

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The push-pull strategy is an organic alternative to genetically modified maize, developed in eastern africa to improve food security, enhance biodiversity, and provide alternative income sources for smallholder farmers. It uses a combination of legume repellent plants and trap crops to deter pests and attract them away from the main crop, while also suppressing and eliminating the striga weed through nitrogen fixation and allelopathy. The strategy has been adopted by over 10,000 households in kenya and uganda and has been disseminated through various means including farmer field schools and mass media.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


and improvement in the sustainable use of natural resources. The strategy provides several benefits, directly or indirectly contributing to the livelihoods of rural families. Such opportunities include:
Improving food security Push-Pull has increased maize yields of farmers in Kenya by an average of 20 - 30 percent in areas with only stemborers (Trans Nzoia district), and by more than 100 percent in areas with both stemborers and Striga (e.g. Vihiga, Siaya, Suba and Migori districts). This has been a key incentive for its increased adoption.
Reduced soil erosion and increased soil fertility By providing a good ground cover, the strategy improves soil conservation. Through nitrogen fixation, the strategy reduces the required amount of nitrogen fertilizers, which are unaffordable by most smallholder farmers. A long-term study at ICIPE’s on-station fields in Mbita, western Kenya, has shown a significant increase in total nitrogen on field plots under maize- Desmodium intercropping for three years, especially when compared to maize fields intercropped with other legumes.
Enhanced biodiversity The Push-Pull strategy promotes and conserves biodiversity by maintaining species diversity. This, in turn, improves natural and agricultural ecosystems by contributing to ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and decomposition. This helps in developing sustainable crop protection systems which rely less on pesticides. A study conducted in Lambwe Valley (Suba district, Kenya) shows that the strategy is associated with an overall enhancement of beneficial predators, which is important in agricultural systems.
Livestock production and human health Unstable availability and seasonality of livestock feed have been major constraints to improving dairy livestock in Eastern Africa. Push-Pull provides quality fodder for livestock. On small farms where land pressure is high, this is likely to improve the health of farming families, especially children. Improved dairy cows and goats are emerging as important income alternatives for smallholder farmers.
Protecting fragile environments Higher crop yields and improved livestock production, resulting from habitat management strategies, have the potential to support rural households under existing circumstances. This can slow the migration of rural populations to areas designated for protection. Moreover, farmers using such strategies have less reason to use pesticides that could affect flora and fauna in the agro-ecosystem.
Income generation and gender empowerment Push-Pull has shown promising impacts of not only enhancing farm incomes but also empowering rural women. It provides alternative income sources, as surplus grain, fodder and Desmodium seed can be sold. It also has potential for improving the quality of rural life as more partners interact with farmers to disseminate it to other farmers.
The Push-Pull strategy has been adopted by more than 10 000 households in 19 districts in Kenya, five districts in Uganda,
David Amudavi, Zeyaur Khan and John Pickett
Millions of rural people in Eastern Africa depend on maize and sorghum for food security and cash income. Despite this, production of these crops is seriously affected by constraints such as stemborers, the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica , low and declining soil fertility, lack of knowledge on how to manage these pests and weaknesses in the extension system. Stemborers lead to yield losses of 30 - 40 percent, while Striga infestation causes a loss of 30 - 50 percent to Africa’s agricultural economy on 40 percent of its arable land. Although chemical control is usually recommended, it is uneconomical and impractical for many small- scale farmers, and has negative impacts on the environment and human health. On the other hand, the commonly used cultural method of uprooting Striga is labour-intensive and less effective. Adoption of effective control methods is limited due to lack of labour, little knowledge about the pest problems, and lack of other resources needed to make the necessary investments.
Affordable alternative strategies are needed to combat the growing threats to the smallholders’ livelihoods. One such method is the “Push-Pull” strategy. This combines knowledge of the chemical ecology and agro-biodiversity of the stemborer, with Striga management. This strategy was developed by scientists at the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) in Kenya and Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom, in collaboration with other research organisations in Eastern Africa. A first article about Push-Pull in LEISA Magazine (Vol.17 No.4, December 2001) presents it as a viable “organic” alternative to genetically modified maize (Bt maize). This article explains how the Push-Pull strategy has been adopted by farmers in Kenya since then.
Push-Pull uses a combination of legume repellent plants to deter the pest from the main crop (“push”) and trap crops to attract the repelled pest (“pull”). Molasses grass ( Melinis minutiflora) and Desmodium ( Desmodium uncinatum ) are the common repellents, whereas Napier grass ( Pennisetum purpureum) and Sudan grass ( Sorghum vulgare var. sudanense) are the common trap plants. Research has shown that the repellent plants produce chemical compounds, some of which repel the stemborer pests. On the other hand, during dusk Napier grass produces other chemical substances that evaporate easily, some of which are good attractants for stemborers to lay eggs. Fortunately, Napier grass produces a gummy substance which traps the resulting stemborer larvae, and only few survive to adulthood, thus reducing their population.
Push-Pull also suppresses and eliminates the Striga weed through several mechanisms, including nitrogen fixation, soil shading and allelopathy. Allelopathy is where one plant harms another with chemical substances: Desmodium roots produce such chemical compounds. Some of these compounds stimulate Striga seeds to germinate but others inhibit lateral growth and the attachment of the Striga roots on to maize roots. The Striga dies, and eventually the number of Striga seeds in the soil decreases. As Desmodium is a perennial crop, it controls Striga even when the host crop is out of season, making it a better repellent than other legumes.
The Push-Pull strategy is a good case of how basic research can contribute to the enhancement of agricultural productivity
the first season, the companion crops (Desmodium and Napier grass) are not fully established for farmers to learn how to manage them. Additionally, given the emphasis on learning by observation and discovery, learning how to conserve and utilise Push-Pull products is made easier during the second season. During this season farmers also learn how to establish Push-Pull plots using Desmodium vines and Desmodium seed multiplication plots. The curriculum also involves collecting relevant information for assessing the effectiveness of the Push- Pull strategy.
Following the successful launch of the Push-Pull curriculum in Bungoma district in western Kenya, in March 2007, ICIPE organised a first training workshop for FFS facilitators the following month. The objective was to train facilitators on the strategy, learn how to implement it in a field school, and develop facilitation and group management skills. The workshop was attended by experienced FFS facilitators from Bungoma and Busia districts and potential facilitators from Suba and Homa Bay districts, all in western Kenya. After the training, the facilitators from Bungoma and Busia started implementing the curriculum in the existing FFSs. Now there are 22 and 12 FFSs in Bungoma and Busia respectively. One such school in Bungoma, the Ngwelo FFS, started in 2005 initially to learn about conservation agriculture in growing groundnut and water melon. Its members had some prior knowledge about Push-Pull through the Push-Pull radio programme. Some of the FFS members were among a group of farmers who took a study tour to the ICIPE-Mbita station to see
and two districts in Tanzania. It is being promoted by the public extension system, non-governmental organisations, the private sector, and by regional partners in these three countries. Previously, the strategy has been disseminated through mass media (a radio programme called Tembea na Majira) , printed material (newspapers, brochures, information bulletins and posters), farmer field days comparing Push-Pull and conventional cropping systems, agricultural shows, farmer-to- farmer extension (farmer teachers), on-station demonstrations, and public meetings ( barazas). These methods have produced variable achievements.
The Farmer Field School (FFS) approach is now being used to disseminate this strategy as it is knowledge-intensive, and the FFS approach is likely to increase economies of scale by reaching out to many thousands or millions of farmers. The FFS approach uses a curriculum developed by stakeholders involving farmers, government extension staff, researchers, FFS and curriculum specialists, ICIPE scientists, and staff from NGOs and community-based organisations. The curriculum includes weekly sessions during two cropping seasons, largely based on the life cycle of maize, namely: (a) pre-season weekly sessions of five weeks covering activities that prepare the ground for FFS formation and implementation, (b) a first season of 21 weeks corresponding with the first maize cropping season activities, (c) first off-season sessions of two weeks involving relevant economic activities, and (d) a second season of 23 weeks corresponding with the second maize cropping season. The programme follows two seasons because during
Consolata enjoys talking about the success of her Push-Pull fields, and sharing her knowledge with others as an FFS facilitator.
Photo: Jimmy Pittchar / ICIPE