Semantics of Names, Referential Meaning, and Kinds in Linguistics, Slides of Formal Semantics

The semantics of names and their relationship with definite descriptions, the direct referential nature of names, and the distinction between referential and attributive meanings. It also delves into the concept of kinds and bare plurals, and discusses the challenges of computing quantity and coercion in linguistics.

Typology: Slides

2013/2014

Uploaded on 01/30/2014

sathasivam
sathasivam 🇮🇳

4.5

(28)

148 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Last Time
(Section 5.3)
Contrast Novelty (indefinite) and Familarity (definite)
Example:
(6a) A dog (new information) came into the house
(6b) The dog (old information) wanted some water
(Section 5.4.1)
Names = concealed descriptions
Example:
–(A) (Name) Confucius
–(B) (Definite Description)the most famous Chinese philosopher
both seem to “pick out” or refer to a single individual but there is one
important difference:
(B) gives you the criterion for computing or picking out the individual
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Semantics of Names, Referential Meaning, and Kinds in Linguistics and more Slides Formal Semantics in PDF only on Docsity!

Last Time

-^

(Section 5.3)

-^

Contrast

Novelty

indefinite

) and

Familarity

definite

-^

Example

-^

(6a) A dog (

new information

) came into the house

-^

(6b) The dog (

old information

) wanted some water

-^

(Section 5.4.1)^ Names = concealed descriptions

-^

Example

–^

(A) (

Name

) Confucius

–^

(B) (

Definite Description

) the most famous Chinese philosopher

–^

both seem to “pick out” or refer to a single individual but there is oneimportant difference:

-^

(B) gives you the criterion for computing or picking out the individual

Last Time

-^

(Section 5.4.2–3)

-^

Names are directly referential

-^

Variations:–

Kripke

: names are non-descriptive, names refer to things from historical reasons

(causal chain)

-^

Evans

:^ social context is important

(names can change wrt. referent)

-^

Examples

-^

Madagascar

-^

originally named part of mainland Africa

-^

as a result of Marco Polo’s mistake: the island off the coast of Africa

-^

kangaroo

-^

“I don’t understand” (aboriginal)

-^

ganjurru

(Guugu Yimidhirr word

-^

ono

(a fish: aka wahoo)

-^

“good to eat” (Hawaiian)

-^

livid

as in “livid with rage”

-^

pale

or

red

Last Time

-^

(Section 5.5) (Topic of Homework 4)

-^

Plural and Mass Terms

-^

Godehard Link

: Lattice structure

-^

Example

: possible worlds (w1,..,w4)

-^

a mapping from world to a set of individuals

•^

w

{A,B}

horse(a). horse(b).

•^

w

{B,C}

horse(b). horse(c).

•^

w

{A,B,C}

horse(a). horse(b). horse(c).

•^

w

Last Time

•^

W3:

  • meaning of

horse:

{A,B,C}

  • meaning of

horses

: {A+B,A+C,B+C,A+B+C}

•^

Lattice structure representation:

A+B+C

A+B

B+C

A+C

A

B

C

horses(X). horse(X).

threehorses^ chinese

ma

ma(X).

docsity.com

Computing Quantity

-^

One idea (

later to be modified for Chapter 6

–^

phrase

meaning

–^

furniture

furniture(X).

–^

piece of furniture

furniture(X), X is bounded.

–^

three pieces of furniture -

requires X to be bounded

–^

|X: furniture(X) | = 3, X is bounded.

–^

*three furniture

| X: furniture(X) | doesn’t compute

–^

Chinese:

ma

is like furniture, doesn’t come with bounded property

–^

phrase

meaning

–^

horses

horses(X), X is bounded.

–^

three horses

| X: horses(X) | = 3, X is bounded.

Kinds

•^

(Section 5.6)

•^

Bare plurals

:^

relation to quantification

  • occur on their own, i.e. without some determiner or quantifier

•^

Examples:– (15) Horses are rare– (16) Horses are mammals– (17) Horses have tails– (18) Horses give birth to their foals in the spring– (19) Horses were galloping across the plain

•^

What is different about the meaning of horses in (15)–(19)?

Kinds

-^

Semantics:–

Gn(P) true of a kind iff P is true of typical instances of P

-^

here: iff =

if and only if

-^

Idea: stage-level–

object-level property

-^

not a permanent property

-^

applies during a time-slice

-^

Example–

(19) Horses were galloping across the plain

-^

predicate

were galloping across the plain

is stage-level

–^

coercion or shift needed to apply to some individual:

Silver

-^

Other predicates? Name some Adjectives

Pronouns and Anaphors

•^

(Section 5.7)

•^

Example:– (25) Shelby is cute. He is a Keeshond.– predicate saturation

•^

Referent of pronoun not always fully determined:– may be ambiguous

•^

Example: (ambiguity)– (26) Shelby met Bucky. He sniffed him.– possibilities for

he

and

him