Is Charles Robert Darwin wrong?

The natural selection believes that organism genetically mutated from its basic

formation which is what we call evolution. Evolution is the hereditable characteristic on

the biological population as it underwent several process of change1. The concept of

Darwin gives birth to the modern biology. The action and disposition for survival due

from the appearance based from the multifactorial combination of traits and

environmental factor. However genetic mutation generally may cause danger or

destruction to the system of a certain body. One of the major effects of mutation is the

deletion, in which it happens in the production of cancer cell in the body2.

If the human underwent a process of evolution or genetic mutation in its molecular

structure one of the disastrous action that will be done is to delete which is not like them

or their previous forms. The natural selection illustrated that human comes from apes

and are still in existence somewhere in Africa and Southeast Asia3. It would be

impossible for them to live or survive in a changing evolutionary environment where

they could acquire some diseases or be killed or deleted for the survival of others. And

also it is impossible for them not to evolve or more or less to mutate if evolution of man

exists. If that so we are mutants, a derivatives of a certain genetically structured of the

past over billions of years, but humanity is not.

The authority in this world is given to the hands of a man, which made us the

superior among all thing living over the sea, land, and air 4. Man has the ability to

develop, and develop things to other forms, like cross breeding or to modify genetic

structure from existing thing. If man preserves this idea in mind or it is there instinct then

it should also be natural to the apes. If the ape is the ancestor of humanity then they

should the most advance technology than us or in some sort equally the same to

humankind in terms of developing other things. They should not be left behind.

The natural selection may have been significant in the modern biology such as

classification but it may not be absolutely not possible in the origin of mankind due to

lack of evidences. The lack of evidence means that man is not comparatively the same

to the species being specified by Darwin which is not of us and not like us. Biblically

speaking that animals are first created, before man, technically they may be older than

human existence but not that so long. As from the book of Isaiah, 1 day in the world

may be 1000 years in heaven, or 1 day in heaven may be 1000 years in world.

I strongly disagree to the principle of Darwin for it is questionable in terms of origin of

the apes or other organism. Given that spontaneous theory is now being disprove which

in own opinion can be correlated by others to this theory due to the first origin process.

Pascal once said that “if I will not believe in God and find out that He is true then I

will suffer from the punishment of hell, while if I believe in God and find out that He is

not true, then there is nothing that will be happen to me” (re-phrase). I believe in the

theory of God’s Creation given the fact that He created everything and prepare, before

man, for our living (para wala na tayong hanapin pa). Everything that happens is

according to God’s perfect plan. Human is one of a kind creation of God, for we are

created in accordance to His image.

Once again Darwin is wrong. And also, I prefer to have the Image of God than to

have the image of an apes.