Exploratory Study - General Psychology - Assignment, Exercises of Psychology

Exploratory Study, Randomly Assigned, Exploratory Study, Different Drugs, Motion Sickness, Four Treatment Conditions, Standard Deviation, Higher Mean, Means of Groups, Treatment Conditions. Its General Psychology assignment.

Typology: Exercises

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/13/2012

indian
indian 🇮🇳

3.9

(7)

134 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Assignment
1. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups in an exploratory study of the
effect of different drugs on motion sickness. The data provided below were subjected to
an analysis of variance, resulting in FOBT = 10.0.
n1 = 8 n2 = 7 n3 = 10 n4 = 7
x1 = 12.0 x2 = 6.5 x3 = 13.1 x4 = 8.5
First, determine whether the ANOVA is significant (with α .01), and, if so, determine
whether there is a significant difference between the mean scores of groups 2 and 3, 2
and 4, and 2 and 1, using the post hoc procedure that allows you to use α .01 for each
comparison.
2. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions. After treatment, the
following data were obtained:
n1 = 8 n2 = 10 n3 = 7 n4 = 9
x1 = 6.5 x2 = 5.5 x3 = 8.75 x4 = 12.0
In addition, the standard deviation of the scores of all 34 subjects was 3.50.
a) Before the experiment, the researcher predicted that group 3 would obtain a
significantly higher mean than group 2, and that there would be no significant difference
between the means of groups 1 and 2. Perform the appropriate test(s) to determine
whether these predictions were borne out. (α .05)
b) After the data had been collected, the researcher wished to determine whether there
was a significant difference between x4 and x1, and between x3 and x1. Using α .05,
perform the necessary test(s) and, when comparing these means, use whichever valid
procedure gives you the smallest critical value.
3. A researcher begins with a sample of 60 subjects and randomly assigns 12 to each of 5
treatment conditions. Based on his reading of other studies in the area, the researcher
predicts that group 3 will obtain a significantly different mean from group 1, and that
group 4 will obtain a significantly higher mean than group 1.
a) Given the following data (note that some subjects have dropped out) are the
researcher's predictions supported with α .01?
Docsity.com
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Exploratory Study - General Psychology - Assignment and more Exercises Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Assignment

  1. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups in an exploratory study of the effect of different drugs on motion sickness. The data provided below were subjected to an analysis of variance, resulting in FOBT = 10.0.

n 1 = 8 n 2 = 7 n 3 = 10 n 4 = 7

x 1 = 12.0 x 2 = 6.5 x 3 = 13.1 x 4 = 8.

First, determine whether the ANOVA is significant (with α ≤ .01), and, if so, determine whether there is a significant difference between the mean scores of groups 2 and 3, 2 and 4, and 2 and 1, using the post hoc procedure that allows you to use α ≤ .01 for each comparison.

  1. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions. After treatment, the following data were obtained:

n 1 = 8 n 2 = 10 n 3 = 7 n 4 = 9

x 1 = 6.5 x 2 = 5.5 x 3 = 8.75 x 4 = 12.

In addition, the standard deviation of the scores of all 34 subjects was 3.50.

a) Before the experiment, the researcher predicted that group 3 would obtain a significantly higher mean than group 2, and that there would be no significant difference between the means of groups 1 and 2. Perform the appropriate test(s) to determine whether these predictions were borne out. (α ≤ .05)

b) After the data had been collected, the researcher wished to determine whether there was a significant difference between x 4 and x 1 , and between x 3 and x 1. Using α ≤ .05, perform the necessary test(s) and, when comparing these means, use whichever valid procedure gives you the smallest critical value.

  1. A researcher begins with a sample of 60 subjects and randomly assigns 12 to each of 5 treatment conditions. Based on his reading of other studies in the area, the researcher predicts that group 3 will obtain a significantly different mean from group 1, and that group 4 will obtain a significantly higher mean than group 1.

a) Given the following data (note that some subjects have dropped out) are the researcher's predictions supported with α ≤ .01?

Docsity.com

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5

ni 8 10 10 12 12

Xi 43.5 45.2 61.8 77.3 66.

Si 5.6 6.3 5.4 8.7 7.

b) After collecting and inspecting the data, the researcher decides to perform three more tests. Specifically, he wishes to see whether X 3 is significantly different from X 2 ; whether X 5 is significantly different from X 2 ; and whether X 4 is significantly greater than X 2. Perform whichever statistical analyses are necessary and, if appropriate, use the procedure that allows each comparison to be tested with α ≤ .01.

Answers

  1. 2 vs. 3, q = 6.74, Reject H 0 , the mean scores of groups 2 and 3 differ significantly; 2 vs. 4, q = 2.04, Do not reject H 0 , there is no evidence for a significant difference between the mean scores of groups 2 and 4; 2 vs. 1, q = 5.62, Reject H 0 , the mean scores of groups 2 and 1 differ significantly.
  2. a) 3 vs. 2, t = 2.720, Reject H 0 , group 3 obtained a significantly higher mean score than group 2; 1 vs. 2, t = .870, Do not reject H0., there is no evidence for a significant difference between the mean scores of groups 1 and 2.

b) F = 12.92, Reject H 0 , at least 2 means differ significantly; 4 vs. 1, q = 6.56, Reject H 0 , the mean scores of groups 4 and 1 differ significantly; 3 vs. 1, q = 2.68, Do not reject H 0 , there is no evidence for a significant difference between groups 3 and 1.

  1. a) 3 vs. 1, t = 5.53, Reject H 0 , prediction is supported: group 3 obtained a significantly higher mean score than group 1; 4 vs. 1, t = 10.608, Reject H 0 , prediction is supported: group 4 obtained a significantly higher mean score than group 1; b) F = 43.696, Reject H 0 , at least 2 means differ significantly; 3 vs. 2, q = 7.583, Reject H 0 , the mean scores of groups 3 and 2 differ significantly; 5 vs. 2, q = 9.822, Reject H 0 , the mean scores of groups 5 and 2 differ significantly; 4 vs. 2, no test valid because post hoc tests cannot be 1-tailed.

Docsity.com