



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
these documents Contain lecture notes
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Chapter 3: Pavlovian Conditioning Who is Ivan pavlov? ➢ “Experimenter from head to foot” (Wells, 1956) ➢ Russian physiologist studying the digestive system ➢ Focusing on what substance helped to break food down into chemicals that can be then absorbed into the blood ➢ Developed method to precisely measure saliva production in dogs What is serendipity in science? ➢ Began observing dogs would salivate before receiving food ○ “It is as if the glands possessed a kind of intelligence”(Cuny, 1962) ○ Psychic secretions/reflexes” caused by thoughts, memories, wishes of the animal What is pavlovian conditioning? ➢ Also known as Pavlovian, classical, respondent conditioning, S-S learning ➢ Based on physiological responses to environmental stimulation ➢ Relationship between antecedent stimuli What is respondent behavior? ➢ Reflex: a relationship between a specific event and a simple response to that event ➢ Involves autonomic nervous system: ○ Pupil contraction/dilation ○ Startle response ○ Heart rate ○ Respiration ○ Dry mouth ○ Muscle tension ➢ Two types: ○ Unconditional reflexes (UR)- ■ hereditary, occur in all members of a species, usually permanent ○ Conditional reflexes (CR) ■ Acquired and not present at birth. It Depends on experience. What is the classical conditioning paradigm? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus (US) →Unconditioned response(UR) ■ Meat powder – > Salivation ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus (NS) + (US) → UR ○ Metronome + Meat powder → Salivation ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus (CS) → Conditioned response (CR)
■ Metronome → Salivation (CR) What is the paradigm for Pavlovian conditioning? ○ Pavolv’s study: ■ US → UR ● Meat powder → salvation ■ NS+US → UR ● Metronome + meat powder → salivation ■ NS becomes CS ● Metronome becomes CS ■ CS → CR ● Metronome → salivation What is taste aversion with conditioning? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus → Unconditioned response ■ (US) → (UR) ● Stomach flu (virus) → Vomit/Nausea ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus → Unconditioned response ■ (NS) + (US) → (UR) ● Frozen yogurt virus → Vomit/Nausea ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus → Conditioned response ■ (CS) → (CR) ● Frozen yogurt → Vomit/Nausea What is higher-order conditioning? ➢ Pair NSs with an already established CS ➢ Not paired with US ➢ Staats & Staats (1957) Paired “YOF” and ➢ “XEH” with pleasant and unpleasant ➢ words ➢ Words are naturally paired with real CSs ➢ The emotional power of words What is respondent conditioning?
○ If x then y (prediction) ➢ Will the CS predicts US ○ Metronome was ticking, the dog always got food ○ Metronome not ticking, the dog never got food ➢ Conditioning is not just a matter of pairing stimuli ➢ Contiguity – the time between US and CS ○ Time between CS and US ○ Food poisoning ➢ Interstimulus interval (ISI) ○ The most effective procedures are trace and dela How do we measure conditioning stimulus features? ➢ Compound features ➢ Overshadowing ○ use one "weak" and one "strong" CS ■ CS1+CS2 →US ○ reaction to weaker stimulus is blotted out, overshadowed, by stronger CS How does one measure prior experience? ➢ Number of CS- US pairings ➢ Previous experience with CS ○ Blocking: Previously conditioned stimulus “blocks” conditioning to a new stimulus (Kamin, 1969) ■ Example: tone CS paired with light àshock US. Then tone + light. Light alone fails to become CS. ➢ Previous experience with CS ○ More experience with a stimulus, harder to establish it as a CS (latent inhibition) ■ Examples, taste aversion to beer, water, vs. gold schlager ➢ Stimulus features/intensity ○ Genetic predisposition to learn certain CS-US associations ○ Temperament/stress Why aren't all stimuli equally effective? ➢ Strong stimuli tend to “overshadow ” weak ones ○ Loud vs quiet, bright vs dim, hot vs warm, etc. ➢ Some stimuli are particularly effective for certain species ○ Spiders, snakes, bees vs. penguins, dogs, turtle ○ Rats’ smell vs. lizard’s taste vs. birds’ sight ➢ Novel NS can become CS faster than familiar NS ○ Something unfamiliar more likely to be strongly paired ○ Something familiar less likely to be paired ➢ Conditioning can be more difficult with: ○ Older organisms ○ Excitability (temperament)
○ Stressful arrangements What is the classical conditioning paradigm? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus (US) → Unconditioned response(UR) ■ Meat powder → Salivation ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus (NS) + (US) → UR ■ Metronome + Meat powder → Salivation ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus (CS) àConditioned response (CR) ■ Metronome → Salivation (CR) ➢ Extinction: ○ Repeated CS presentations without US → Disappearance of CR ■ Metronome → No salivation What is extinction? ➢ Respondent extinction involves repeatedly presenting the CS without the US. ➢ Each extinction trial (CS no US) results in a decrease in CR ➢ Spontaneous recovery: ○ Spontaneous recovery: A sudden increase in strength of the CR after extinction has occurred without any additional CS–US pairings ➢ Is not forgetting ➢ The CS-US contingency is dissolved