Parity and Angular Momentum in Harmonic Oscillator: Week 9 Discussion Solutions, Assignments of Quantum Physics

Solutions to week 9 discussion questions in physics 486 course. Topics covered include the commutator of position and momentum operators, parity of the ground and first excited states of the harmonic oscillator, and compatibility of angular momentum and parity. Students will learn how to calculate commutators and parity in the context of quantum mechanics.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/16/2009

koofers-user-mic-1
koofers-user-mic-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 486 Discussion Week 9
Solution
1) You saw in lecture that the parity and position operators,
ˆ
P
and
ˆ
x
, don’t commute:
ˆ
P,ˆ
x
!
"#
$=%2ˆ
xˆ
P
. One can use it to derive a very useful relationship among the harmonic
oscillator energy states. You’ll see later that the same analysis can be applied to hydrogen
atom states.
a) What is the commutator of
ˆ
P
and
ˆ
p
(the momentum operator)? This is most easily done
in the position basis (similar to what was done in lecture).
Use
ˆ
px=!i!"
"x
to obtain
ˆ
P,ˆ
p
!
"#
$=%2ˆ
pˆ
P
.
Now consider the 3-D isotropic harmonic oscillator.
b) What is the parity of its ground state?
It’s just a 3-D gaussian,
e!r2
, so the parity is even.
c) The x-raising operator is
. We don’t care about the constants, so I’ve
lumped them into the c’s. Calculate the commutator,
ˆ
P,ˆ
ax
!
"#
$
. The y and z operators
behave similarly.
ˆ
P,ˆ
ax
!
"#
$=%2ˆ
ax
ˆ
P
d) Use this result to calculate the parity of the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator.
Does it matter whether
nx,ny,nz
( )
=1, 0, 0
( )
, 0,1, 0
( )
, or 0, 0,1
( )
?
We want to evaluate
ˆ
Pˆ
ax
0
( )
. From the commutator, this is
!ˆ
ax
ˆ
P0
( )
=!ˆ
ax
0
.
Thus, the parity is odd. This is the case for all of the raising operators.
e) Write a general formula for the parity of an arbitrary state,
nx,ny,nz
( )
.
ˆ
P nxnynz=!1
( )
nx+ny+nz
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Parity and Angular Momentum in Harmonic Oscillator: Week 9 Discussion Solutions and more Assignments Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Physics 486 Discussion Week 9

Solution

1) You saw in lecture that the parity and position operators,

P and

x , don’t commute:

P ,

x

x

P. One can use it to derive a very useful relationship among the harmonic

oscillator energy states. You’ll see later that the same analysis can be applied to hydrogen

atom states.

a) What is the commutator of

P and

p (the momentum operator)? This is most easily done

in the position basis (similar to what was done in lecture).

Use

p

x

=! i!

"

" x

to obtain

P ,

p

p

P.

Now consider the 3-D isotropic harmonic oscillator.

b) What is the parity of its ground state?

It’s just a 3-D gaussian,

e

! r

2

, so the parity is even.

c) The x - raising operator is

a

x

= c

1

x! ic

2

p

x

. We don’t care about the constants, so I’ve

lumped them into the c ’s. Calculate the commutator,

P ,

a

x

. The y and z operators

behave similarly.

P ,

a

x

a

x

† ˆ

P

d) Use this result to calculate the parity of the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator.

Does it matter whether n

x

, n

y

, n

z

= ( 1 , 0 , 0 ), ( 0 , 1 , 0 ), or ( 0 , 0 , 1 )?

We want to evaluate

P

a

x

. From the commutator, this is!

a

x

† ˆ

P 0

a

x

Thus, the parity is odd. This is the case for all of the raising operators.

e) Write a general formula for the parity of an arbitrary state,

n

x

, n

y

, n

z

P n

x

n

y

n

z

n x

  • n y

  • n z

2) This is classical physics: How does angular momentum,

L =

r!

p , behave under a parity

transformation,

r! "

r? In order to answer this question, you need to use the definition of

the cross product,

i!

j =

k and cyclic permutations. Given this result, do you think that

angular momentum and parity are or are not compatible observables?

Both

p and

x change sign under a parity transormation. Therefore

L

does not. (That’s

why it is called an axial vector.) If you don’t like this argument, write out the components

expllicitly. Each is a sum of products of pairs of vector components and therefore does not

change sign.

The invariance of

L under a parity transformation implies that it is a compatible observable.

Note that neither

p nor

x is compatible with

P.