

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The implementation of a team structure for a consulting business. It explains the benefits of this structure, such as improved critical thinking and efficiency, and how it can be combined with the functions factor to group employees based on function and skill level. The document also discusses the chain of command factor, centralized vs decentralized decision making, and the level of formality within the team structure. It concludes with a discussion of contingency theory and the growth plan for the consulting business.
Typology: Thesis
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


D078 Task 1 A1. Benny’s consulting business will implement the team structure. This structure allows the employees to work together in groups that blends their skill sets together and work off each other’s strengths all while efficiently working toward a common goal. Multiple teams can focus on helping one business at a time, giving them the time and focus needed to give a proper assessment. Allowing teams to focus on one business at a time will improve critical thinking, increase efficiency and decrease confusion. A2. Team structure and the functions factor would go together like mashed potatoes and gravy. I have already interviewed and selected my college interns and made my selections based on work styles and complementary skills. Functions builds on this further by grouping the employees based on function, knowledge, skill levels and allows creative thinking. The functions factor gives specific roles and makes everyone accountable. Leading a team structure in a functions factor will work well as the business grows. There is a chance that functional departments could cause some problems down the line as departments grow. It will be important to make sure employees don’t lose sight of the big picture and overall company goals. Chain of command factor makes who is in charge and goals crystal clear. Teams would still be formed but roles within the team would be more certain with knowing who directly to report to. Team members would always know where they stand in the hierarchy. According to the textbook this hierarchy acts as a control mechanism for making sure the right people do the right things at the right time. Decisions can be made quicker in the chain of command with only one boss or manager in charge. Teams will work together as equals and any differences can be settled by a department supervisor or manager. If team members are unsure about more important business decisions or human resource issues they can go to department supervisors as well. Centralized or decentralized factors is how major decision making is decided. One of the biggest benefits to being highly centralized is better efficiency and the downside is to many levels of bureaucracy. Centralized would allow the consulting business to set objectives for managers and team members to follow. Decentralized factors could eventually lead to people not being able to agree on what’s the best decision for the business.
Level of formality within the team structure will remain somewhat informal early in the consulting business’s life. Being on a first name basis with everyone will make the business more cohesive and ideals flow more freely. With the business being newly formed efforts are better spent towards the innovation needs of the 30 local businesses instead of formalizing an organizational chart that depicts each management level. With the consulting business currently being less than ten employees, it is important for everyone to bring a certain level of leadership and responsibility whether they have a formal title or not. In time roles and responsibilities will become more defined. With the business at its current size, I don’t foresee business decisions taking too long or a disconnect between managers and employees with this level of fomality. B1. Contingency/situational or the decision theory, focuses on ongoing interconnection between the operating environment and all organizational structures according to the textbook. This theory pushes the ideas of rationality and linear adaption to environmental changes, especially management. With the consulting business being in its infancy, a theory that promotes concepts of rationality and linear change makes sense. Looking to assess the sustainability of 30 businesses, share those results to stakeholders to generate feedback and put those proposals into motion will require linear growth and improved management efficiency and accountability. Contingency theory will make sure management improves and gives the employees the road map they need to succeed. This theory seems to support a business that has high goals and large growth potential. C1. Using the team structure as the foundation of the consulting business will allow team members strengths to cover weaknesses. The goal is to implement proposals for 30 businesses and raise our city’s rankings in the “Most Sustainable and Innovative Communities” list from the top 20% of all U.S. communities to the top 10%. To accomplish this goal, we will need to grow steadily throughout the year. Starting with 3 interns and myself we will need to add more teams throughout the year. Interns gain valuable experience over the first 2 months assessing and implement proposals to 4 businesses. Investors in the business community come on board to take leadership roles and we hire more interns and other employees with work experience. By the end of the year, we aim to have 3 to 4 teams consulting with businesses throughout the community and hitting our goal of 30 businesses by the end of the year. Steady growth within the consulting company sees assignment of more formal job titles to managers and a slightly more centralized office. The