Experiment 4 – Flyback Feedback Loop | ECEN 4517, Study notes of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Material Type: Notes; Professor: Erickson; Class: Renewable & Power Electronics Laboratory; Subject: Electrical & Computer Engineering; University: University of Colorado - Boulder; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 02/13/2009

koofers-user-4zc-1
koofers-user-4zc-1 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 19

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ECEN 4517 1
Lecture 7
ECEN 4517/5517
Step-up dc-dc converter
with isolation (flyback)
Feedback controller to
regulate HVDC
Experiment 4 part 2: flyback feedback loop
DC-AC inverter (H-bridge)
12 VDC HVDC: 120 - 200 VDC
AC load
120 Vrms
60 Hz
Battery
DC-AC
inverter
H-bridge
DC-DC
converter
Isolated
flyback
+
d(t)
Feedback
controller
Vref Digital
controller
d(t)
+
vac(t)
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13

Partial preview of the text

Download Experiment 4 – Flyback Feedback Loop | ECEN 4517 and more Study notes Electrical and Electronics Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

1

Lecture 7ECEN 4517/

Step-up dc-dc converterwith isolation (

flyback)

Feedback controller toregulate HVDC

Experiment 4 part 2:

flyback feedback loop

DC-AC inverter (H-bridge)

12 VDC

HVDC: 120 - 200 VDC

AC load120 Vrms60 Hz

Battery

DC-ACinverterH-bridge

DC-DCconverterIsolatedflyback

-^ + d(t) Feedbackcontroller

Vref^

d(t) Digitalcontroller

  • v(t)ac –

2

Due dates

Right now:Prelab assignment for Exp. 4 Part 1 (one from every student)Due within

five minutes of beginning of lecture This week in lab (Feb. 26-28):De

finitely

finish Exp. 3, and begin Exp. 4 Next week in lecture (Mar. 4):Prelab assignment for Exp. 4 Part 2 (one from every student)Next week in lab (Mar. 4-6):Exp. 3

final report due

ECEN 4517

4

Introduction: the need for feedback

Output voltage of aswitching converterdepends on duty cycle d , input voltage

v^ , and g load current

i^ .load^

+–

  • v(t) –

v(t)g

Switching converter

Load

Pulse-widthmodulator

v(t)c Transistorgate driver δ(t)

i(t)load

δ(t)

T^ dT t^ ss

v(t)

v(t)g i^ (t)load d(t)

Switching converter^ v(t)^ = Disturbances^ } Control input}

f(v^ ,^ ig

,^ d)load

We want to maintain a

fixed

v(^ t)^ , regardless of load or v

(^ t)g

5

Negative feedback:a switching regulator system

+ v –

vg

Switching converter

Powerinput^

Load –+

Compensator

vref

Referenceinput

Hv

Pulse-widthmodulator

vc

Transistorgate driver

δ^

G^ (s)c

H(s)

Errorsignal^ ve

Sensorgain

iload

7

Bode plot: control-to-output transfer functionbuck-boost or

flyback converter example

f

0 ˚ –90˚ –180˚ –270˚

||^ G^ ||vd^ G = 187 Vd^0 ⇒^ 45.5 dBV ||^ G^ ||^ vd^

∠^ Gvd

80 dBV60 dBV40 dBV20 dBV^ 0 dBV –20 dBV–40 dBV

Q^ =^4 ⇒

12 dB fz 2.6 kHzRHP

∠^ G^ vd

-1/2Q^10 f (^0) 1/2Q^10 f^0 0 ˚^

300 Hz 533 Hz

–20 dB/decade

–40 dB/decade

–270˚

f^ /10z^ 260 Hz

10 f^ z 26 kHz

1 MHz

10 Hz^

100 Hz^

1 kHz^

10 kHz^

100 kHz

f^0 400 Hz

8

The loop gain

T ( s

+–

  • v –

vg

Switching converter Powerinput^

Load –+ Compensator

vref Referenceinput

Hv

Pulse-widthmodulator

vc

Transistorgate driver

δ^

G^ (s)c

H(s) Errorsignal^ ve

Sensorgain iload

Loop gain T(s) = productof gains around thefeedback loopMore loop gain ||T||leads to better regulationof output voltageT(^ s) =

G(^ s)vd^

H(s)^ G

(^ s) /^ Vc

M

G(^ s) = power stage control-to-output transfer functionvd PWM gain = 1/

V.^ VM^ M

= pk-pk amplitude of PWM sawtooth

10

Example: a loop gain leading toa stable closed-loop system^  T(j

f^ )^ = – 112 c^

= 180 m^

˚^ – 112

˚^ = + 68

Crossoverfrequency^ fc

60 dB 40 dB 20 dB^ 0 dB –20 dB–40 dB

f fp^1

fz

||^ T^ ||

0 ˚ –90˚ –180˚ –270˚

ϕm

∠^ T

∠^ T

||^ T^ ||

1 Hz^

10 Hz^

100 Hz^

1 kHz^

10 kHz^

100 kHz

11

Example: a loop gain leading toan unstable closed-loop system^  T(j

f^ )^ = – 230 c^

= 180 m^

˚^ – 230

˚^ = – 50

Crossoverfrequency^ fc ˚

60 dB 40 dB 20 dB^ 0 dB –20 dB–40 dB

f fp^1 f

p^2 ||^ T^ ||

0 ˚ –90˚ –180˚ –270˚

∠^ T

∠^ T

||^ T^ ||

ϕ(< 0)m^

1 Hz^

10 Hz^

100 Hz^

1 kHz^

10 kHz^

100 kHz

13

Q^ vs.

 m

0 °^ 10 °^

20 °^

30 °^

40 °^

50 °^

60 °^

70 °^

80 °^

90 °

ϕm

Q

Q^ =^1 ⇒

0 dB^ Q^ = ϕ= 52˚m^ 0.5^ ⇒^ –6 dB

ϕ= 76m^

˚

20 dB15 dB10 dB5 dB 0 dB –5 dB–10 dB–15 dB –20 dB

14

Compensator circuit

+12V– + –12V^

3.9 V

Converter

vout

Vref

to pin 2of UC352510 kΩ

Integral controllerNext prelab:Select compensator element values (ECEN 4517)Design feedback loop (ECEN 5517) possibly with more complexcompensator

ECEN 4517

16

Effect of transformer leakage inductance +–

L^ M

  • v –

Vg

Q^1 1:n^ D^1 C Transformer modeli ig

R

Ll + v–l^

  • v(t)T –

-^ Leakage inductance

Lis caused byl^

imperfect coupling of primary andsecondary windings• Leakage inductance is effectively inseries with transistor

Q^1

-^ When MOSFET switches off, itinterrupts the current in

Ll

-^ Linduces a voltage spike acrossl^

Q^1

t V+^ v/ng^

v(t)T

iRon

{ DTs

Voltage spikecaused byleakageinductance^ v =^ L^ l^ l

di l^ dt

If the peak magnitude of thevoltage spike exceeds thevoltage rating of the MOSFET,then the MOSFET will fail.

17

Protection of Q

using a voltage-clamp snubber +–

  • v –

Vg

Q^1

D^1 1:n

C Flyback transformer ig

R

  • v(t)T – Cs Snubber^ {^ – R^ vss +

-^ Snubber provides a placefor current in leakageinductance to

flow after

Qhas turned off^1 • Peak transistor voltage isclamped to

V+^ vg^

s

-^ v>s^

V/n

-^ Energy stored in leakageinductance (plus more) istransferred to capacitor^ C, then dissipated ins

Rs

Usually,

Cis larges^

Decreasing

Rdecreases the peak transistor voltage but increases thes^

snubber power lossSee supplementary

flyback notes for an example of estimating

Cands^

Rs

19

Diode snubber

+–

L^ M

  • v –

Vg

Q^1

D^1 1:n

C

Transformer modeli ig

R

Ll^1 + v–l^1

  • v(t)T –

Ll^2

Diode snubber

-^ v+l^2

Damp the ringing with R-C snubber network^ Snubber capacitance similar in value to diode capacitanceSnubber resistance similar in value to resonant circuit characteristicimpedanceMore capacitance and/or smaller resistance

^ lower peak voltage,

larger snubber loss