Financial Ratios Notes, Lecture notes of Financial Management

Financial Ratios Notes Financial Ratios Notes Financial Ratios Notes

Typology: Lecture notes

2018/2019

Uploaded on 12/06/2019

v-des
v-des 🇵🇭

3

(1)

3 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Current Ratio
The current ratio is a liquidity and efficiency ratio that measures a
firm’s ability to pay off its short-term liabilities with its current
assets. The current ratio is an important measure of liquidity
because short-term liabilities are due within the next year.
This means that a company has a limited amount of time in order to
raise the funds to pay for these liabilities. Current assets like cash,
cash equivalents, and marketable securities can easily be converted
into cash in the short term. This means that companies with larger
amounts of current assets will more easily be able to pay off
current liabilities when they become due without having to sell off
long-term, revenue generating assets.
ANALYSIS
The current ratio is a liquidity and efficiency ratio that measures a
firm’s ability to pay off its short-term liabilities with its current
assets. The current ratio is an important measure of liquidity
because short-term liabilities are due within the next year.
This means that a company has a limited amount of time in order to
raise the funds to pay for these liabilities. Current assets like cash,
cash equivalents, and marketable securities can easily be converted
into cash in the short term. This means that companies with larger
amounts of current assets will more easily be able to pay off
current liabilities when they become due without having to sell off
long-term, revenue generating assets.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
The current ratio compares all of a company’s current
assets to its current liabilities. These are usually defined as
assets that are cash or will be turned into cash in a year or
less, and liabilities that will be paid in a year or less.
The current ratio is sometimes referred to as the “working
capital” ratio and helps investors understand more about a
company’s ability to cover its short-term debt with its
current assets.
Weaknesses of the current ratio include the difficulty of
comparing the measure across industry groups,
overgeneralization of the specific asset and liability
balances, and the lack of trending information.
Interpreting the Current Ratio
A ratio under 1 indicates that the company’s debts due in a
year or less are greater than its assets (cash or other short-
term assets expected to be converted to cash within a year
or less.)
On the other hand, in theory, the higher the current ratio,
the more capable a company is of paying its obligations
because it has a larger proportion of short-term
asset value relative to the value of its short-term liabilities.
However, while a high ratio, say over 3, could indicate the
company can cover its current liabilities three times, it may
indicate that it's not using its current assets efficiently, is
not securing financing very well, or is not managing its
working capital.
Acid-Test Ratio
The acid-test ratio uses a firm's balance sheet data as an indicator
of whether it has sufficient short-term assets to cover its short-term
liabilities. This metric is more useful in certain situations than the
current ratio, also known as the working capital ratio, since it
ignores assets such as inventory, which may be difficult to quickly
liquidate. The acid-test ratio is also commonly known as the quick
ratio.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
The acid-test, or quick ratio, compares a company's most
short-term assets to its most short-term liabilities to see if
a company has enough cash to pay its immediate liabilities,
such as short-term debt.
The acid-test ratio disregards current assets that are
difficult to liquidate quickly such as inventory.
The acid-test ratio may not give a reliable picture of a
firm's financial condition if the company has accounts
receivable that take longer than usual to collect or current
liabilities that are due but have no immediate payment
needed.
The acid-test ratio involves assessing a company's balance
sheet to see whether it has enough funding on hand to
cover its current debt.
It is seen as more useful than the often-used current ratio
since the acid-test excludes inventory, which can be hard
to quickly liquidate.
In the best-case scenario, a company should have a ratio of
1 or more, suggesting the company has enough cash to
pay its bills.
Too low a ratio can suggest a company is cash-strapped,
but in some cases, it just means a company is dependent
on inventory, like retailers.
Too high a ratio could mean a company is sitting on cash,
but in some cases, that's just industry-specific, like with
some tech companies.
The minimum acid-test ratio a company should have. Firms with a ratio
of less than 1 are short on liquid assets to pay their current debt
obligations or bills and should, therefore, be treated with caution.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
Inventory turnover is the number of times a company sells and
replaces its stock of goods during a period. Inventory turnover
provides insight as to how the company manages costs and how
effective their sales efforts have been.
The higher the inventory turnover, the better since a high
inventory turnover typically means a company is selling
goods very quickly and that demand for their product
exists.
Low inventory turnover, on the other hand, would likely
indicate weaker sales and declining demand for a
company’s products.
Inventory turnover provides insight as to whether a
company is managing its stock properly. The company may
have overestimated demand for their products and
purchased too many goods as shown by low turnover.
Conversely, if inventory turnover is very high, they might
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Financial Ratios Notes and more Lecture notes Financial Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Current Ratio The current ratio is a liquidity and efficiency ratio that measures a firm’s ability to pay off its short-term liabilities with its current assets. The current ratio is an important measure of liquidity because short-term liabilities are due within the next year. This means that a company has a limited amount of time in order to raise the funds to pay for these liabilities. Current assets like cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities can easily be converted into cash in the short term. This means that companies with larger amounts of current assets will more easily be able to pay off current liabilities when they become due without having to sell off long-term, revenue generating assets. ANALYSIS The current ratio is a liquidity and efficiency ratio that measures a firm’s ability to pay off its short-term liabilities with its current assets. The current ratio is an important measure of liquidity because short-term liabilities are due within the next year. This means that a company has a limited amount of time in order to raise the funds to pay for these liabilities. Current assets like cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities can easily be converted into cash in the short term. This means that companies with larger amounts of current assets will more easily be able to pay off current liabilities when they become due without having to sell off long-term, revenue generating assets. KEY TAKEAWAYS  The current ratio compares all of a company’s current assets to its current liabilities. These are usually defined as assets that are cash or will be turned into cash in a year or less, and liabilities that will be paid in a year or less.  The current ratio is sometimes referred to as the “working capital” ratio and helps investors understand more about a company’s ability to cover its short-term debt with its current assets.  Weaknesses of the current ratio include the difficulty of comparing the measure across industry groups, overgeneralization of the specific asset and liability balances, and the lack of trending information. Interpreting the Current Ratio  A ratio under 1 indicates that the company’s debts due in a year or less are greater than its assets (cash or other short- term assets expected to be converted to cash within a year or less.)

 On the other hand, in theory, the higher the current ratio,

the more capable a company is of paying its obligations because it has a larger proportion of short-term asset value relative to the value of its short-term liabilities. However, while a high ratio, say over 3, could indicate the company can cover its current liabilities three times, it may indicate that it's not using its current assets efficiently, is not securing financing very well, or is not managing its working capital. Acid-Test Ratio The acid-test ratio uses a firm's balance sheet data as an indicator of whether it has sufficient short-term assets to cover its short-term liabilities. This metric is more useful in certain situations than the current ratio, also known as the working capital ratio, since it ignores assets such as inventory, which may be difficult to quickly liquidate. The acid-test ratio is also commonly known as the quick ratio. KEY TAKEAWAYS  The acid-test, or quick ratio, compares a company's most short-term assets to its most short-term liabilities to see if a company has enough cash to pay its immediate liabilities, such as short-term debt.  The acid-test ratio disregards current assets that are difficult to liquidate quickly such as inventory.  The acid-test ratio may not give a reliable picture of a firm's financial condition if the company has accounts receivable that take longer than usual to collect or current liabilities that are due but have no immediate payment needed.  The acid-test ratio involves assessing a company's balance sheet to see whether it has enough funding on hand to cover its current debt.  It is seen as more useful than the often-used current ratio since the acid-test excludes inventory, which can be hard to quickly liquidate.  In the best-case scenario, a company should have a ratio of 1 or more, suggesting the company has enough cash to pay its bills.  Too low a ratio can suggest a company is cash-strapped, but in some cases, it just means a company is dependent on inventory, like retailers.  Too high a ratio could mean a company is sitting on cash, but in some cases, that's just industry-specific, like with some tech companies. The minimum acid-test ratio a company should have. Firms with a ratio of less than 1 are short on liquid assets to pay their current debt obligations or bills and should, therefore, be treated with caution. Inventory Turnover Ratio Inventory turnover is the number of times a company sells and replaces its stock of goods during a period. Inventory turnover provides insight as to how the company manages costs and how effective their sales efforts have been.  The higher the inventory turnover, the better since a high inventory turnover typically means a company is selling goods very quickly and that demand for their product exists.  Low inventory turnover, on the other hand, would likely indicate weaker sales and declining demand for a company’s products.  Inventory turnover provides insight as to whether a company is managing its stock properly. The company may have overestimated demand for their products and purchased too many goods as shown by low turnover. Conversely, if inventory turnover is very high, they might

not be buying enough inventory and may be missing out on sales opportunities.  Inventory turnover also shows whether a company’s sales and purchasing departments are in sync. Ideally, inventory should match sales. It can be quite costly for companies to hold onto inventory that isn’t selling, which is why inventory turnover can be an important indicator of sales effectiveness but also for managing operating costs. Alternatively, for a given amount of sales, using less inventory to do so will improve inventory turnover. The Bottom Line The inventory turnover ratio is an effective measure of how well a company is turning its inventory into sales. The ratio also shows how well management is managing the costs associated with inventory and whether they're buying too much inventory or too little. Additionally, inventory turnover shows how well the company sells its goods. If sales or down or the economy is under- performing, it may show up as a lower inventory turnover ratio. Usually, a higher inventory turnover ratio is preferred, as it indicates that more sales are being generated given a certain amount of inventory. Sometimes a very high inventory ratio could result in lost sales, as there is not enough inventory to meet demand. It is always important to compare the inventory turnover ratio to the industry benchmark to assess if a company is successfully managing its inventory. Day sales outstanding Fixed Asset Turnover The fixed asset turnover ratio (FAT) is, in general, used by analysts to measure operating performance. This efficiency ratio compares net sales (income statement) to fixed assets (balance sheet) and measures a company's ability to generate net sales from its fixed- asset investments, namely property, plant, and equipment (PP&E). The fixed asset balance is used as a net of accumulated depreciation. In general, a higher fixed asset turnover ratio indicates that a company has more effectively utilized investment in fixed assets to generate revenue. Interpreting the Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio A higher turnover ratio is indicative of greater efficiency in managing fixed-asset investments, but there is not an exact number or range that dictates whether a company has been efficient at generating revenue from such investments. For this reason, it is important for analysts and investors to compare a company’s most recent ratio to both its own historical ratios and ratio values from peer companies and/or average ratios for the company's industry as a whole. Though the FAT ratio is of significant importance in certain industries, an investor or analyst must determine whether the company under study is in the appropriate sector or industry for the ratio to be calculated before attaching much weight to it. Fixed assets vary drastically from one company type to the next. As an example, consider the difference between an Internet company and a manufacturing company. An Internet company, such as Facebook, has a significantly smaller fixed asset base than a manufacturing giant, such as Caterpillar. Clearly, in this example, Caterpillar’s fixed asset turnover ratio is of more relevance and should hold more weight, than Facebook’s FAT ratio. KEY TAKEAWAYS  The fixed asset turnover ratio reveals how efficient a company is at generating sales from its existing fixed assets.  A higher ratio result implies that management is using its fixed assets more effectively.  A high FAT ratio does not tell anything about a company's ability to generate solid profits or cash flows.  The fixed asset turnover ratio is an efficiency ratio that measures how well a company uses its fixed assets to generate sales.  It is calculated by dividing net sales by the net of its property, plant, and equipment.  A high ratio indicates that a company efficiently uses its fixed assets to generate sales, whereas a low ratio indicates that the firm does not efficiently use its fixed assets to generate sales.  Investors use the ratio to determine their return on investment (ROI), and creditors use it to assess how well a company can repay loans used to purchase equipment. Total assets turnover ratio The higher the asset turnover ratio, the more efficient a company. Conversely, if a company has a low asset turnover ratio, it indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate sales. KEY TAKEAWAYS  Asset turnover is the ratio of total sales or revenue to average assets.  This metric helps investors understand how effectively companies are using their assets to generate sales.  Investors use the asset turnover ratio to compare similar companies in the same sector or group.  It is a tool to see which firms are making the most use of their assets and to identify weaknesses in firms. The asset turnover ratio is calculated on an annual basis. The total assets number used in the denominator can be calculated

The greater a company's earnings in proportion to its assets (and the greater the coefficient from this calculation), the more effectively that company is said to be using its assets. The ROTA, expressed as a percentage or decimal, provides insight into how much money is generated from each dollar invested into the organization. This allows the organization to see the relationship between its resources and its income, and it can provide a point of comparison to determine if an organization is using its assets more or less effectively than it had previously. In circumstances where the company earns a new dollar for each dollar invested in it, the ROTA is said to be one, or 100 percent. KEY TAKEAWAYS  The return on total assets shows how effectively a company uses its assets to generate earnings.  The ROTA metric can be used to determine which companies are reporting the most efficient use of their assets as compared with their earnings.  Some concern exists about ROTA relying on the book value of total assets rather than their market value, giving a return that looks higher than it should be in reality. Return on Common Equity The Return on Common Equity (ROCE) ratio refers to the return that common equity investors receive on their investment. ROCE is different from Return on Equity (ROE) in that it isolates the return that the company sees on its common equity, rather than measure the total returns that the company generated on all of its equity. Capital received from investors as preferred equity is excluded from this calculation, thus making the ratio more representative of common equity investor returns. Return on Common Equity is used by some investors to assess the likelihood and size of dividends that the company may pay out in the future. A high ROCE indicates the company is generating high profits from its equity investments, thus making dividend payouts more likely. The ROCE ratio can also be used to evaluate how well the company’s management has utilized equity capital to generate values. A high ROCE suggests that the company’s management is making good use of equity capital by investing in NPV-positive projects. This should create more value for the company’s shareholders. DuPont Equation The DuPont analysis (also known as the DuPont identity or DuPont model) is a framework for analyzing fundamental performance popularized by the DuPont Corporation. DuPont analysis is a useful technique used to decompose the different drivers of return on equity (ROE). Decomposition of ROE allows investors to focus on the key metrics of financial performance individually to identify strengths and weaknesses. There are three major financial metrics that drive return on equity (ROE): operating efficiency, asset use efficiency and financial leverage. Operating efficiency is represented by net profit margin or net income divided by total sales or revenue. Asset use efficiency is measured by the asset turnover ratio. Leverage is measured by the equity multiplier, which is equal to average assets divided by average equity. KEY TAKEAWAYS  The DuPont analysis is a framework for analyzing fundamental performance originally popularized by the DuPont Corporation.  DuPont analysis is a useful technique used to decompose the different drivers of return on equity (ROE).  An investor can use analysis like this to compare the operational efficiency of two similar firms. Managers can use DuPont analysis to identify strengths or weaknesses that should be addressed.  By splitting ROE into three parts, companies can more easily understand changes in their returns on equity over time.  As profit margin increases, every sale will bring more money to a company’s bottom line, resulting in a higher overall return on equity.  As asset turnover increases, a company will generate more sales per asset owned, resulting in a higher overall return on equity.  Increased financial leverage will also lead to an increase in return on equity, since using more debt financing brings on higher interest payments, which are tax deductible. Components of the DuPont Equation: Profit Margin Profit margin is a measure of profitability. It is an indicator of a company’s pricing strategies and how well the company controls costs. Profit margin is calculated by finding the net profit as a percentage of the total revenue. As one feature of the DuPont equation, if the profit margin of a company increases, every sale will bring more money to a company’s bottom line, resulting in a higher overall return on equity. Components of the DuPont Equation: Asset Turnover Asset turnover is a financial ratio that measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate sales revenue or sales income for the company. Companies with low profit margins tend to have high asset turnover, while those with high profit margins tend to have low asset turnover. Similar to profit margin, if asset turnover increases, a company will generate more sales per asset owned, once again resulting in a higher overall return on equity. Components of the DuPont Equation: Financial Leverage Financial leverage refers to the amount of debt that a company utilizes to finance its operations, as compared with the amount of equity that the company utilizes. As was the case with asset turnover and profit margin, Increased financial leverage will also lead to an increase in return on equity. This is because the increased use of debt as financing will cause a company to have higher interest payments, which are tax deductible. Because dividend payments are not tax deductible, maintaining a high

proportion of debt in a company’s capital structure leads to a higher return on equity. The DuPont Equation in Relation to Industries The DuPont equation is less useful for some industries, that do not use certain concepts or for which the concepts are less meaningful. On the other hand, some industries may rely on a single factor of the DuPont equation more than others. Thus, the equation allows analysts to determine which of the factors is dominant in relation to a company’s return on equity. For example, certain types of high turnover industries, such as retail stores, may have very low profit margins on sales and relatively low financial leverage. In industries such as these, the measure of asset turnover is much more important. High margin industries, on the other hand, such as fashion, may derive a substantial portion of their competitive advantage from selling at a higher margin. For high end fashion and other luxury brands, increasing sales without sacrificing margin may be critical. Finally, some industries, such as those in the financial sector, chiefly rely on high leverage to generate an acceptable return on equity. While a high level of leverage could be seen as too risky from some perspectives, DuPont analysis enables third parties to compare that leverage with other financial elements that can determine a company’s return on equity.