

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A comprehensive overview of the concept of confounding in epidemiological studies. It covers the definition of confounding, its sources, the effects it can have on the true association between an exposure and a disease, and the various methods used to identify and control for confounding factors. The document delves into the characteristics of a confounder, the criteria it must meet, and the different techniques employed to address confounding, such as randomization, matching, standardization, and stratified analysis. It also discusses the limitations and pros and cons of these methods. This detailed examination of confounding is highly relevant for students and researchers in the fields of epidemiology, public health, and biostatistics, as it equips them with the necessary knowledge to design and interpret epidemiological studies accurately.
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


confounding - Correct answer-Which of the following can be thought of as a failure of the comparison group to reflect the counterfactual experience of the exposed group? systematic difference difference b/w groups being compared that distorts the true association b/w an exposure and dz; an *inherent characteristic of the population -occurs when the risk of dz in the unexposed group does not equal the risk of dz in the exposed group had they been unexposed which means that the difference in dz risk b/w the exposed and unexposed is due to factors other than just the exposure Confounding Sources - Correct answer-1. experimental and cohort: occurs whenthe exposed and unexposed groups differ by more than just the exposure, they differ by a third variable