Pavlovian Conditioning: Principles and Applications in Psychology, Lecture notes of History

these documents Contain lecture notes

Typology: Lecture notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 05/02/2023

alexis-cooley
alexis-cooley 🇺🇸

4 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Chapter 3: Pavlovian Conditioning
Who is Ivan pavlov?
“Experimenter from head to foot” (Wells, 1956)
Russian physiologist studying the digestive system
Focusing on what substance helped to break food down into chemicals that can be then absorbed
into the blood
Developed method to precisely measure saliva production in dogs
What is serendipity in science?
Began observing dogs would salivate before receiving food
“It is as if the glands possessed a kind of intelligence”(Cuny, 1962)
Psychic secretions/reflexes” caused by thoughts, memories, wishes of the animal
What is pavlovian conditioning?
Also known as Pavlovian, classical, respondent conditioning, S-S learning
Based on physiological responses to environmental stimulation
Relationship between antecedent stimuli
What is respondent behavior?
Reflex: a relationship between a specific event and a simple response to that event
Involves autonomic nervous system:
Pupil contraction/dilation
Startle response
Heart rate
Respiration
Dry mouth
Muscle tension
Two types:
Unconditional reflexes (UR)-
hereditary, occur in all members of a species, usually permanent
Conditional reflexes (CR)
Acquired and not present at birth. It Depends on experience.
What is the classical conditioning paradigm?
Before conditioning:
Unconditioned stimulus (US) →Unconditioned response(UR)
Meat powder – > Salivation
During conditioning:
Neutral stimulus (NS) + (US) → UR
Metronome + Meat powder → Salivation
Following conditioning:
Conditioned stimulus (CS) → Conditioned response (CR)
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Pavlovian Conditioning: Principles and Applications in Psychology and more Lecture notes History in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 3: Pavlovian Conditioning Who is Ivan pavlov? ➢ “Experimenter from head to foot” (Wells, 1956) ➢ Russian physiologist studying the digestive system ➢ Focusing on what substance helped to break food down into chemicals that can be then absorbed into the blood ➢ Developed method to precisely measure saliva production in dogs What is serendipity in science? ➢ Began observing dogs would salivate before receiving food ○ “It is as if the glands possessed a kind of intelligence”(Cuny, 1962) ○ Psychic secretions/reflexes” caused by thoughts, memories, wishes of the animal What is pavlovian conditioning? ➢ Also known as Pavlovian, classical, respondent conditioning, S-S learning ➢ Based on physiological responses to environmental stimulation ➢ Relationship between antecedent stimuli What is respondent behavior? ➢ Reflex: a relationship between a specific event and a simple response to that event ➢ Involves autonomic nervous system: ○ Pupil contraction/dilation ○ Startle response ○ Heart rate ○ Respiration ○ Dry mouth ○ Muscle tension ➢ Two types: ○ Unconditional reflexes (UR)- ■ hereditary, occur in all members of a species, usually permanent ○ Conditional reflexes (CR) ■ Acquired and not present at birth. It Depends on experience. What is the classical conditioning paradigm? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus (US) →Unconditioned response(UR) ■ Meat powder – > Salivation ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus (NS) + (US) → UR ○ Metronome + Meat powder → Salivation ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus (CS) → Conditioned response (CR)

■ Metronome → Salivation (CR) What is the paradigm for Pavlovian conditioning? ○ Pavolv’s study: ■ US → UR ● Meat powder → salvation ■ NS+US → UR ● Metronome + meat powder → salivation ■ NS becomes CS ● Metronome becomes CS ■ CS → CR ● Metronome → salivation What is taste aversion with conditioning? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus → Unconditioned response ■ (US) → (UR) ● Stomach flu (virus) → Vomit/Nausea ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus → Unconditioned response ■ (NS) + (US) → (UR) ● Frozen yogurt virus → Vomit/Nausea ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus → Conditioned response ■ (CS) → (CR) ● Frozen yogurt → Vomit/Nausea What is higher-order conditioning? ➢ Pair NSs with an already established CS ➢ Not paired with US ➢ Staats & Staats (1957) Paired “YOF” and ➢ “XEH” with pleasant and unpleasant ➢ words ➢ Words are naturally paired with real CSs ➢ The emotional power of words What is respondent conditioning?

○ If x then y (prediction) ➢ Will the CS predicts US ○ Metronome was ticking, the dog always got food ○ Metronome not ticking, the dog never got food ➢ Conditioning is not just a matter of pairing stimuli ➢ Contiguity – the time between US and CS ○ Time between CS and US ○ Food poisoning ➢ Interstimulus interval (ISI) ○ The most effective procedures are trace and dela How do we measure conditioning stimulus features? ➢ Compound features ➢ Overshadowing ○ use one "weak" and one "strong" CS ■ CS1+CS2 →US ○ reaction to weaker stimulus is blotted out, overshadowed, by stronger CS How does one measure prior experience? ➢ Number of CS- US pairings ➢ Previous experience with CS ○ Blocking: Previously conditioned stimulus “blocks” conditioning to a new stimulus (Kamin, 1969) ■ Example: tone CS paired with light àshock US. Then tone + light. Light alone fails to become CS. ➢ Previous experience with CS ○ More experience with a stimulus, harder to establish it as a CS (latent inhibition) ■ Examples, taste aversion to beer, water, vs. gold schlager ➢ Stimulus features/intensity ○ Genetic predisposition to learn certain CS-US associations ○ Temperament/stress Why aren't all stimuli equally effective? ➢ Strong stimuli tend to “overshadow ” weak ones ○ Loud vs quiet, bright vs dim, hot vs warm, etc. ➢ Some stimuli are particularly effective for certain species ○ Spiders, snakes, bees vs. penguins, dogs, turtle ○ Rats’ smell vs. lizard’s taste vs. birds’ sight ➢ Novel NS can become CS faster than familiar NS ○ Something unfamiliar more likely to be strongly paired ○ Something familiar less likely to be paired ➢ Conditioning can be more difficult with: ○ Older organisms ○ Excitability (temperament)

○ Stressful arrangements What is the classical conditioning paradigm? ➢ Before conditioning: ○ Unconditioned stimulus (US) → Unconditioned response(UR) ■ Meat powder → Salivation ➢ During conditioning: ○ Neutral stimulus (NS) + (US) → UR ■ Metronome + Meat powder → Salivation ➢ Following conditioning: ○ Conditioned stimulus (CS) àConditioned response (CR) ■ Metronome → Salivation (CR) ➢ Extinction: ○ Repeated CS presentations without US → Disappearance of CR ■ Metronome → No salivation What is extinction? ➢ Respondent extinction involves repeatedly presenting the CS without the US. ➢ Each extinction trial (CS no US) results in a decrease in CR ➢ Spontaneous recovery: ○ Spontaneous recovery: A sudden increase in strength of the CR after extinction has occurred without any additional CS–US pairings ➢ Is not forgetting ➢ The CS-US contingency is dissolved