Euclidean Geometry exercise solutions 4, Exercises of Analytical Geometry and Calculus

These are solutions to problems taken from Marvin Greenberg's 'Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometries' textbook. The solutions are typed in latex and given in PDF format.

Typology: Exercises

2015/2016

Uploaded on 12/11/2016

unknown user
unknown user ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MAT 141
Homework 4 โ€“ Solutions
2) Formal Logic: Suppose that P, Q, R, S are true state-
ments and decide whether each of the following is true or
false.
a: โˆผ(P V Q)=> R
true
b: โˆผ(PโˆงQ)=>โˆผ R
true
c: (โˆผ(PโˆจQ)=> R)=> S
true
d: (โˆผ(P V Q)=> R)=> (SV โˆผQ)
true
e: (โˆผ(P V Q)=> R)=> (โˆผSV โˆผQ)
false
3) Consider the two models of incidence geometry discussed
in class and show that they fail the Betweenness Axioms.
Model a: Points are A, B, C; lines are l, m, n; l is incident
to A, B; m is incident to A, C; n is incident to B, C.
This interpretation is not a model for the Betweenness
Axioms. B-2 is violated. For instance, on m, there is no
point P between A and C.
Model b: Points are A, B, C, D; lines are l, m, n, o, p, q;
l is incident to A, B; m is incident to A, C; n is incident
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download Euclidean Geometry exercise solutions 4 and more Exercises Analytical Geometry and Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

MAT 141

Homework 4 โ€“ Solutions

  1. Formal Logic: Suppose that P, Q, R, S are true state- ments and decide whether each of the following is true or false. a: โˆผ (P V Q) => R true b: โˆผ (P โˆง Q) =>โˆผ R true c: (โˆผ (P โˆจ Q) => R) => S true d: (โˆผ (P V Q) => R) => (SV โˆผ Q) true e: (โˆผ (P V Q) => R) => (โˆผ SV โˆผ Q) false

  2. Consider the two models of incidence geometry discussed in class and show that they fail the Betweenness Axioms.

Model a: Points are A, B, C; lines are l, m, n; l is incident to A, B; m is incident to A, C; n is incident to B, C.

This interpretation is not a model for the Betweenness Axioms. B-2 is violated. For instance, on m, there is no point P between A and C.

Model b: Points are A, B, C, D; lines are l, m, n, o, p, q; l is incident to A, B; m is incident to A, C; n is incident

to A, D; o is incident to B, C; p is incident to B, D; q is incident to C, D.

This interpretation is not a model for the Betweenness Axioms. Again, B-2 is violated. For instance, here too, on m, there is no point P between A and C.

  1. The Fano plane is the following interpretation of the terms point, line, incidence: Points are A, B, C, D, E, F, G, lines are {A, B, D}, {A, C, G}, {D, E, G}, {B, C, E}, {A, E, F }, {B, F, G}, {D, C, F }. A line is incident to a point and vice versa if the point is one of the triple of points that are the line.

Prove that the Fano plane does not satisfy the Betweenness Axioms.

The Fano plane is not a model for the Betweenness Ax- ioms. Again, B-2 is violated. For instance, here too, on the line {A, C, G}, there is no point P between A and C.

  1. Prove Propositions 3.5 through 3.9.

You will be quizzed on Prop. 3.

Prop 3.5: Given A โˆ— B โˆ— C. Then AC = AB โˆช BC and B is the only point common to segments AB and BC.

Proof: (โІ) By Proposition 3.4, every point P on the line

Case 2: P is in BC. A similar argument shows that in this case too, P is in AC.

Thus AC = AB โˆช BC.

To see that B is the only point common to AB and BC, suppose that P is in both AB and BC. Since P is in AB, either P = A, or P = B, or A โˆ— P โˆ— B. (RAA) If P = A, then A is in BC, implying that either A = B, A = C, or B โˆ— A โˆ— C. Since A, B, C are distinct, it follows that Bโˆ—Aโˆ—C, which is equivalent to C โˆ— A โˆ— B. Hypothesis A โˆ— B โˆ— C together with Prop. 3.3 then gives C โˆ— A โˆ— C, which is a contradiction. Thus P โ‰  A. A similar argument shows that P โ‰  C. (RAA) If A โˆ— P โˆ— B, then hypothesis A โˆ— B โˆ— C together with Prop. 3.3 gives P โˆ— B โˆ— C. Since P is also in BC and P โ‰  A, the definition of seg- ment gives B โˆ— P โˆ— C. This contradicts Betweenness Axiom B-3. Hence P = B. โˆŽ

Prop 3.6: Given A โˆ— B โˆ— C. Then B is the only point

common to rays

รโ†’

BA and

รโ†’

BC, and

รโ†’

AB =

รโ†’

AC.

Proof: To see that B is the only point common to

รโ†’

BA and รโ†’ BC, suppose that P is in both

รโ†’

BA and

รโ†’

BC.

Since P is in

รโ†’

BA, by the definition of ray, either P is in

AB or B โˆ— A โˆ— P. Since P is in

รโ†’

BC, either P is in BC or B โˆ— C โˆ— P. Case 1: P is in AB and BC. In this case Prop. 3.5 gives P = B. Case 2: P is in AB and B โˆ— C โˆ— P. In this case, either P = A, P = B, or A โˆ— P โˆ— B. If P = A, then B โˆ— C โˆ— A while A โˆ— B โˆ— C by hypothesis. This contradicts Betweenness Axiom B-3. If A โˆ— P โˆ— B, then by Prop. 3.3, P โˆ— B โˆ— C. Since, in the case under consideration, B โˆ— C โˆ— P , this contradicts Betweenness Axiom B-3. Thus P = B. Case 3: (RAA) B โˆ— A โˆ— P and B โˆ— C โˆ— P. By Hypothesis, A โˆ— B โˆ— C, hence by the Corollary to Prop. 3.3, B โˆ— C โˆ— P implies that A โˆ— B โˆ— P. Thus B โˆ—Aโˆ—P and Aโˆ—B โˆ—P , contradicting Betweenness Axiom B-3. Thus in all possible cases, P = B.

To see that

รโ†’

AB =

รโ†’

AC, consider a point P. (โІ) If P is in

รโ†’

AB, then either P is in AB or A โˆ— B โˆ— P. If P is in AB, then by Prop. 3.5, P is in AC and hence

in

รโ†’

AC.

If A โˆ— B โˆ— P , then we consider how P lies with respect to C. By Betweenness Axiom B-3, either P โˆ—Aโˆ—C, or Aโˆ—P โˆ—C, or A โˆ— C โˆ— P. (RAA) If P โˆ— A โˆ— C, then since A โˆ— B โˆ— P (which is equivalent to P โˆ— B โˆ— A), Prop. 3.3 gives B โˆ— A โˆ— C.

Hence B โˆ— C โˆ— D. (โ‡’) Conversely, suppose that B โˆ— D โˆ— C. By the definition of angle and Proposition 3.6, A, B, C are not collinear. Then consider line

BC.

By Proposition 2.1,

BC meets

AB in the single point B. By Prop. 3.5, BC = BD โˆช DC and BD meets DC in the single point D.

Thus segment DC on line

BC does not contain B and

thus does not meet

AB.

Hence D lies on the same side of

AB as C. A similar argument shows that D lies on the same side of

AC as B. โˆŽ

Prop 3.8: If D is in the interior of โˆขCAB, then (a) so is

every other point on ray

รโ†’

AD except A; (b) no point on the

opposite ray to

รโ†’

AD is in the interior of โˆขCAB; and (c) if C โˆ— A โˆ— E, then B is in the interior of โˆขDAE.

Proof: (a) The line

AD meets the lines

AB and

AC in the point A. Since D is on a particular side of each of these lines, the

line

AD is not equal to either of these lines. By Prop. 2.1, A is the only point common to

AD and either one of these lines. In particular, segment of

AD meets lines

AB and

AC

only if A lies on this segment. Let P be a point on ray

รโ†’

AD other than A or D.

(RAA) If segment P D meets

AB, then segment P D includes A. Since P โ‰  A and P โ‰  D, we have P โˆ— A โˆ— D. Since P is a point on ray

รโ†’

AD other than A or D, we have either A โˆ— P โˆ— D (if P is in the segment AD) or A โˆ— D โˆ— P. This contradicts Betweenness Axiom B-3. Thus segment P D does not meet

AB, hence P lies on

the same side of

AB as D. A similar argument shows that P lies on the same side of

AC as D. Thus P is in the interior of โˆขCAB.

(b) The argument in Part (a) shows that the points on a ray all lie on the same side of a given line.

Points on the opposite ray to

รโ†’

AD lie on the opposite side of the lines as D. Thus they do not lie in the interior of โˆขCAB.

(c) By definition of interior of โˆขCAB, B lies on the same

side of

AC as D. Since C โˆ— A โˆ— E, C, A, E are collinear. Thus

AC =

AE.

So B lies on the same side of

AE as D. By Prop 3.7, since Bโˆ—Dโˆ—C, B does not lie in the interior of โˆขCAD. Since B lies on the same side of

AE =

AC as D, it follows that B lies on the opposite side

of

AD as C. The distinct lines

AD,

AC =

AE =

CE meet (only) in A.