for Crop Science, Study notes of Plant physiology

plant physiology, and cropping system sciences to develop im- proved varieties of agronomic, turf, ... How do we best define complex, multilevel interac-.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/01/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 🇵🇭

4.4

(655)

10K documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Science
4 CSA News June 2012
by Joseph G. Lauer, Caron Gala Bijl, Michael A. Grusak, P. Stephen
Baenziger, Ken Boote, Sarah Lingle, Thomas Carter, Shawn Kaeppler,
Roger Boerma, Georgia Eizenga, Paul Carter, Major Goodman,
Emerson Nafziger, Kimberlee Kidwell, Rob Mitchell, Michael D.
Edgerton, Ken Quesenberry, and Martha C. Willcox
Grand Challenges
for Crop Science
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download for Crop Science and more Study notes Plant physiology in PDF only on Docsity!

Science

4 CSA News June 2012

by Joseph G. Lauer, Caron Gala Bijl, Michael A. Grusak, P. Stephen Baenziger, Ken Boote, Sarah Lingle, Thomas Carter, Shawn Kaeppler, Roger Boerma, Georgia Eizenga, Paul Carter, Major Goodman, Emerson Nafziger, Kimberlee Kidwell, Rob Mitchell, Michael D. Edgerton, Ken Quesenberry, and Martha C. Willcox

Grand Challenges

for Crop Science

Editor’s note: The following article was originally published in the May–June 2012 issue of Crop Science (52:1003–1010). Due to space constraints, the opening section and the Reference section are omitted here but can be viewed in the original article, which is available at www.crops.org/publications/cs/ tocs/52/3. In 2009, CSSA, ASA, and SSSA leaders met with Dr. Rajiv Shah, who, at the time, served as Under Secretary of Research, Education, and Eco- nomics and Chief Scientist at the USDA. During the meeting, Shah appealed to the Societies to identify transformative questions to guide science in solv- ing issues related to climate change, food security, bioenergy production, human health and nutrition, and ecosystem health. In response to this charge, the CSSA Grand Challenge Committee (CGCC) was formed to develop and communicate the challenges, which are outlined in this article.

June 2012 CSA News 5

iStockphoto/nicolas_

plant physiology, and cropping system sciences to develop im- proved varieties of agronomic, turf, and forage crops to produce feed, food, fuel, and fiber for our world’s growing population. During the last century, crop science has achieved feats that are now part of everyday life and taken for granted.

Despite these scientific achievements, the world today faces ever-growing challenges of widespread food insecurity and malnutrition, negative impacts of climate change, environmental degradation, and dependence on fossil fuel energy. Solutions to these challenges will be found, in part, through sustained, federal investment in crop science to address these challenges. CSSA or- ganized a committee to identify key grand challenges associated with crop science that, when addressed, will provide the tools, technologies, and solutions required to address these challenges.

Crop science is a highly integrative science

using the disciplines of conventional plant

breeding, transgenic crop improvement,

June 2012 CSA News 7

  1. Adequate infrastructure (laboratories, personnel, and experience with integrated approaches) to mount a sustained long-term responsiveness to continuing abiotic stresses.

Grand Challenge: Resistance to

Biotic Stresses

Increase durability of resistance to biotic stresses that threaten food security in major crops

Background

Organisms that cause biotic stresses in crop plants are continually adjusting their pathogen- ic mechanisms to take advantage of the plant’s limited defenses. Unfortunately, with new intensive management practices being adopted and climate change altering environmental conditions, the rate of adjustment by some pathogens has accelerated. Furthermore, crop uniformity can increase genetic vulnerability to various pests. For example, U.S. soybean cultivars are almost uniformly susceptible to two relatively new U.S. biotic stresses: soybean aphid and soybean rust.

Contemporary best management practices that retain plant residues on the field result in increased soil organic matter, improved soil quality, and additional sequestered C; however, they also provide an environment where patho- gens can prosper and cause reduced yields. Examples include pathogens such as gray leaf spot of corn whose inoculum grows on previous crop residue. Carcinogenic af- latoxins are produced by fungi whose proliferation increas- es in stress environments of drought, high temperature, and/or high humidity. Therefore, there is a need for plant genomic tools that can identify novel resistance genes and assist in their rapid incorporation into improved cultivars.

Key Questions

  1. What are the molecular and physiological mechanisms by which various pathogens and pests interact with plants? How can these interactions provide novel and durable approaches for defense mechanisms?
  2. How do we efficiently identify novel resistance genes in our extensive germplasm collections?
  3. How do we incorporate resistance genes effectively without limiting progress for improving yield?
  4. How can genomic tools be used with germplasm to uncover the molecular basis for resistance to biotic stresses? 5. How do we develop and use gene-specific markers to combine and deploy resistance genes so that the risk of crop loss is minimized?

Expected Outcomes

  1. Prevention of widespread crop yield and quality losses as plant diseases and pests evolve and spread due to climate change.
  2. Enhanced year-to-year stability of food, feed, fiber, and biofuel production.
  3. Improved human and animal health by increasing crop resistance to mycotoxins and aflatoxin.

Grand Challenge: Management for Resource-Limited Systems Create novel crop varieties and management approaches designed for problem soils and low-input farming to increase economic prosperity for farmers and overcome world hunger

Background Agricultural productivity is limited in many areas by poor soil conditions and high fertilizer prices. However, soil tilth issues including high soil pH or toxic Al and salt levels are not easily remedied by conventional high-input approaches. As a result, new crop varieties and manage- ment practices are needed that reduce dependence on agricultural inputs and overcome common soil problems. Multidisciplinary research teams will be the key to success

Gray leaf spot of corn. Photo by the Department of Plant Pa- thology Archive, North Carolina State University, Bugwood.org.

Science

8 CSA News June 2012

because they have the expertise to improve N fixation in legume crops and improve nutrient uptake and use and can develop crop varieties that are tolerant of such soil limita- tions. Team research should focus on efficient and reliable methods to identify desirable crop germplasm that has the right genetic makeup to deliver these improvements. When coupled with technology transfer, these efforts will increase yields and quality of food crops and ameliorate food secu- rity and nutritional deficiencies at home and abroad.

Key Questions

  1. How do soils, weather, genetics, and management practices interact and influence root growth and nutri- ent uptake and N fixation?
  2. What are the most reliable, efficient, and inexpensive methods that accurately predict the worth of a genetic trait or gene in low-input agriculture (for efficient use of limiting soil nutrients)?
  3. Which genetic traits have the greatest impact on nutri- ent use efficiency, and how do these traits interact with each other and the environment?
  4. How do we ensure optimal partitioning of limited nu- trient resources to the economically important portions of the crop? 5. Can genomic methods provide better understanding of host plant–rhizobial strain interactions and rhizobial– soil interactions? 6. How might crop, nutritional, and soil factors be man- aged to sustainably and consistently improve crop performance and yields? Can commercial mycorrhizae applications improve plant nutrient uptake?

Expected Outcomes

  1. Reduced need for the application of N fertilizers through enhanced biological N fixation by microorgan- isms in association with crop plants.
  2. Reduced need for P fertilization or use of other soil amendments if roots–mycorrhizae systems can more adequately provide nutrient uptake for the crop.
  3. Improved energy balance for biofuel production.
  4. More economically and environmentally sound farm- ing systems.
  5. Increased yields, crop nutrient quality, and food secu- rity in resource-scarce environments.

Grand Challenge: Crop Management Systems Create novel crop management systems that are resilient in the face of changes in climate and rural demographics

Background Agriculture is constantly adapting to change; consider the revolutions in agricul- ture due to irrigation, fertilizer, weed, insect, and disease control, and modern tillage sys- tems. We will need to make similar changes to our cropping systems as we face future changes in our climate and an increased need for using resources efficiently. Eighty to ninety percent of our food is produced on large-scale farms, usually operated by family entities. To ensure the greatest advances in productivity, environ- mental sustainability, and profitability, new crop management information and technol- ogy systems need to be adopted for farms of various scales. Such innovations should encourage integrated pest management and water and soil conservation in ways that are practical and conve- nient for large-scale farms. There are several tools that can make this possible, such as remote sensing and other off-site monitoring. The synergy between variety development and

Photo courtesy of Texas AgriLife Research.

Science

10 CSA News June 2012

  • understand the ecosystem services (C sequestration, water quality, wildlife habitat, etc.) from perennial bio- energy crop production on arable and marginal lands, and
  • develop new production systems that thrive in low- input situations.

Key Questions

  1. What genetic improvements to the composition and field productivity of biofuel feedstock crops optimize conversion processes while also improving production efficiency?
  2. What steps do we need to take to develop or tailor bio- fuel feedstock cropping systems appropriate to diverse agroecosystems? 3. What crop management strategies can we develop and use to increase

soil C, minimize production inputs, and ultimately increase economic return for the grower?

  1. How do we optimize use of N-fixing plants into bioen- ergy cropping systems?
  2. What biomass biofuel crops and cropping systems can be developed that are highly productive and reduce the total land area required to meet demand?

Expected Outcomes

  1. Reduced dependence on fossil fuels by providing sustainable renewable energy alternatives.
  2. Increased number of crops and cultivars that have proven metrics for productivity and high fuel conversion efficiency rates.
  3. Low-input management systems for the production of biofuel crops in diverse ecosystems.
  4. Strategies to meet increasing global de- mand for food, feed, fiber, and fuel on a decreasing land base with fewer inputs.
  5. Increased profitability for producers of bioenergy feedstocks.

Grand Challenge: Bioresources Genotyping the major crop germplasm collections to facili- tate identification of gene treasures for breeding and genet- ics research and deployment of superior genes into adapted germplasm around the globe

Background Germplasm collections are a wonderful treasure trove of genetic diversity and the foundation for all crop improve- ment programs. A germplasm collection for a single crop species may contain more than 50,000 distinct genetic plant types, yet the genomic profiles are not readily available, limiting application of information contained in the col- lections. However, new inexpensive technologies offer a low-cost remedy for developing detailed genetic profiles to entire collections. As a result, new genomics information will enhance our ability to correlate a plant’s genotype with its agricultural performance for plant breeding purposes in a way never before possible. To translate the economically important diver- sity of germplasm collections into food and other agricultural products, it is critical that we inte- grate this new genomics information with a series of field-breeding positions specifically

A sample of the range of colors, shapes, sizes, and textures of cotton leaves, bolls, and seeds in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. Photo by Peggy Greb (USDA-ARS).

June 2012 CSA News 11

targeted at “mining” germplasm collections. Field breeders will use hybridization and selection, informed by genomics, to produce novel, agronomically important genetic types that work effectively in agriculture. As a result, develop- ment of crops will be accelerated to avoid famines and market-place catastrophes resulting from fluctuations in rainfall, diseases, and pests, therefore enabling greater food security around the world.

Key Questions

  1. Can we develop a system and the resources to use high-throughput gene chip technology to create genetic

profiles of individual entries within germplasm bank collections of major crops?

  1. What information management systems and related protocols can we develop that enable breeders, ge- neticists, and biological information technologists to understand, access, and effectively use extensive DNA marker profiles for germplasm collections of major crops?
  2. Can we capitalize on the value of novel gene discover- ies by developing crop-specific molecular markers to facilitate rapid cultivar improvement?
  3. Can improved methods for establishing genotype– phenotype relationships be developed for vital genes in all major crops?
  4. Can genetic manipulation techniques and new genetic tools be customized for each major crop and incor- porated into plant breeding practices (e.g., doubled haploidy, transformation, marker-assisted breeding

strategies, and genome-wide selection) to accelerate the time to field evaluation stage?

  1. Can the capabilities and capacities of regional and international research centers be enhanced to expedite new cultivar releases?
  2. Can we create a new cadre of plant scientists and field- oriented plant breeding positions specifically targeted at “mining” the genetic diversity found in germplasm collections and integrating new genomics informa- tion above to produce novel agronomically important breeding materials?

Expected Outcomes

  1. Intelligent sampling strategies for gene mining within germplasm collections to expand the dangerously narrow genetic base of our major crops.
  2. Higher crop yields through multiple, creative strategies using many genes from different sources for controlling diseases, combating insects, and minimizing climate stresses.
  3. Enhanced food security, greater research efficiency, and production stability.
  4. Efficient and sustained translation of prod- ucts from gene discovery to agronomically adapted breeding materials for farmers’ fields to proactively address shifts in pest dynamics and climate.

Informing Science Policy with the CSSA Grand

Challenges Quickly after the release of its initial grand challenges booklet, CSSA submitted all six of the grand challenges to the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, in re- sponse to its request for information (RFI) on the “grand challenges for the 21st century.” In the resulting Strategy for American Innovation , released exactly one year after the RFI, there was little mention of specific disciplines. The document focused rather on the broader issues underly- ing science education and workforce development, global competition for the skilled labor force, and U.S. economic stimulation. The grand challenges document enabled CSSA to present a solid vision of the role of crop science in addressing the key societal challenge areas. The challenges have been used to communicate CSSA’s priorities to the USDA, U.S. De- partment of Energy, and the U.S. Agency for International Development as well as the National Science Foundation,