Preparing a Academic Dossier: A Guide for University Faculty, Study notes of Human Resource Management

Guidelines for university faculty on preparing their academic dossier for review. It covers various sections such as letters of evaluation, professional competence and activities, university service, self-evaluation letter, and provides summary points to consider. It also emphasizes the importance of keeping records and discussing teaching in the self-evaluation.

Typology: Study notes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/25/2013

dipendu
dipendu 🇮🇳

4.5

(33)

74 documents

1 / 17

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Researchand/orOtherCreativeActivities(continued)
LettersofEvaluation(notforafourthyearreview)
Internal letters should be requested from knowledgeable
sources, but with regard to the need to preserve a pool of
faculty from which a review committee can be formed if
necessary. Internal referees should only be selected if
they can provide special information not available from
other sources.
The candidate should be given the opportunity to
indicate potential referees who might have a prejudice.
YOUR DOSSIER
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Preparing a Academic Dossier: A Guide for University Faculty and more Study notes Human Resource Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Research and/or Other Creative Activities (continued)

Letters of Evaluation (not for a fourth year review)

Internal letters should be requested from knowledgeable sources, but with regard to the need to preserve a pool of faculty from which a review committee can be formed if necessary. Internal referees should only be selected if they can provide special information not available from other sources.

The candidate should be given the opportunity to indicate potential referees who might have a prejudice.

YOUR DOSSIER

Professional Competence and Activities

This is a category in which the actual

activities vary markedly from discipline to

discipline. It is often helpful to include a

brief explanation of what constitutes

pertinent activity in the given discipline

(e.g., editorship, consulting), followed by a

description of the candidate’s activities,

their significance, and how the candidate’s

level of activity compares to the norm.

Your self statement will be very important

YOUR DOSSIER

Self‐Evaluation Letter

Many departments ask the candidate to

place in the file a written statement of the

candidate’s own assessment of

achievements in teaching, research, and

service since the last review. It can help all

reviewing agencies to understand the

candidate’s philosophy of teaching,

construction of new courses, the nature of

collaborative research, etc. Guard against

overlong self‐statements. These letters can

be very informative but they should be

kept to a modest length (3 to 5 pages) and

should not serve as a substitute for the

penetrating departmental review.

YOUR DOSSIER

Your best advocate in making your case is

likely to be you. Your self‐statement can

be pivotal in the CAP review, where the

members do not know you.

•Self-statement 3-5 pages (but check with your department).. The self-statement is the only opportunity for you to say something about yourself in your own words.

•Mentoring form (the candidate needs to meet with the mentor at least twice/year). Take the initiative on this – don’t depend on your department to “push” this!!

•Peer evaluations (either forms or letters, if forms are not available). These should be solicited by the dept. Ask your chair; is s/he doesn’t do it, ask peer evaluators to send letters regarding your teaching to the chair, for your dossier.

•Student evaluations (forms are really useful when comments are included; letters can also be solicited to bolster the file).Be aggressive about this as well – if the dept doesn’t do it, solicit letters to be sent by students, post docs, fellows.

•Candidates can now ask ORUs/unit Directors to provide comments for the dossier if the candidate is engaged in interdisciplinary work that is in the area of the ORU. Don’t abuse this, but if there is truly interdisciplinary work in you research history, ask the dept chair (or responsible administrator) to solicit such comments for your dossier. The. dept is to contact the director/head of the unit, requesting a statement on the candidate’s participation in interdisciplinary research..

•Only items that actually occurred during the review period should be listed on the data summary pages. So, no pending grants, future presentations, activities when you were a postdoc, etc. These can be mentioned in the self-statement or CV.

•The bibliography for the data summary pages should be categorized – peer-reviewed papers separate from books and abstracts and so on.

SOME SUMMARY POINTS TO THINK ABOUT

BE SURE TO INDICATE THE NUMBER OF LECTURES YOU GIVE, PBLs YOU MEET WITH, LABS YOU SUPERVISE. IT IS IMPORTRANT THAT YOU DISCUSS YOUR TEACHING IN YOUR SELF EVALUATION, AND THAT THE INFORMATION HERE AND IN THE SELF EVALUATION AGREE.

REMEMBER, YOU CAN PUT ANYTHING YOU THIS APPORPRIATE

IN HERE. TUTORING STUDENTS FROM A CLASS IN AN INFORMAL

WAY, OFFICE HOURS, PhD, POST DOC, FELLOW ONE‐ON‐ONE MENTORING, SITTING ON Ph.D. ADVANCEMENT TO CANDIDACY EXAMS.

START KEEPING THIS RECORD RIGHT AWAY!! DEPARTMENTAL

LIBRARY COMMITTEE? SEMINAR SERIES? GRAD SELECTION?

WON’T BE LIKELY TO HAVE TOO MUCH SERVICE HERE….

AGAIN, START KEEPING THE RECORDS! SPOKE AT YOUR KID’S

SCHOOL ABOUT SCIENCE? SAT ON A SCIENCE FAIR JUDGING PANEL?

(IF YOU HAVEN’T DONE THESE SORTS OF THINGS, START THINKING

ABOUT IT)

VOLENTEERED AT THE FOOD BANK? PUT IT IN!!

I WAS AN L.A. COUNTY “CALL FIRE FIGHTER” FOR TWELVE YEARS.

WENT INTO EVERY PROMOTION FILE.

START KEEPING THIS RECORD RIGHT AWAY!! IT WON’T MEAN

MUCH IN A FOURTH YEAR REVIEW, OR ASSIST‐ASSOC PROF;

RESEARCH IS THE IMPORTANT THING. BUT IT CAN’T HURT…

START KEEPING THIS RECORD RIGHT AWAY!! IT WON’T MEAN

MUCH IN A FOURTH YEAR REVIEW, OR ASSIST‐ASSOC PROF;

RESEARCH IS THE IMPORTANT THING. FOR A GOOD JOURNAL, IT

WILL INDICATE SOME DEGREE OF PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION.

START KEEPING THIS RECORD RIGHT AWAY!! IT WON’T MEAN

MUCH IN A FOURTH YEAR REVIEW, OR ASSIST‐ASSOC PROF;

RESEARCH IS THE IMPORTANT THING. BUT IT CAN’T HURT…

REMEMBER, YOU CAN ADD ANYTHING YOU WANT. JUST KEEP

YOUR RECORDS. GIVING INVITED SEMINARS AND INVITED

LECTURES AT MAJOR SOCIETY MEETINGS IS A STRONG INDICATOR

OF PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RECOGNITION. I

ADVISE MY MENTEES TO HAVE THEIR FRIENDS AT OTHER

INSTITUTIONS TO INVITE THEM – SO THEY CAN MEET INFLUENTIAL

PEOPLE AND LET OTHERS KNOW ABOUT THEIR WORK.

NOTE THIS OPPORTUNITY. DON’T ABUSE

NOTE THIS OPPORTUNITY. YOU CAN LOOK AT THE FILE BEFORE DEPT REVIEW. YOU CAN ADD COMMENTS AND MATERIAL. DON’T ABUSE

READ THIS PAGE, AND FOLLOW ITS INSTRUCTIONS!! IT TELLS YOU

HOW TO FORMAT YOUR BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE DOSSIER.

YOUR SELF‐STATEMENT

TEACHING

My own perspective on this is to first provide a statement about how you feel about the importance of teaching, then to follow that with your philosophy of teaching. For example, I point out that I teach medical students and graduate students with different objectives, and with different methodologies. The important point, however, is for the review committees to know (1) that you do an adequate amount of teaching and (2) that the quality of your teaching is good. But I think revealing your motivations is a good thing.

Then, of course, you want to quantify your teaching contributions by detailing the courses in which you have participated, the numbers of lectures you give, the topics you covered, how you approach the subjects, new courses, etc. Include mentoring grad students, post‐docs, fellows, others.

I think it is also quite reasonable to indicate what impact you think you had in the course.

Be sure that the file contains your student evaluations and your peer evaluations. When you review the file with your administrator for the department, ask if these docs are present.

If a student, fellow, etc sent a note of special thanks, you can – as you know – see that it is included in the file.

YOUR SELF‐STATEMENT

SERVICE

This will not be a very important part of the review; if your chair/division chief has done a good job, s/he will have protected you from sitting on too many committees.

However, if you have been on any search committees, participated in any department committees, etc, do put them into the self‐statement. Community service counts some here, but institutional service (to UCLA) or service to the scientific community – organizing a meeting, sitting on a grant review panel, etc. should go into your statement.

GOOD

LUCK IN

THE

FUTURE!!