



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Original Essay about Facial Recognition written for Claudio Navarro, MSPE, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Analysis Portfolio:
Point (Green), Illustration (Yellow) and Explanation (Blue) According to the video “The world in 2018: Facial recognition technology will change the way we live” by The Economist Films, we may understand the that the benefits of using facial recognition daily and everywhere could bring us an infinite number of possibilities to make our life easy and safe. However, as every new technology there are some risks very important to consider, and related to the privacy of the people. The system of facial recognition use images and these are saved on giant databases, therefore, this information could be used for institutions to invade the personal life of the people without their consent. But, on the other hand, we have the implementation of the same technology in the new iPhone X, device that unlock the screen with certain recognition capabilities. And, people who use this new iPhone and liked it to use this functionality probably does not know the implications. The paragraph written originally in the diagnostic essay maybe contains some things that the PIE structure considers, however, without purpose and even less following a structure. Principally, I did not write a point introductory for the paragraph followed by an illustration, the explanations are vague and are not clearly linked to the illustration, and neither, I closed the paragraph properly, summarizing the main point of that paragraph in order to make a link with the thesis statement. After, after unit 1, I think that by not having a well-defined thesis statement, it is very unlikely to finish with a good essay. However, it is always possible follow the PIE structure. In future essays, I will begin with a point that makes it possible to make clear to the reader the content of that paragraph, then I will support that point with evidence, and finally, I will explain how that piece of evidence is linked with the thesis statement. In this way, the body of the essay will be easier to read and will make sense to the reader.
persons highly effective security measures. In this way, FR is spreading fast to new services and activities because they made life easy to everyone and its uses are inexhaustible.
On the other hand, in a good way technology is constantly challenging laws and regulations, because these were developed when still not even imagined the possibilities that the current technology offers us. For example, the 5th Amendment says: "… nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." (Constitution of USA). This was originally written in 1789 and revised in 1992, when private information such as emails, photos, text messages, contracts, etc., was not stored on giant databases scattered around the world and privacy issues related to these data was not supposed to be regulated. As an illustration, the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) from the state of Illinois is one of the first the examples of privacy law regarding biometric technology. “…Illinois was the first state to pass a comprehensive biometric privacy law, and only one other state (Texas) has followed a similar course.” (Bambauer, University of Arizona, 2017). Hence, clear evidence that regulations
advance and improve as technology opens up to unexplored lands, being the engine of change and adaptation for its users, industries, markets, innovation and regulatory framework. As a matter of fact, that is why it is so important that technological advances are seen as an opportunity to create more and better laws, because people breaches the privacy of other people, not technology, and the mechanisms that society has to prohibit the misuse or abuse of technology are regulations according to current times and behaviors.
Finally, giving up some privacy is the price that people should be willing to pay for the convenience, protections, and other benefits that facial recognition software provides. To illustrate, “… the debate about privacy in the western world was occasioned by the introduction
of the newspaper printing press and photography.” (van den Hoven, Blaauw, Pieters, Warnier, Stanford, 2014). In fact, from those days until now newspapers continue to be printed every day because they meet the objective of informing and the social benefit of the existence of the newspapers is greater than the cost of the "privacy" of the people or institutions that appear there. In addition, a survey conducted by Gigya, showed that a large part of the users of Social Networks are willing to put convenience above privacy concerns, even when it comes to personal information collected using Internet (Tsukayama, The Washington Post, 2014). Indeed, the reality is that technology consumers are the ones who, day by day, give up some privacy (cost), accepting terms and conditions of use (types of contracts) to receive the benefits of using the latest available technology. To tell the truth, it is difficult to measure the real benefit that a technology, as FR, could provide to a society. Nonetheless, the lives that can be saved by preventing a terrorist attack or the feeling of peace that can be granted to a society because people feel safe, could mean an unquestionable benefit when considering that they are desirable things for the majority, things that every country, city or region seeks to achieve. Therefore, considering the sacrifice of some privacy for the greater good seems reasonable.
To conclude, the use of FR should be allowed widely and totally legal because it brings even greater gains in issues such as security, identification and accessibility. In addition, it removes the field of privacy to promote improvement in laws related to the protection of abuse over citizens' information. Actually, all progress has a social cost that must be assumed and in the case of FR is some privacy. In spite of concerns about how FR may violate partially the privacy of the people, it is demonstrated that the applications of FR are extremely broad, becoming something of more and more recurrent use. Furthermore, efficiency and accuracy in all kind of security measures grant important benefits to private and public institutions, people, and even