Understanding Deductive Reasoning & Logical Fallacies in Reasoning, Slides of Brain and Cognitive Science

An introduction to deductive reasoning, focusing on propositional and syllogistic logic, logical connectives, and common fallacies. It covers rules such as modus ponens and modus tollens, incorrect inferences like affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent, and wason's 4-card task. Additionally, it discusses hypothesis testing and difficulties in reasoning, including negation, misinterpretation of premises, failure to consider all possibilities, and content and believability effects.

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 11/22/2012

nagam-ram
nagam-ram 🇮🇳

4.6

(63)

229 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Deductive Reasoning
Propositional reasoning: drawing conclusions
from premises (propositions)
Logical connectives
AND
OR
NOT
IF-THEN
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Deductive Reasoning & Logical Fallacies in Reasoning and more Slides Brain and Cognitive Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Deductive Reasoning

  • Propositional reasoning: drawing conclusions from premises (propositions)
  • Logical connectives
    • AND
    • OR
    • NOT
    • IF-THEN

Some correct inferences

  • Modus ponens

If P, then Q P ____________ Therefore, Q

  • Modus tollens

If P, then Q Not Q _________ Therefore, not P

Wason’s 4-card task

  • Turn over whichever cards are necessary to test the rule: “If a card has a vowel on one side, then it has an even number on the other side.”

A D 4 7

A somewhat simpler task

  • Each card has an age and a drink on it. Turn over as many cards as necessary to test the rule, “If a person is drinking beer, then that person is 21 years of age or older.”

Beer Coke 21 18

Hypothesis testing

  • The string “2, 4, 6” follows the rule. Generate other strings to guess the rule.
  • Confirmation bias (Wason)

Difficulties in reasoning

  • Negation (“not”) adds difficulty
  • Misinterpretation of premises (“All A are B” does not imply that all B are A)
  • Failure to consider all possibilities
  • Content and believability effects