Statistical Methods: Understanding Probabilities in Surveys and Polls - Prof. Mary Hartz, Study notes of Data Analysis & Statistical Methods

A lecture from a statistical methods course (sta100) focusing on assessing the likelihood of events in surveys or polls using the example of determining the proportion of 'lefties' versus 'righties' among accountants. The lecture introduces the concept of a biased coin and the use of conditional probability to calculate probabilities based on certain conditions, such as gender, in a sample. The document also covers the calculation of probabilities for events that have already occurred, such as a bus leaving late and arriving on time.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-ics
koofers-user-ics 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
STA100 STA100 Statistical Methods Lecture 7
1 | P a g e
Text Sections: 4.2
So far we have seen that, at least for some simple situations, we can develop
mathematical tools to assess the likelihood that an event will occur. We now want to
start pushing our techniques towards situations we are likely to encounter when we
want to do surveys or polls.
For example, suppose you have heard that “left brain” versus “right brain” issues may
be different for accountants as compared with artists. So, your research question might
be to see what the proportion of “lefties” versus “righties” is like for accountants. How do
we think about this situation?
The model we will use is based upon a coin toss with a biased coin. Since there are
many accountants in America, walking up to one of them and asking “Are you a leftie?”
is a lot like tossing a coin and seeing whether it comes up HEADS, especially if we ask
these accountants randomly in a simple random sample (remember this idea from the
first chapter. We think of this like having all the accountants in America write their
names on pieces of paper and then putting these names in a big hat and choosing, say
10 of them).
Some questions come up immediately:
1. Since we cannot, in a sample, be sure to get the correct proportion (i.e. the
sample proportion will not generally match the population proportion) how close
do we need to be?
2. Once we know that we need to be within, say, 3% of the true proportion of
accountant lefties, how many people do we need in our sample? (The more the
better, of course, but after awhile this gets expensive and time consuming).
3. Since we cannot be sure that we’ll be within 3% of the true number, how
confident can we be that our estimate will be within 3% of the true number?
So, how to proceed? Let’s first try to understand coin tosses (which are easy to think
about and mathematically “clean”), then come back to samples.
Think about a simple case where we toss a fair coin 4 times. Recall our sample space:
HHHH
HTHH
THHH
TTHH
HHHT
HTHT
THHT
TTHT
HHTH
HTTH
THTH
TTTH
HHTT
HTTT
THTT
TTTT
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Statistical Methods: Understanding Probabilities in Surveys and Polls - Prof. Mary Hartz and more Study notes Data Analysis & Statistical Methods in PDF only on Docsity!

Text Sections: 4.

So far we have seen that, at least for some simple situations, we can develop mathematical tools to assess the likelihood that an event will occur. We now want to start pushing our techniques towards situations we are likely to encounter when we want to do surveys or polls.

For example, suppose you have heard that “left brain” versus “right brain” issues may be different for accountants as compared with artists. So, your research question might be to see what the proportion of “lefties” versus “righties” is like for accountants. How do we think about this situation?

The model we will use is based upon a coin toss with a biased coin. Since there are many accountants in America, walking up to one of them and asking “Are you a leftie?” is a lot like tossing a coin and seeing whether it comes up HEADS, especially if we ask these accountants randomly in a simple random sample (remember this idea from the first chapter. We think of this like having all the accountants in America write their names on pieces of paper and then putting these names in a big hat and choosing, say 10 of them).

Some questions come up immediately:

  1. Since we cannot, in a sample , be sure to get the correct proportion (i.e. the sample proportion will not generally match the population proportion ) how close do we need to be?
  2. Once we know that we need to be within, say, 3% of the true proportion of accountant lefties, how many people do we need in our sample? (The more the better, of course, but after awhile this gets expensive and time consuming).
  3. Since we cannot be sure that we’ll be within 3% of the true number, how confident can we be that our estimate will be within 3% of the true number?

So, how to proceed? Let’s first try to understand coin tosses (which are easy to think about and mathematically “clean”), then come back to samples.

Think about a simple case where we toss a fair coin 4 times. Recall our sample space:

HHHH HTHH THHH TTHH

HHHT HTHT THHT TTHT

HHTH HTTH THTH TTTH

HHTT HTTT THTT TTTT

Since our coin is fair, we can find the probability of obtaining 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 HEADS just by counting. Use the Classical Notion of Probability to say that, since there are 16=2^4 possible outcomes, the probability that in our sample we will have, say 3 HEADS is

We can do this for each of these to obtain

Number of HEADS

probability 1/16 4/16 6/16 4/16 1/

If you are very patient you can repeat this procedure for a sample of size but after that it gets a little rough. What can we do for a sample of size 10? Of size 500? Here’s the first idea we can use.

Conditional Probability Very often we would like to compute the probability of an

event in the presence of knowledge about some other, perhaps related, event. For example, suppose that you ask individuals, at random, in the Mall, whether or not they own a snowmobile. Do you expect to get the same frequency of YES responses if:

  1. You are in the Mohawk Valley? (Lots of snow, plenty of space.)
  2. You are in the center of Manhattan? (Much less snow, much less space.)

To see how we might assign probabilities conditionally consider the following example. One of our students, Mary P., did a fine job collecting blood pressure and temperature data for men and for women in a sample at her workplace (Nice Job, MP!) If we consider just gender and whether the systolic blood pressure is 120 or above versus less than 120 we get the following table:

MEN WOMEN

120 or ABOVE 5 8 13

BELOW 120 5 2 7

10 10 20

Suppose you randomly select an individual from this sample. What is the probability that their systolic BP is 120 or more?

Since there are 20 people in the class, and since the number of individuals with 120 or more BP is 13, this probability is.

Example : Suppose you are going to take a bus trip from Utica to Buffalo. The bus

company has furnished you with the following data:

prob(Leave On Time) = prob(LOT) = 0.

prob(Arrive On Time) = prob(AOT) = 0. prob(Leave on Time and Arrive On Time) = 0.

Calculate the following:

  1. Your bus has just left on time. What is the probability that it will arrive on time? Since our bus has just left on time we will condition on that probability. To get the probability that it will arrive on time given that we leave on time we set up our formula just like before:

It seems like your chances of arriving on time are enhanced if you leave on time.

  1. Your bus has just left late. What is the probability that it will arrive on time?

This is a little trickier, so it’s best to think in terms of a picture here. Remember that we can draw a Venn diagram to help us.

Region

Leave on Time Arrive on Time

Region Region4 Region

Region 1 represents neither Arriving on Time nor Leaving on Time Region 2 represents not Arriving on Time but Leaving on Time

Region 3 represents Arriving on Time but not Leaving on Time Region 4 represents Arriving on Time and Leaving on Time

What are the sizes of these regions? We have been told that the event “Leave on Time” has a “size” or probability of 0.80. That is, the total size of regions 2 and 4 together is 0.80. We also know that the size of region 4 “Leave on Time and Arrive On Time” is 0.65. Since regions 2 and 4 do not overlap we must have that the size of Region 2 is 0.80-0.65 = 0.15. So, the probability that we Leave on Time but do not Arrive on Time is 0.15.

Work the same way to get the probability of Region 3: “Arriving on Time but not Leaving on Time”. – Region 4 together with Region 3 make up the event Arrive on Time. So,

Looking back on our numbers this means that

And so

How large is Region 1? We know that the 4 non-overalpping regions have sizes that must add up to 1 (the size of our sample space) so

It is not very likely to leave late and also to arrive late.

Back to our question. Your bus has just left late. What is the probability that it will

arrive on time? We can now see that