Principles of Engineering Economy: A Comprehensive Guide with Examples, Study notes of Engineering Economy

Principles of Engineering Economy Engineering Economy - Involves the systematic evaluation of economic merits of proposed solutions to engineering problems - It is the study of the desirability of making an investment - Solutions to engineering problems must demonstrate a positive balance of long-term benefits over long-term costs,

Typology: Study notes

2014/2015

Available from 11/16/2022

yacine-ouali
yacine-ouali 🇬🇧

91 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Principles of Engineering Economy
Engineering Economy
- Involves the systematic evaluation of economic
merits of proposed solutions to engineering
problems
- It is the study of the desirability of making an
investment
- Solutions to engineering problems must
demonstrate a positive balance of long-term
benefits over long-term costs, they must also:
o promote the well-being and survival of
an organization,
o embody creative and innovative
technology and ideas,
o permit identification and scrutiny of their
estimated outcomes, and
o translate profitability to the “bottom line”
through a valid and acceptable measure
of merit.
Principles of Engineering Economy
PRINCIPLE 1: DEVELOP THE ALTERNATIVES
- The choice (decision) is among alternatives.
- The alternatives need to be identified and then
defined for subsequent analysis.
PRINCIPLE 2: FOCUS ON THE DIFFERENCES
- Only the differences in expected future
outcomes among the alternatives are relevant to
their comparison and should be considered in
the decision.
PRINCIPLE3: USE A CONSISTENT VIEWPOINT
- The prospective outcomes of the alternatives,
economic and other, should be consistently
developed from a defined viewpoint
(perspective).
PRINCIPLE 4: USE A COMMON UNIT OF MEASURE
- Using a common unit of measurement to
enumerate as many of the prospective
outcomes as possible will simplify the analysis of
alternatives.
PRINCIPLE 5: CONSIDER ALL RELEVANT CRITERIA
- Selection of a preferred alternative (decision
making) requires the use of a criterion (or
several criteria).
- The decision process should consider both the
outcomes enumerated in the monetary unit and
those expressed in some other unit of
measurement or made explicit in a descriptive
manner.
PRINCIPLE 6: MAKE UNCERTAINTY EXPLICIT
- Risk and uncertainty are inherent in estimating
the future outcomes of the alternatives and
should be recognized in their analysis and
comparison.
PRINCIPLE 7 REVISIT YOUR DECISIONS
- Improved decision making results from an
adaptive process; to the extent practicable, initial
projected outcomes of the selected alternative
should be subsequently compared with actual
results achieved
ENGINEERING ECONOMIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
1. Problem recognition, formulation and
evaluation.
2. Development of the feasible alternatives.
3. Development of the outcomes and cash
flows for each alternative.
4. Selection of a criterion (or criteria).
5. Analysis and comparison of the
alternatives.
6. Selection of the preferred alternative.
7. Performance monitoring and post-
evaluation of results.
COST CONCEPTS
- The word cost has meaning that vary in usage.
- Since concepts are ideas generalized from
particular instances or situations, the cost
concepts used in an engineering economy study
will depend on the problem or situation and the
decision to be made.
Fixed, Variable, and Incremental Costs
Fixed Costs unaffected by changes in the activity
level over a feasible range of operations for the capacity
or capability available.
Variable Costs are those associated with an operation
that vary in total with the quantity of output or other
measures of activity level.
Incremental Costs or Incremental Revenue refers to
additional cost or revenue that results from increasing
the output of the system by one (or more) units.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Principles of Engineering Economy: A Comprehensive Guide with Examples and more Study notes Engineering Economy in PDF only on Docsity!

Principles of Engineering Economy Engineering Economy

  • Involves the systematic evaluation of economic merits of proposed solutions to engineering problems
  • It is the study of the desirability of making an investment
  • Solutions to engineering problems must demonstrate a positive balance of long-term benefits over long-term costs, they must also: o promote the well-being and survival of an organization, o embody creative and innovative technology and ideas, o permit identification and scrutiny of their estimated outcomes, and o translate profitability to the “bottom line” through a valid and acceptable measure of merit.

Principles of Engineering Economy

PRINCIPLE 1: DEVELOP THE ALTERNATIVES

  • The choice (decision) is among alternatives.
  • The alternatives need to be identified and then defined for subsequent analysis.

PRINCIPLE 2: FOCUS ON THE DIFFERENCES

  • Only the differences in expected future outcomes among the alternatives are relevant to their comparison and should be considered in the decision.

PRINCIPLE3: USE A CONSISTENT VIEWPOINT

  • The prospective outcomes of the alternatives, economic and other, should be consistently developed from a defined viewpoint (perspective).

PRINCIPLE 4: USE A COMMON UNIT OF MEASURE

  • Using a common unit of measurement to enumerate as many of the prospective outcomes as possible will simplify the analysis of alternatives.

PRINCIPLE 5: CONSIDER ALL RELEVANT CRITERIA

  • Selection of a preferred alternative (decision making) requires the use of a criterion (or several criteria).
  • The decision process should consider both the outcomes enumerated in the monetary unit and those expressed in some other unit of measurement or made explicit in a descriptive manner.

PRINCIPLE 6: MAKE UNCERTAINTY EXPLICIT

  • Risk and uncertainty are inherent in estimating the future outcomes of the alternatives and should be recognized in their analysis and comparison.

P RINCIPLE 7 – REVISIT YOUR DECISIONS

  • Improved decision making results from an adaptive process; to the extent practicable, initial projected outcomes of the selected alternative should be subsequently compared with actual results achieved

ENGINEERING ECONOMIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE

1. Problem recognition, formulation and

evaluation.

2. Development of the feasible alternatives.

3. Development of the outcomes and cash

flows for each alternative.

4. Selection of a criterion (or criteria).

5. Analysis and comparison of the

alternatives.

6. Selection of the preferred alternative.

7. Performance monitoring and post-

evaluation of results.

COST CONCEPTS

  • The word cost has meaning that vary in usage.
  • Since concepts are ideas generalized from particular instances or situations, the cost concepts used in an engineering economy study will depend on the problem or situation and the decision to be made.

Fixed, Variable, and Incremental Costs

Fixed Costs – unaffected by changes in the activity level over a feasible range of operations for the capacity or capability available.

Variable Costs – are those associated with an operation that vary in total with the quantity of output or other measures of activity level.

Incremental Costs or Incremental Revenue – refers to additional cost or revenue that results from increasing the output of the system by one (or more) units.

Direct, Indirect, and Standard Costs

Direct Costs – costs that can be reasonably measured and allocated to a specific output or work activity.

Indirect Costs – costs that are difficult to attribute or allocate to a specific output or work activity (also overhead or burden).

Standard Costs – planned costs per unit of output, established in advance of production or service delivery. They are developed from the anticipated direct labor hours, materials, and overhead categories (with their established costs per unit).

Cash Cost vs. Book Cost

Cash cost – a cost that involves a payment of cash.

Book cost – a cost that does not involve a cash transaction but is reflected in the accounting system. Book costs represent the recovery of past expenditures over a fixed period of time (i.e. depreciation).

Sunk Costs

Sunk Costs – costs that has incurred in the past and has no relevance to estimates of future costs and revenues related to an alternative course of action. These costs should be ignored in the analysis and comparison of alternatives that affect the future.

More common cost terminology

Opportunity cost – the monetary advantage foregone due to limited resources. The cost of the best rejected opportunity.

Life-cycle cost – the summation of all costs related to a product, structure, system, or service during its life span.

PRESENT ECONOMY STUDIES

  • When the influence of time on money is not a significant consideration, cost analyses are usually called present economy studies.
  • When alternatives for accomplishing a specific task are being compared over one year or less.

PRESENT ECONOMY STUDIES

RULE 1:

  • When revenues and other economic benefits are present and vary among alternatives, choose the alternative that maximizes overall profitability based on the number of defect-free units of a product or serviced produced.

RULE 2:

  • When revenues and other economic benefits are not present or are constant among alternatives, consider only the costs and select the alternative that minimizes total cost per defect free unit of product or serviced produced.

Typical Situations involving Present Economy Studies

  • There is no initial investment of capital; only immediate operating costs and other factors involved.

Example:

Assume that you are employed by Company A and are making plans for a business trip. You can travel by commercial aircraft, which will require 3 hours of travel time and the rental of a car at your destination. The other alternative is to travel by automobile, which will take 7 hours.

Here, the basic considerations are the immediate costs, the value of your time, and nonmonetary factors. (i.e., fatigue)

Typical Situations involving Present Economy Studies

  • There is an initial investment of capital, but after this first cost the remaining life-cycle cost is estimated to be the same, or directly proportional to the initial investment. Thus the alternative with the lowest first cost will be the most economical.
  • The differences in the revenues and costs among the alternatives all incur within a limited time period (1 year or less is a general guideline), or any future differences are estimated to remain proportional to those in the first time period. This is often the case when the decision is between alternative materials in manufacturing.

MAKE VERSUS PURCHASE (OUTSOURCE) STUDIES

A company is analyzing a make or buy situation for a component used in several products and the engineering department has developed these data:

Option A: Purchase 10,000 items per year at a fixed price of $8.50 per item. The cost of placing the order is negligible.

Option B: manufacture 10,000 items per year using the available capacity in the factory. Cost estimates are direct materials = $ 5.00 per item and direct labor = $1.50 per item. Overhead is allocated at 200% of direct labor.

Should the item be manufactured or bought?

TRADE-OFFS IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY STUDIES

Two pumps capable of delivering 100hp to an agricultural application are being evaluated in a present economy study. The selected pump will only be utilized for one year, and it will have no market value at the end of the year. Pertinent data are summarized as follows:

If the electric power costs $0.10 per kWh and the pump will be operated 4,000 hours per year, which pump should be chosen? Recall that 1hp = 0.746 kW.