each armory to a home base or STS within 100 miles of it, for training. An Allocation Problem.
Routing mobile trainers: Develop routes for mobile trainers to cover all STS. A Partitioning & Routing Problem.
Schedule training sessions: Develop a time schedule over the weekends of the year, for each unit to receive as many training sessions as they are supposed to. A Scheduling Problem.
OBJ1: Min total annual mobile trainer fleet mileage. vspace0.2in OBJ2: Min platoon-bus mileage
OBJ3: Min no. of STS.
Large scale multiobjective problem involving many of the different types of combi- natorial optimization problems, within itself. You can read the report on this problem and its solution in our paper: Katta G. Murty, Philipp A. Djang, “The US Army National Guard’s Mobile Training Simulators Location and Routing Problem” Operations Research, 47, no. 2 (March-April 1999)175-182.