English syntax notes part 2, Lecture notes of English Language

These are notes for english syntax part 2 from book and from lecture.

Typology: Lecture notes

2018/2019

Available from 02/06/2022

miska-vlcejova
miska-vlcejova 🇸🇰

12 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Adverbial modifier
Syntactic classification of Adverbials according to Dušková:
1 Adjuncts (príslovkové určenie začlenené do vetnej stavby) - as Argument or non-Argument member
2 Sentence Adverbials (príslovkové určenie nezačlenené do vetnej stavby) divided into Disjuncts (disjunkty) and Conjuncts
(konjunkty) always non-Argument members
Syntactic classification of Adverbials according to Quirk:
Adjuncts
have grammatical properties resembling the
sentence elements S, C, and O
usually used to modify a verb
carefully, in the
morning
Subjuncs
expresses a condition or hypothesis
amplify or intensify or diminish another sentence
element, and they carry less weight than it does
just, certainly, scarcerly
Disjuncts
comments on the content or manner of what is
being said or written expresses the stance of a
speaker or writer
stand outside the syntactic structure of the text they
are commenting on
frankly, strictly
Conjuncts
indicates the relationship in meaning between
two independent clauses
to conjoin two utterances or parts of an utterance,
and they do so by expressing at the same time the
semantic relationship
therefore, however,
namely
I. Adjuncts
Predication A. Sentence A.
Object-related Subject-related
- Obligatory/Argument
She put the plate on the table. SVOA He is going to school. SVA
- Optional /Non-Argument
Ralph kissed his mother on the cheek. SVO(A) Ralph kissed his mother on the platform. SVO(A)
She found the plate on the table. SVO(A)
- Adjuncts may modify:
o a verb: The temperature fell rapidly. Similarly to the way an adjective may modify a substantive: There was a rapid fall of
temperature.
o an adjective: vaguely familiar face, a roughly estimated figures
o an adverb: It is rather late.
o a clause: This is exactly what she wants
The coding marker of Adjuncts
1 Position:
a) Postverbal position: He stuck a stamp on the envelope. They rented the boat for the summer.
b) Before the expression they modify: He gave a fairly exhaustive account. They received us very politely.
2 No passive transformations
- He moved the chair…….the chair was moved - O
- He moved some yards…some yards were moved* How far? There. Adverbial
- This means an end……..an end is meant by this* What? There* Cs
Structural markers of Adjuncts
- Since adverb phrase is the diagnostic structural realization of Adjuncts it may be used as a test, i.e. reduceability
to/replaceability by a simple adverb
- The car is in the garage….the car is there
- The car is in good repair… The car is there * (=repaired replaceable by an adjective = Cs)
Structural realization of Adjuncts
a) an adverb phrase: He waited patiently. He came late.
b) a noun phrase: They had traveled a very long way. She went home. The river has risen two feet.
c) a prepositional phrase They listen with great interest. Rowena hurried across the field.
He leaned the ladder against the wall. We can´t give you a definite answer for the present.
d) a finite subordinate clause Stay where you are.
e) an infinitive semi-clause They ran in little groups so as not to impede traffic.
f) -ing participle semi-clause He ran up the stairs, taking two at a time.
g) gerundial semi-clause He entered without knocking.
h) verbless clause When in doubt, the answer is “no”.
Cognitive markers circumstantial features
- Corresponding question tests: Where? When? How? Why?
1 Place
a) positional (Where?) Kde? b) directional (Where?) Kam?
He isn´t here. Come here.
He lives abroad. He went abroad.
There is a stain on the carpet. She spilt some tea on the carpet.
c) source : This book cannot be taken from the library.
d)distance: We musn´t go very much further.
2 Time
- position in time elicited by When?: See you on Monday. She was born in 1980.
- duration - elicited by How long?
o of forward span: I shall be there until Sunday.
o of backward span: We have been here since morning.
o limited period: The post office is open from 9. a.m. to 5. p.m.
- frequency elicited by How often? Ho many times?
o He doesn´t often hit the target three times.(He managed to do three times.)
o Nestáva sa často, že zasiahne cieľ trikrát.
o He often doesn´t hit the target three times. (It happens frequently that he fails).
o Často sa stáva, že nezasiahne cieľ trikrát.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download English syntax notes part 2 and more Lecture notes English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

Adverbial modifier Syntactic classification of Adverbials according to Dušková: 1 Adjuncts (príslovkové určenie začlenené do vetnej stavby) - as Argument or non-Argument member 2 Sentence Adverbials (príslovkové určenie nezačlenené do vetnej stavby) divided into Disjuncts (disjunkty) and Conjuncts (konjunkty) – always non-Argument members Syntactic classification of Adverbials according to Quirk: Adjuncts have grammatical properties resembling the sentence elements S, C, and O usually used to modify a verb carefully, in the morning Subjuncs expresses a condition or hypothesis amplify or intensify or diminish another sentence element, and they carry less weight than it does just, certainly, scarcerly Disjuncts comments on the content or manner of what is being said or written expresses the stance of a speaker or writer stand outside the syntactic structure of the text they are commenting on frankly, strictly Conjuncts indicates the relationship in meaning between two independent clauses to conjoin two utterances or parts of an utterance, and they do so by expressing at the same time the semantic relationship therefore, however, namely I. Adjuncts Predication A. Sentence A. Object-related Subject-related

- Obligatory/Argument She put the plate on the table. SVOA He is going to school. SVA - Optional /Non-Argument Ralph kissed his mother on the cheek. SVO(A) Ralph kissed his mother on the platform. SVO(A) She found the plate on the table. SVO(A)

  • Adjuncts may modify: o a verb: The temperature fell rapidly. Similarly to the way an adjective may modify a substantive: There was a rapid fall of temperature. o an adjective: vaguely familiar face, a roughly estimated figures o an adverb: It is rather late. o a clause: This is exactly what she wants The coding marker of Adjuncts 1 Position : a) Postverbal position: He stuck a stamp on the envelope. They rented the boat for the summer. b)Before the expression they modify : He gave a fairly exhaustive account. They received us very politely. 2 No passive transformations
  • He moved the chair…….the chair was moved - O
  • He moved some yards…some yards were moved* How far? There. Adverbial
  • This means an end……..an end is meant by this* What? There* Cs Structural markers of Adjuncts
  • Since adverb phrase is the diagnostic structural realization of Adjuncts it may be used as a test, i.e. reduceability to/replaceability by a simple adverb
  • The car is in the garage….the car is there
  • The car is in good repair… The car is there * (=repaired – replaceable by an adjective = Cs) Structural realization of Adjuncts a) an adverb phrase: He waited patiently. He came late. b) a noun phrase: They had traveled a very long way. She went home. The river has risen two feet. c) a prepositional phrase They listen with great interest. Rowena hurried across the field. He leaned the ladder against the wall. We can´t give you a definite answer for the present. d) a finite subordinate clause Stay where you are. e) an infinitive semi-clause They ran in little groups so as not to impede traffic. f) - ing participle semi-clause He ran up the stairs, taking two at a time. g) gerundial semi-clause He entered without knocking. h) verbless clause When in doubt, the answer is “no”. Cognitive markers – circumstantial features
  • Corresponding question tests: Where? When? How? Why? 1 Place a) positional (Where?) Kde? b) directional (Where?) Kam? He isn´t here. Come here. He lives abroad. He went abroad. There is a stain on the carpet. She spilt some tea on the carpet. c) s ource : This book cannot be taken from the library. d) distance: We musn´t go very much further. 2 Time
  • position in time – elicited by When?: See you on Monday. She was born in 1980.
  • duration - elicited by How long? o of forward span: I shall be there until Sunday. o of backward span: We have been here since morning. o limited period: The post office is open from 9. a.m. to 5. p.m.
  • frequency elicited by How often? Ho many times? o He doesn´t often hit the target three times .(He managed to do three times.) o Nestáva sa často, že zasiahne cieľ trikrát. o He ofte n doesn´t hit the target three times. (It happens frequently that he fails). o Často sa stáva, že nezasiahne cieľ trikrát.
  • relationship between one time and another: She must still be in the office. 3 Manner (príslovkové určenie spôsobu) subclasses: a) manner proper (vlastný spôsob ) – elicited by HOW? Paraphrase – in a ADJECTIVE manner
  • He walked fast. SV (How? In a fast manner.)
  • typically realized by: - ly adverbs: His report was characteristically brief.
  • prep. phrase They received us in a courteous manner = courteously o She listened with attention/difficulty = attentively/ o He left in a hurry. They accepted his offer by word of mouth. He killed two birds at a blow.
  • gerund: I brushed up my English by attending a conversation course. (Osviežil som si …) b) Subject Adjunct (adverbiálne určenie podmetu) foolishly, stupidly, cleverly,... I foolishly lent him some money.
  • Paraphrase: Not: I lent him some money in a foolish manner.***
  • But rather: I was foolish in that I lent him some money. It was foolish of me to lend him some money. (it was – test : interface between subject adjuncts and content disjuncts)
  • Cannot occupy clause-end position: I lent him some money foolishly.*** Hlúpo som mu požičal peniaze. Bolo to odo mňa hlúpe, požičať mu peniaze. Bol som hlúpy, že som mu požičal peniaze. o He cleverly avoided the direct answer. o 1. He avoided the direct answer in a clever manner. He avoided the direct answer cleverly. (Manner Proper) o Vyhol priamej odpovedi chytro. o 2. It was clever of him to avoid the direct answer. He was clever in that he avoided the direct answer. o Bolo od neho chytré, že sa vyhol priamej odpovedi. (Subject Andjuct)
  • BUT! o volition-related adverbs - intentionally, voluntarily, wittingly (vedome), accidentally resemble Subject Adjuncts by expressing the will, willingness of the Subject, but formally admit only it was – ly that paraphrase ( Content Disjuncts ) c) instrument (nástroj) and means (prostriedok) elicited : How? With what? How? By means of what? realized: with plus NP prep. phrase She pricked herself with a pin. I saw it with my own eyes. They were eating with chopsticks. I learnt of it through a newspaper. d) accompanying circumstances of the action
  • She ran out of the house without a coat. She set to work with a sigh. He entered without knocking.
  • Animate accompaniment of the subject He went to the concert with his wife. She gave testimony before a judge. e) viewpoint adjunct – adjunkt zreteľa
  • For a beginner she is doing quite well.
  • Considering the fact that she is a beginner, she is doing quite well.
  • It´s rather cold for June. – Considering the fact that it is June, it´s rather cold.
  • She is good at languages. – From the point of view of languages, she is good. f) result The rain changed into snow. The examples fall into four groups. They made a shed into a garage. 4 Contingency Adjuncts (príslovkové určenie príčinnosti) a) reason/príčina Why? For what reason? His voice trembled with anger. He couldn´t sleep for pain. b) purpose/účel For what purpose (not for what reason?) He came on business. Will you stay for lunch? c) effect/účinok This may lead to trouble. She was so excited as to be unable to sleep. d) condition/podmienka In case of fire/In the event of fire, ring the alarm bell. With your permission, I will explain. e) concession/prípustka ( cause-effect relationship does not apply ) In spite of all his efforts, he failed to attain his goal. f) source/pôvod, zdroj He made a hut out of old planks. g) origin/agency - pôvodca This play written by Shakespeare. 5 Measure Adjuncts (príslovkové určenie miery) a) measure adjunct proper The cup is full to the grim. The ditch is two yards deep. b) intensifiers i. adjective and adverbial ii. verbal a very expensive instrument I nearly missed the train. a fairly common case I quite understand. Is it warm enough? We thoroughly disapprove of it.
  • adjective intensifiers used only with certain adj. I am dead sure/certain/drunk. – postposition: I was wide awake/The door was wide open. We didn´t like it much. brand new, pitch dark, st o ne deaf He earns a lot. participles: burning hot, dazzling bright comparative constructions: sharp as a razor , as strong as a horse definitely, certainly, really, indeed – pure intensifiers, cannot be elicited by to what extent question test 6 Focusing Adjuncts (vytýkacie príslovky) (among SUBJUNCTS in Quirk)
  • only, especially, as well, also, even, just, merely, solely, alone, simply, especially
  • Rhematising effect activated in relation to the VP, AdjP, AP, NP, clause 1 Even a child can understand. 2 This is just what I want. 3 He has only been fined. 4 His leg has been only bruised, not broken.
  • position in a complex verb form before the main verb – it relates only to the action (4), otherwise to the whole sentence (3) Argument Employment Of Adjuncts 1 Spatial qualifying frame: SVA
  • He went to school. (Qualified Entity + Directional Qualifier)-
  • The flight takes two hours. (Qualified Entity + Temporal Qualifier)
  • After a negative particle the Adverbial belongs to the verb - verb intensifier:
  • Really I don´t know. I really don´t know. (CD) I don´t really know. (intensifier) Transition of syntactic categories Subject Adjuncts versus Content Disjuncts
  • Subject Adjunct : She foolishly lent him some money. two possible paraphrases: It was foolish of her to lend him some money. She was foolish in that she lent him some money.
  • Content Disjunct She voluntarily lent him some money. only one paraphrase: It was voluntary that she lent him some money. Not: She was voluntary in that she lent him some money.
  • Cf. The whole manuscript should be retyped properly.
  • How? Manner Adjunct (the final position allows of only the manner proper interpretation)
  • Properly, the whole manuscript should be retyped.
  • It is proper that the whole manuscript should be retyped. Conjuncts
  • sub-classes: a) listing: in the first place, next, then b) additive: above all, moreover, in addition, furthermore, similarly c) summative: altogether, all in all, overall d) appositive: i.e., namely, e.g. e) resultive: so, therefore, as a result: I woke up late, as a result I missed the train. Semantic subclasses of Adjuncts
  • Place (position, direction, source, distance)
  • Time (position, duration, frequence, relation)
  • Manner (proper, subject adjuncts, instrument/means, accomp. circumst. /accompaniment, viewpoint, result)
  • Contingency (reason, purpose,effect,condition, concession, source, agency)
  • Measure (proper, intensifiers)
  • Focusing Disjuncts
  • Style Content Franky speaking It is ADJ that To be frank .... Which is ADJ
  • factiveness of content
  • attitude to the content Complement
  • The typical role of a subject complement and an object complement is that of Attribute. a) Identification : Kevin is my brother. They named their daughter Edna. b) Characterization : Martha was a good student. Daniel remains helpful. c) Current Attribute: He is my brother. He seems unhappy. d) Resulting Attribute: We became restless. They elected him president.
  • If the verb is be , identification attributes allow reversal of subject and complement: o Kevin is my brother. My brother is Kevin.
  • Only characterization attributes can also be realized by adjective phrases. SVCs
  • Robert is becoming quite mature.
  • the subject complement characterizes the subject Robert SVOCo
  • Doris considers Robert quite mature.
  • the object complement characterizes the direct object Robert Coding markers
  • is placed after the Object
  • cannot become the focus of passive transformation: She considered her mother a sensible woman
  • A sensible woman was considered her mother by her.*** only Her mother was considered (to be) a sensible woman (by her).
  • can be considered as a reduced secondary predication between the Object and the Object Complement: her mother is a sensible woman
  • it is valency inomissible Structural markers
  • noun phrase: They appointed him a company director.
  • adjective phrase: He shouted himself hoarse.
  • prepositional phrase: I wouldn´t describe him as really clever.
  • infinitive semi-clause: We presume him to be innocent. Cognitive markers
  • The diagnostic cognitive role: Qualifier (of Object).
  • Current Qualifier: She likes her coffee black.
  • Resultant Qualifier: He kicked the door open. Facultative complements of Subject and Object
  • SVCs versus SV(Cs) Peter is disappointed Peter returned disappointed. Peter seems disappointed. He came home tired.
  • SVOCo SVO(Co) 1.They found the defendant guilty. 3.They found the box empty. 2.They forced the door open. 4.They brought him home drunk.

The omissibility test and two-predications tests would apply in sentences 3 and 4: They found the defendant.* They found the box. The defendant was guilty It was empty when they found it. when they found him.* Terminology used by Dušková and Quirk (Janigová) Peter is disappointed. Peter came disappointed. They found Peter disappointed. Považovali ho za sklamaného. They brought him home drunk. Dušková menná časť slovesno- menného prísudku doplnok podmetu obligatórny doplnok predmetu doplnok predmetu Quirk Subject complement Subject-qualifying verbless clause Object complement Object-qualifying verbless clause Janigová Obligatory subject complement Facultative subject complement Obligatory Object Complement Facultative Object Complement Apposition (Prístavok)

  • a relationship between 2 equivalent elements occupying 1 slot
  • My friend John likes Maria. (Subject slot)
  • Maria likes my friend John. (Object slot)
  • This is my friend John. (Subject Complement slot)
  • can also be expressed by that-c1auses, by non finite clauses, and by prepositional phrases. Head+Head relationship
  • My friend John likes Maria.
  • Subject Apposition ???
  • Apposition Subject ???
  • HEAD HEAD in an appositive position/relationship Coding markers 1 Reduceability to any of the members in a particular syntactic slot My friend likes Maria. John/my friend likes Maria 2 Replaceability by a single pronominal form: He likes Maria. 3 Identical functional syntactic interpretation (one and the same clause element): My friend /Maria ….. Subject 4 Mutual sub-categorization projected unto bidirectional transformations (via relative clauses, can be considered as reduction of relatives by omitting a copula. Two transforms are available contrary to modifiers: Hotel Hilton… Hilton which is a hotel/Hotel which is called Hilton. hotel staff ….staff pertaining to the hotel, staff of a hotel Structural markers
  • NP + NP: Hotel Hilton is situated on the corner of the Fifth Avenue.
  • NP+and+NP: His brother and subsequent editor of his collected papers was with him of his at his deathbed. (Q217)
  • NP+or+NP: Linguistics or the study of language attracts many students.
  • NP+ of PP : giant of a man (the three of us)
  • NP+personal pronoun: we girls helped John.
  • NP+reflexive pronoun: Jane herself signed the bill.
  • NP +numeral: you three NP +quantifiers: all, both, each: the girls all/both/each have helped John.
  • NP+infinitive semi-clause the way how to do it, NP+gerundial semi-clause: the way of doing it
  • NP + that subordinate clause: the fact that it was lost (skutočnosť, že ….)
  • NP + conjunct+NP: S hakespeare´s tragedies, i.e. Othelo, Macbeth, Hamlet
  • NP + style disjunct+NP: The two of the words are homonyms, or more precisely homophones. Cognitive markers
  • The identical referent test/the same onomasiologically prominent entity:
  • Hotel Hilton….. Hotel a general name Hilton proper name of one and the same building or facility
  • Hemingway, the great American writer, …. Hemingway a proper name The greatest American writer How to distinguish an appositive relationship from head-postmodifying relationship:
  • Lake Superior is located in the USA.
  • Lake District is located in Britain.
  • Head+Head o Lake Superior is located in the USA. 1 Syntactic reduceabilty to any of them 2 Replaceability by a simple pronoun: Lake/Superior/It is located... 3 Bidirectional transforms: Superior which is a lake. Lake which is called Superior. 4 Identical referent: lake for both, one referent
  • Premodifier+Head o Lake District is situated in England. 1 Syntactic reduceabilty to any of them: Lake/District is situated in England 2 Replaceability by a simple pronoun: District/It is situated in England. 3 Unidirectional transforms: District which is called Lake. District which is a lake 4 Identical referent: lake/region – two referents of which one is onomasiologically prominent in relation to the gien syntactic position Pragmatic implications of apposition and subtypes: 1 Sub-types of Restrictive Apposition (tesný prístavok): a)1.general noun + proper noun: Lake Superior is located in the USA. the River Danube the common children´s disease measles the drug aspirin Doctor James b)of-phrase with geographical names general noun + proper noun the month of August cf. the President of the Republic

Compound sentence

  • Jane was writing her homework/ and / John was reading a book.
  • both clauses are syntactically independent (they are capable of realizing independent setences)
  • syntactic equivalence/parataxis/coordination
  • both are MAIN CLAUSES
  • coordinative conjunctions – typically cannot be preceded by another conjunction, fixed position of a clause introduced by them
  • coordination – two or more members may enter it
  • each of the clauses has its own valency frame/chain independent of each other
  • Subtypes of compound sentence o Copulative : She likey him and he likes her. o Adversative : I have worked with him for ten years but I don´t know much about him. o Disjunctive : Is it a joke or are you serious? o Reason : It was by no means an easy ascent, for the wall was high, and it was surmounted by broken glass. o Consequence / Result : Her health is rather delicate, she can´t therefore engage in strenuous undertakings. o Conditional : Give a dog a bad name, and he´ll live up to it. o the last three show a mixture of compound/complex features: surface syntactic independence, deep-level semantic dependence (so called false parataxis) Complex sentence
  • 1 clause is syntactically dependent on the other
  • the relation of dependence/subordinations/hypotaxis
  • one clause is Superordinate clause (hlavná veta) and one is Subordinate clause (vedľajšia veta)
  • subordination – only two members may enter it, there is only one external valency chain of a complex sentence – that of the superordinate clause (BUT! Every subordinate clause has its own valency!)
  • the subordinate clause functions as one of the clause elements of the superordinate clause
  • if a subordinate clause fills in the slot in the superordinate clause that is mandatory in respect of its valency, the superordinate clause is termed Matrix clause Syntactic functions of subordinate clauses
  • may function as subject, object, complement, or adverbial in a superordinate clause: o Subject: That we need a larger computer has become obvious. o Direct object: He doesn't know whether to send a gift. o Indirect object You can tell whoever is waiting that I'll be back in ten minutes. o Subject complement: One likely result of the postponement is that the cost of constructing the college will be very much higher. o Object complement: I know her to be reliable. o Adverbial: When you see them, give them my best wishes. o Adjunct of reason /He didn´t like the film because it was too long /. o Sentential relative clause/Content Disjunct: /She didn´t like it, which I found strange ./
  • may function within these elements , eg: o Postmodifier in noun phrase: (Few of the immigrants retained) the customs that 'hey had brought with them. o Prepositional complement: (It depends) on what we decide. o Adjectival complementation: (We are) happy to see you. Functional classes of subordinate clauses 1 Nominal clauses - obsahové vedľajšie vety - may function as subject, object, complement. appositive, and Pcomplement. 2 Adverbial clauses - adverbiálne vedľajšie vety - function mainly as adjuncts or disjuncts 3 Relative clauses - vzťažné vedľajšie vety - function as restrictive or non restrictive modifiers of noun phrases and are therefore functionally parallel to attributive adjectives. 4 Comparative clauses - resemble adjectives and adverbs in their modifying functions: Nominal (Content) Clauses
  • Declarative sentence I like it. >>> He says that he likes it.
  • Wh-question: What do you like? >>> He asks what I like.
  • Subtypes : 1 Declarative nominal dependent (that) clauses
  • Subject: It annoys me t hat he is so slow. – postponed It´s strange (t hat ) she didn´t like it. - asyndetic
  • Object : I think (that) I have met him. They have convinced her that she will win. I am sure I put it there.
  • Extraposed with anticipatory it: (owe, rely on, take for, find)
  • I owe it to you that I am still alive.
  • You may rely on it that he will come.
  • Subject Complement The most important thing is that we shall be able to go together.
  • Postmodifier : The idea that nobody will survive is apalling. 2 Interrogative dependent clauses a) Yes/No dependent interrogative clauses
  • Subject : Whether we should go is a problem to be settled. Whoever gives the approval does not assume any liability in doing so. (private legal instrument)
  • Object : I am not sure/I doubt whether we should stay.
  • Subject Complement : The main question is whether we should stay.
  • Postmodifier : I express my doubt whetherI should stay. b)Wh-dependent interrogative clause (doplňovacie otázky)
  • Subject : What the result will be cannot be predicted.
  • Object : I should like to know whose idea it was.
  • Subject Complement: The question is how much it will cost.
  • Postmodifier : He gave no explanation of how it could have happened. c) Alternative interrogative clauses (alternatívne)
  • Object: I don´t care whether/if my conduct is approved of or criticized. 3 Imperative dependent clauses: I suggest that we should go. 4 Wish dependent clauses: He wished she would stop talking. 5 Exclamative clauses: Everybody was saying how well she looked.
  • Exclamatives versus Interrogatives 1) I know what he is hiding up his sleeve. 2)I know what a skillful conjurer he is.
  • both introduced by How /What 1 I want to know the answer to the question What is he hiding up his sleeve? 2 How/What – intensifier/evaluator, no missing information indicated by the introductory verb What a skillful conjurer he is! Relative Clauses
  • Introduced by relative items (pronouns, adverbs, particles)
  • 2 sub-types depending on whether they perform the function of syntactic noun or adjective 1 Substantival (nominal) relative clauses
  • function of S, O, Cs, Postmod.
  • the underlying paraphrase: „ that which....“
  • Subject: What interests my son usually bores my daughter.
  • Object: What the eye does not see, the heart won´t grieve over.
  • Subject Complement: That´s what I feared.
  • Postmodifier: The following description of what is happening may be helpful. 2 Adjectival relative clauses
  • function of Postmod. of the head of NP
  • two pragmatic sub-types
  • Restrictive Non-restrictive pragmatically
  • indispensable dispensable for identification of referent of the head of the NP
  • not separated with a comma separated with a comma
  • I have two friends who write to me regularly. I have two friends, who write to me regularly.
  • (I have many friends) (I only have these two friends) 3 Sentential Relative Clause
  • postmodifying the whole of the preceding clause, qualifying the content of the preceding clause – functioning as content disjunct, following a clausal antecedent
  • He admires Mrs. Brown, which I find strange. Comparison of Content Interrogative clauses versus Nominal Relative clauses introduced by who, if, what, when, where, how,…. function of S, O, Cs, Postmod. Onomasiologically prominent is the whole proposition/missing info facts, events, ideas expressed as one concept) onomasiological difference Onomasiologically prominent is the nominal entity that is specified implicit head being postmodified “the answer to the question“X“ (Huddleston) I know where he is.>>> I know the answer to the question “Where is he?” paraphrasable by “that which” “That which interests my son...“ What the result will be cannot be predicted. S What interests my son usually bores my daughter. He doesn´t know when he is well off. O He had done only what was natural. The question is whether we should go or stay. Cs That´s what I feared. The idea that nobody will survive is appalling. Postmodifier The following rough description of what is happening may be helpful. Adverbial Clauses (subclassified according to semantic classes of adjuncts) 1 Place: Where the fire had been, we saw nothing but blackened ruins. 2 Time: Wait until you are called. 3 Reason: He is thin because you´re my friend****. 4 Contingency: If you put the baby down, she will scream. 5 Purpose : The school closes earlier so that the children can get home before dark. etc. Semi-clauses/Non-finite clauses
  • Dušková – semi-clause constructions/semi-clauses (polovetné väzby/konštrukcie): o Infinitive / Gerund/-Ing-Participle
  • Quirk – non-finite (subordinate) clauses: (nefinitívne vedľajšie vety) o Infinitive / - Ing Participle Common features
  • comprise secondary predication

Melting point = point of melting Negotiating purposes = purposes of negotiating There is no proper basis for distinguishing between the facts of this case from Mecca Leisure. b) Participial mod. are paraphrasable by relative clauses Melting snow = snow which is melting A notice proposing a new annual rent Subject

  • To play with him was a great fun. G
  • It was great fun to play with him. G
  • Seeing is believing. G Subject Complement
  • His remarks seem to irritate him. G Seeing is believing. G Object
  • He refused to cooperate. G I would hate you to regret it. G I like reading books. G I dislike John singing. G Adjuncts
  • Purpose He stopped there to have a coffee. For the purpose of deciding this appeal, it does not matter....G
  • Time I spoke to him before calling the police. G Once having made a promise, you should keep it. P I awoke one morning to find the house in an uproar. (time+outcome)
  • Reason I shudder to think about it. I demand that, it having been destroyed, I am granted a new tenancy. P
  • Goal He has gone to see his sister. Style disjuncts
  • To be sincere, I didn´t like it.
  • Putting it shortly, I will not come. P Functional Sentence Perspective A. Na stole je kniha. vs B. Kniha je na stole.
  • What is the difference between A and B sentences? o Surface analysis of clause (phrase structure analysis) – clause elements – S, V, O, A, ... o Types of structures (phrases, clauses, semiclauses) o Cognitive analysis (onomasiological roles, semantic roles, Arguments) – Doer, Qualifier, Focus.... o Functional Sentence Perspective – FSP analysis (theme, rheme, transition)
  • Which of the following translations of sentence A Na stole je kniha. Into ENG do you consider adequate and why? 1 On the table is the book. 2 The book is on the table. 3 There is a book on the table.
  • Kniha je na stole.
  • The book is on the table. What is the difference between an FSP analysis of a sentence and other types of sentence analyses? 1 Structural – determination of lexical-morphological type of structure occupying linear slots (via transposition and permutation tests – aims to identify syntactic phrases - syntactic phrases: Noun Phrase, Verb Phrase, Adjective Phrase, Adverb Phrase, Prepositional Phrase , or in non-simple sentences – types of finite dependent clauses or semiclauses 2 Cognitive/onomasiological/deep-level analysis – identification of central and peripheral cognitive roles (Arguments and non- Arguments) and their chains– Agent, Experiencer, Action, Qualifier, Circumstance (notion of cognitive valency, question tests) 3 Grammatical/surface/functional analysis – identification of clause elements/syntactic functions S, V, O, A, Mod. and syntactic frames (kernel sentence types) (Chomsky´s Phrase Structure Analysis)
  • 1,2,3 mutually interact - the correct delimitation of phrases allows of correct assignment of syntactic functions/clause elements and both are derived from the identification of cognitive roles (a simple question test is critical)
  1. A V S O V kráľovstve za siedmimi horami/ mal /jeden starý kráľ / troch synov.
  2. PrepP VP NP NP
  3. Location / Action / Qualified Entity / Qualifier
  4. Scene /Vlastnosť/ Jav=Nositeľ vl./ Špecifikácia Scale AB Theme Transition Theme Rheme What is the purpose of FSP?
  • Word without its sentence context only has its lexical meaning - it is the user that assigns its the sense by employing it in a sentence by which the user responds to some extra-linguistic reality
  • (sense goes beyond purely linguistic concepts and emerges as an extra-linguistic factor, a result of interaction between the contextual meaning of the word in discourse and cognitive factors, such one´s knowledge of the world and acquaintance with the communicative situation Černov, 2004: 43).
  • (Topicalization (FSP) converts the non-linear, non-discrete mental representation of a fragment of the world discussed in the discourse into an ordered linear sequence of discrete components, by means of an ordered set of linguistic units.) (Černiakovskaja, 1983 in Černov, 2014:43) Vilém Mathesius
  • Vilém Mathesius – Aktuální Členění Věty (aktuálne vetné členenie) AČV (later elaborated by Petr Sgall group)
  • V.M. „aktuální členění věty je způsob, jakým je /věta/ začleněna do věcné souvislosti, z níž vznikla. ... základními prvky aktuálního členění věty jsou východiště výpovědi , to jest to, co je v dané situaci známo nebo alespoň na snadě a od čeho mluvčí vychází, a jádro výpovědi , to jest to, co mluvčí o východišti výpovědi nebo se zřetelem k němu vypovídá.“(Mathesius, 1939: 171-
  • = aktuálne vetné členenie, teda členenie vety ako výpovede v aktuálnom okamihu prehovoru (s. 1 Svoboda)
  • Východiště A Jádro Mathesius and Word Order
  • The only means of FSP according to Mathesius is Word Order
  • Objective word order SVO (direction from the known to the inknown information – from what we talk about to what we say about it (Černov) – it is the word order in which the initial part of the sentence is perceived as the communication starting point/basis (východište/theme) whereas its end segments represent the core/new/nucleus – the rheme/jádro – this rule of direction of communication is more or less universal
  • This word order corresponds with the general formal division of a sentence into Subject (about which something is to be said) and Predicate (prísudok) indicating what is said about the Subject
  • However, where it is necessary to rhematize the Subject, other surface means must be employed: subjective WO, there is/there are, clefts and pseudoclefts, focusing adjuncts, special deicticals, etc. Subjective word order – placing Rheme in the initial position
  • Subjective word order may be accomplished in two ways: 1 1.by interfering with the SVO linearity – in CZ or SLK – subjective word order , i.e. method of putting the Subject to the final position: Janko miluje Marienku. – Marienku miluje Janko. 2 2. by interfering with Theme-Rheme sequence (in Mahesius´ terms) – A dog barked in the distance. (the issue of non-thematic subjects)
  • OVS word order is grammatically inadmissible in ENG: John loves Mary. - Mary Loves John. o both sentences will be cognitively/onomasiologically perceived as showing the frame Experiencer – Affection – Focus, i.e. the Subject position would be perceived as Experiencer and it will be thematic
  • The feature of the word order – the ability/function to activate the reading of Arguments and clause elements is called Grammaticalisation Of Word Order (typologically, it is on the level of inflectional affixes as so called flagging and indexing devices (Haspelmath,.....)
  • This led Mathesius to the conclusion that: „angličtina je méně citlivá k AČ než čeština, protože při slovosledném uspořádaní věty dává přednost principiu gramatickému před principem AČ.“ (Mathesius, 1942)
  • The existence of so called non-thematic Subjects motivated Mathesius in concluding that “ModE is insusceptible to the requirements of FSP“ (Mathesius in Dušková 2015: 164) Vilém Mathesius – the function of the passive
  • The funtion of the PASSIVE to compromise the grammaticalization of SVO and Theme-Rheme sequence
  • „...the grammatical word order fails to comply with the principle of functional sentence perspective... English resolves this conflict by resorting to the passive
  • “Ve škole horlivě naslouchal každému slovu svých učitelů, doma mu pomáhal otec.
  • At school he eagerly listened to every word of his teachers. At home he was helped by his father. (Mathesius in Dušková 2015:
  • Research into non-thematic Subjects was developed further by Jan Firbas who refused Mathesius´insusceptibility of ModE word order to FSP and found that 1 linearity (Word Order, WO) is not the only FSP factor 2 the passive may have two FSp functions – thematising and rhematising Jan Firbas
  • Brno Linguistic School
  • He introduced the term Funkčná Vetná Perspektíva (Functional Sentence Perspective – coined by Jozef Vachek when translating the Mathesius term “aktuální větní členění“ (faux amis problém actual vs. aktuálny in CZ/SK, hwe preferred a concept-motivated translation)
  • Communicatively, every utterance consists of several components of which each contributes to the development of communication
  • „sdělná závažnost složek je charakterizována výpovědní dynamičnosti – Communicative significance of respective components is characterised by so called communicative dynamism whose relative degrees are distributed among the bearers of communicative dynamism (CD) of CD distributional field as a result of an interplay of the FSP factors and tend to be arranged toward the communicatively most prominent component Theme – Transit – Rheme
  • based on the FSP factors´ interplay, each bearer of CD is assigned a certain degree of CD (výpovednej dynamičnosti – communicative dynamism)
  • Bearer of the lowest degree of CD – Theme (Mathesius - východište)
  • Bearer of the highestdegree of CD – Rheme (Mathesius - jadro)
  • Transitional elements – Transit (Mathesius - tranzit) FSP Factors A. NON-PROSODIC FACTORS: 1.Linearity (Word Order - WO) 2. Semantics 3. Context B. PROSODIC FACTOR 4. Intonation (in oral discourse) (Svoboda, s. 2) / Prosody FSP factors – WO, semantics, context, prosody
    • FSP factors (WO, semantics, context and intonation) influence CD and exist in all known natural languages, however, the rules of their interplay are ´language-specific´
  • linearity (word order) – components are arranged one after another (plus specific syntactic structures - there is/there are, clefts and pseudoclefts, focusing adjuncts, special deicticals...
  • semantics – components carry specific dynamic semantic roles
  • context – components occur in specific contexts (textual, deictic (external situational) and experiential)
  • prosody – applicable in oral utterances
  • FSP factors do not operate separately but rather in mutual interactions
  • Firbas nazval vyššie spomínané sémantické funkcie Dynamickými (menia sa v závislosti od faktorov FSP), aby ich odlíšil od Statických sémantických rolí/kognitívnych rolí (Agens, Paciens, Dej, Cieľ deja atď.), ktoré sú podmienené fungovaním určitého valenčného slovesného vzorca
  • Agent Action Recipient Theme:
  • John gave him a book. A book - Réma
  • John gave the book to him. To him - Réma
  • He gave it to him. To him - Réma Context As FSP Factor
  • Utterance expressed in relation to other utterances in a concrete situation and under certain knowledge conditions of language users
  • Components that are known or easily derivable from the preceding context, situation of experience of langauge users are labelled as Context Bound (kontextovo zapojené (viazané))
  • New component that cannot be derived from teh context are terms Context Unbound (kontextovo nezapojené (neviazané)) 3 kinds of context boundness 1 immediately relevant verbal ( slovný) context V jednej krajine panoval starý kráľ a ten mal troch synov.
  1. Immediately relevant situational context Napísal som ti tu všetky možnosti.
  2. Immediately relevant experiential c ontext Do debaty sa zapojil aj prezident. Václav Havel povedal, že... Kontextovo zapojené zložky majú tendenciu fungovať ako tematické jednotky, pokiaľ súhrou ostatných 3 faktorov FSP nedôjde k ich rematizácii: To rozbil ON (koniec vety, sémantika-špecifikácia, intonačné centrum vety) Ne/Tématická sféra vety (non-/thematic sphere or layer)
  • Súbor všetkých tématických alebo rématických jednotiek vo vete
  • Pavol to s ňou bude musieť zajtra nacvičiť z videozáznamu za necelé dve hodiny.
  • Tématická sféra - Tématické zložky: Pavel, to, s ňou, zajtra
  • Netématická sféra - Rématické zložky: z videozáznamu, za necelé dve hodiny
  • Tranzit: bude musieť nacvičiť Tématizácia v FSP
  • Tematizovať nositeľa CD v distribučnom poli CD znamená spôsobiť, že je hovoriacim/spisovateľom prezentovaný a poslucháčom/čitateľom identifikovaný ako tematická jednotka
  • Téma – nesie relatívne nižšie stupne CD a je signalizovaná súhrou faktorov FSP
  • Tematizujúce prostriedky:
  • z hľadiska linearity: začiatok vety
  • z hľadiska sémantiky: dynamická sémantická funkcia Scény (kulisy) a Nositeľa vlastnosti
  • z hľadiska kontextu: používanie zámen namiesto plných mien, slabých ukazovacích zámen, určitých členov ako odkaz na známu vec
  • z hľadiska intonácie: nízky stupeň prozodickej prominencie Jej som to včera zabudol dať (38)
  • Jej – tematizované pozíciou vs. Včera som to zabudol dať jej (réma).
  • Včera – tematizované sémantickou funkciou SCÉNY vs.
  • Jej som to zabudol dať včera (réma) – ŠPECIFIKÁCIA
  • To – tematizované použitím kontextovo zapojeného slabého zámena vs. Včera som jej TOTO zabudol dať. (TOTO je dekontextualizované, rematizované)
  • Som – tematizované použitím výlučnej signalizácie podmetu tvarom (sufixom) pomocného slovesa vs dekontextualizované zámeno JA: Jej som to včera zabudol dať JA. Rematizácia v FSP
  • Rematizovať niektorého nositeľa CD znamená spôsobiť, že je hovoriacim/pisateľom prezentovaný a poslucháčom/čitateľom identifikovaný ako rematická jednotka (nesie relatívne vyšší stupeň CD, ktorý je výsledkom súhry faktorov FSP)
  • Z hľadiska linearity – koncové postavenie Včera som to zabudol dať jej. Mária pomohla Jánovi. Jánovi pomohla Mária. ENG: Mary helped John. Johne was helped by Mary.
  • Cleft sentences: Mary helped John. It was Mary who helped John.
  • Pseudo-clefts: Who helped John was Mary. What John gave to Mary was a book. What you need is a good sleep. Foregrounding: Ten thousands saw I at a glance.
  • Z hľadiska dynamickej sémantiky – JAV (škály A alebo ŠPECIFIKÁCIA (škály B) Zabudol som na to. (zabud-o-l nocionálna zložka je VLASTNOSŤ, pri absencii ŠPECIFIKÁCIE)
  • Z hľadiska kontextu – použitie dekontextualizačného prostriedku – plný tvar ukazovacieho zámena, vytýkacie príslovky(focusing adjunts): dokonca aj, ešte aj,...Dokonca i on prišiel. (on – réma, dokonca i - rematizátor)
  • Z hľadiska intonácie – použitie vysokého stupňa prozodickej prominencie intonačného centra : Poslali mu zadarmo celé tri ročníky.
  • zadarmo – réma, rematizátor je intonácia Firbas versus Mathesius Non-thematic Subjects - príklad
  • Čo Mathesiovi nesedelo v tendencii, kde Téma predchádza v komunikačnom prúde Réme bol výskyt v angličtine tzv. „non- thematic subjects“ – teda réma v podmetovej funkcii:
  • výskum Non-Thematic Subjects ďalej rozvíjal Firbas, ktorý odmietol Mathesiovu tézu o necitlivosti anglického slovosledu k FSP dospel k tomu, že:
  1. linearita nie je jediný faktor FSP (+ kontext a sémantická štruktúra- škály) a
  2. Existujú 2 funkcie pasívu z hľadiska FSP: tematizujúca a rematizujúca

Funkcia pasívu

  1. Povrchovo: gramaticky pasív znamená zmenu SVO na S(activeO)/V /by-phrase (active S) They built this house in 1984. - This house was built in 1984 by them. Tento dom postavili v 1984. Tento dom bol postavený v 1984. (réma je rovnaká)
  2. Kognitívne roly sa nemenia – Agent-Action-Resultant-Circumstance
  3. FSP - Komunikačne sa využíva na potlačenie agensovej perspektívy vety – vlastnej témy Téma – they, diatéma this house, réma in 1984. Pasív v FSP by-agent passive vs agentless passive
  • Mathesius analysed the most frequent FSP structure of the passive with an expressed by-agent (the Subject Agent in the active counterpart of the sentence)
  • Gramaticky pasív znamená zmenu SVO na S(activeO)V by-phrase (active S)
  • They built this house in 1984. - This house was built in 1984 by them.
  • Tento dom postavili v 1984. Tento dom bol postavený v 1984. (réma je rovnaká)
  • Komunikačne sa využíva na potlačenie agensovej perspektívy vety.
  • Téma – they, diatéma this house , réma in 1984. Non-thematic subjects (Firbas in Dušková 2014:164) a)Passive rhematising Subject
  • Non-thematic subjects are indicated by context independence and semantic structure expressing existence or appearance on the scene (prezentačná škála realizovaná pasívom s vyjadreným tematickým by-agensom a rematickým subjektom) o In the six years 1956-61, a total of 81,079 applications for disablement benefit were made by coal miners.
  • Rhematic Subject (actually the only context idenpendent item is the quantifier of the Subject) +Thematic by-agent contrary to the basic distribution of CD in the passive o In the six years 1956-61, there was a total of 81,079 applications for disablement benefit made by coal miners.
  • In the active: Rhematic Subject proper is placed final which is in accordance with the basic distribution of CD b)Passive rhematising by-agent by contrast
  • Mathesius skúmal BY-AGENT ako rému :
  • Na to, aby BY-AGENT zafungoval ako réma – potrebuje KONTRAST:
  • Ve škole horlivě naslouchal každému slovu svých učitelů , doma mu pomáhal otec.
  • At school he eagerly listened to every word of his teachers. At home he was helped by his father. (Math. in Dušková s. 165) c) Agentless passive (Dušková about Firbas´findings as to non-thematic subjects)
  • Bezagensový pasív (agentless passive) – SVO, kde agens je všeobecnej povahy alebo je irrelevantný v danom kontexte
  • ide o prezentačnú sémantickú škálu, kde je jav rémou :
  • Sometimes a terrible cry was to be heard. (Fb in D2015:164) SK: Niekedy bolo počuť hrozný krik.
  • Powerful machines have been constructed. (Fb in D2015:164) SK: Boli skonštruované nové stroje.
  • A new method has been developed. (Fb in D2015:164) SK: Bola vynájdená nová metóda.
  • One more specific point should be made in this context. (Dušk. 167)
  • V tomto kontexte je potrebné poukázať ešte na jeden moment. d)Passive rhematizing action Diatheme Rheme Theme proper The sight of this harmless vanity depressed him. (oba argumenty deja sú kontextovo zapojené) Theme proper Rheme Diatheme He was depressed by the sight of this harmless vanity. (Dušk. 165)
  • Zmena slovesného rodu tu nemá vplyv na rému – chýba tu kontrast a zámenné formy indikujú, že existuje antecent (či už v texte (referenčný) alebo mimo textu(deiktický)) – teda oba argumenty slovesa sa kontextovo zapojené, a tým je sloveso uvoľnené na rematizáciu (Dušk.166) Versus Pasív rematizujúci By-phrase Rheme Theme Varying degrees of bilingualism characterise/are characteristic of such situations. (len jeden argument je kontextovo zapojený) Theme Rheme Such situations are characterized by varying degrees of bilingualism. (Dušk. 165 ) Theme Rheme Pre tieto situácie sú charakteristické rôzne stupne bilingvalizmu. (JG) Odvolací súd zrušil odsúdenie – Odsúdenie bolo zrušené. The appellate court quashed the conviction. The conviction was quashed. Téma Réma Diatéma Odvolací súd zrušil odsúdenie. (dejová réma kvôli tomu, že oba argumenty sú kontextovo zapojené) Diatéma Réma Odsúdenie bolo zrušené. Textový faktor pri voľbe pozície diatémy a témy a) („Are you all right, Blackie? I mean, do you want someone to go home with you ?“) The thought appalled Blackie. (Dušk 166) Diatéma- réma- Téma b) Blackie was appalled by the thought. Téma-réma-diatéma
  • In a. Subjekt „the thought“ rezumuje rému z bezprostredne predchádzajúcej vety (do you want someone to go home with you?).
  • Objekt odkazuje na prvok, ktorý je v texte viac doľava (je teda vzdialenejší). Obe menné frázy sú kontextovo závislé sú rovnako realizované – bez modifikácie a ide o určité (definite) konštrukcie. Predstavujú zrkadlový obraz svojich antecedentov, kvôli väčšej textovej súdržnosti – v porovnaní s pasívom b.