final year project evaluation criteria, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Software Engineering

This document help the professor to evaluate their student in final year projects

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2019/2020

Uploaded on 02/07/2020

ali-farooq
ali-farooq 🇵🇰

4.7

(6)

5 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
The Superior College (University Campus) Lahore, Pakistan
Faculty of Computer Science & IT
Schedule - FYP-1 Evaluations - Fall 2017
Saturday, April 21, 2018
Project Title
Project ID
Supervisor
Evaluator
Muhammad Fawad Nasim
Performance
Marks
Scale
Excellent
5
Good
4
Above average
3
Below average
2
Poor
1
Extremely Poor
0
Deliverable
Marks
Student
1
Student
2
Student
3
Student
4
Student
5
Roll
No.
* Same for
all
Introduction / Objectives / Solution
5
SRS (Functional & Non-functional requirements)
20
Use Case diagram
5
Fully Dressed Use cases
10
Domain Model
10
Entity Relationship Diagram with data dictionary
20
Object Oriented approach (35)
-
Class Diagram
10
Sequence / Collaboration Diagram
10
Operation contracts
5
Activity Diagram
5
State Transition Diagram
5
Structured Approach (35)
-
Data Flow diagram [Level 0 and 1]
35
Component Diagram
5
Deployment Diagram
5
Implementation Approach / Practices
5
Prototype Demo
20
GRAND TOTAL
140
* check if marks are same for all

Partial preview of the text

Download final year project evaluation criteria and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Software Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

The Superior College (University Campus) Lahore, Pakistan

Faculty of Computer Science & IT

Schedule - FYP-1 Evaluations - Fall 2017

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Project Title Project ID Supervisor Evaluator Muhammad Fawad Nasim Performance Marks Scale Description Excellent 5 Student’s performance on the FYP is Excellent. 'A' quality work. Good 4 Student’s performance on the FYP is Good, but needs some changes. Between 'A' and 'B' quality work. Above average 3 Student’s performance on the FYP is Above average and requires many improvements. Between 'B' and 'C' quality work. Needs re-evaluation Below average 2 Student’s performance on the FYP is Below average and requires some major changes. Between 'C' and 'D' quality work. Needs re-evaluation Poor 1 Student’s performance on the FYP is Poor. Between 'D' and 'F' quality work. Extremely Poor 0 Student’s performance on the FYP is Extremely poor. Need major improvements. 'F' quality work. Deliverable Marks Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Roll No. * Same for

all 

Introduction / Objectives / Solution 5 SRS (Functional & Non-functional requirements) 20 Use Case diagram 5 Fully Dressed Use cases 10 Domain Model 10 Entity Relationship Diagram with data dictionary 20 Object Oriented approach (35) - Class Diagram 10 Sequence / Collaboration Diagram 10 Operation contracts 5 Activity Diagram 5 State Transition Diagram 5 Structured Approach (35) - Data Flow diagram [Level 0 and 1] 35 Component Diagram 5 Deployment Diagram 5 Implementation Approach / Practices 5 Prototype Demo 20

GRAND TOTAL 140

  • check if marks are same for all