Geodesics and Length: Understanding Curves that Minimize Distance on a Surface, Study notes of Mathematical Methods for Numerical Analysis and Optimization

The concept of geodesics on a surface, which are curves that minimize the distance between two points. The author derives the intrinsic formula for the christoffel symbols and discusses the frenet-serret apparatus of a curve on a surface. The document also proves the theorem that a curve is a geodesic if and only if it satisfies the geodesic differential equation.

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/04/2011

deville
deville 🇺🇸

4.7

(23)

390 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Geodesics and Length
Adrian Down
October 17, 2006
1 Review
Today we will finish our discussion of geodesics. We will prove an important
theorem which states that any curve that minimizes the distance between
two points on a surface is a geodesic.
1.1 Tangent vectors
Recall the previous formulae,
gij =hxi,xjiLij =hxij,niΓk
ij =X
l
gkl hxij ,xli
We derived an intrinsic formula for the Christoffel symbols Γ k
ij ,
Γk
ij =1
2X
l
gkl ∂gil
∂uj+gjl
∂uigij
∂ul
Note. By the way in which it is defined, the Christoffel symbols are invariant
under permutation of the lower indices,
Γk
ij = Γ k
ji
This symmetry can be used as an aid to remember the intrinsic formula for
Γk
ij above.
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Geodesics and Length: Understanding Curves that Minimize Distance on a Surface and more Study notes Mathematical Methods for Numerical Analysis and Optimization in PDF only on Docsity!

Geodesics and Length

Adrian Down

October 17, 2006

1 Review

Today we will finish our discussion of geodesics. We will prove an important

theorem which states that any curve that minimizes the distance between

two points on a surface is a geodesic.

1.1 Tangent vectors

Recall the previous formulae,

gij = 〈xi, xj 〉 Lij = 〈xij , n〉 Γ k ij =^

l

g kl 〈xij , xl〉

We derived an intrinsic formula for the Christoffel symbols Γ (^) ijk ,

k ij =

l

g kl

∂gil

∂uj^

∂gjl

∂ui^

∂gij

∂ul

Note. By the way in which it is defined, the Christoffel symbols are invariant

under permutation of the lower indices,

k ij = Γ^

k ji

This symmetry can be used as an aid to remember the intrinsic formula for

Γ (^) ijk above.

In general, the derivatives of the tangent vectors, xij , are neither normal

nor tangent to the surface. Gauss’s theorem shows that these vectors can be

decomposed into a component in the tangent plane and a component normal

to the surface,

xij = Lij n +

k

k ij xk

1.2 Curves on a surface

Previously, we discussed unit speed curves of the form

γ = x(γ 1 (s), γ 2 (s))

We can construct the Frenet-Serret apparatus of a curve on a surface as with

any other curve studied previously. From this Frenet-Serret apparatus, we

defined the particular vector S = n × T. With this definition, the second

derivative of the curve γ can be written in terms of a normal component and

a component in the direction of S. The coefficients of these components are

defined to be the normal and geodesic curvatures,

γ′′^ =

Lij

γi

γj^

κn

n +

γk

Γ (^) ijk (γi)′(γj^ )′

xk

︸ ︷︷ ︸ κg S

1.3 Geodesics

Geodesics are the analog of straight lines on an arbitrary surface. A curve γ

is a geodesic if κg ≡ 0 everywhere on the curve. Using Gauss’s formula above,

we saw that a curve γ is a geodesic if and only if γ satisfies the differential

equation,

( γ k)′′^

ijk

k ij (γ

i )

γ j )′^ = 0 k = 1, 2

The summation in these differential equations can be expanded,

( γ 1

1 11

γ 1

γ 1

1 12

γ 1

γ 2

1 22

γ 2

γ 2

γ 2

2 11

γ 1

γ 1

2 12

γ 1

γ 2

2 22

γ 2

γ 2

A solution to this differential equation is guaranteed by a basic existence

theorem for ordinary differential equations, which we will not pursue here.

The theorem states that we can uniquely solve this differential equation for

− < 0 <  for some  > 0.

Note. The previous theorem that we used required the Lipshitz condition

to be satisfied. In this case, there is no Lipshitz condition because we are

finding a solution only for a small time interval.

2.4 γ remains unit speed

Although we have claimed that we can solve the differential equation describ-

ing the geodesic, we must further ensure that the resulting curve remains unit

speed at all times. We will see that this fact is built in to the apparatus of

the curve.

Note. There is also a possibility that the quadratic term in the differential

equation could be problematic. Considering the simple differential equation

x˙ = x^2 with x(0) = x 0 > 0 shows that the solution to a quadratic differential

equation can diverge in finite time. Our solution will show that quadratic

terms are not problematic in this case.

To show that γ remains unit speed at all time, we need to prove that

|γ ′ (s) = 1| ∀ −  < s < 

If this can be shown, then γ(s) remains unit speed at all times.

We assume that the curve γ is unit speed at t = 0,

|γ ′ (0)| = |X| = 1

As per usual, to show that |γ′| = 1 at subsequent times, differentiate the

length of γ and show that it is equal to 0 to prove that the length of γ is

constant. To this end, define f (s) = |γ(s)|^2.

Note. When differentiating lengths, it is almost always preferable to differ-

entiate the length squared rather than the length itself.

f (s) can be written in component terms,

γ(s) = x

γ 1 (s), γ 2 (s)

γ ′ (s) =

γ i

xi

|γ ′ (s)| 2 = 〈γ ′ (s), γ ′ (s)〉 =

γ i

γ j

〈xi, xj 〉 ︸ ︷︷ ︸ gij

f (s) = |γ′(s)|^2 =

∑^2

ij

gij

γ^1 , γ^2

γi

γj^

We would like to show that f ′(s) = 0 for − < s < . Differentiating f (s)

componentwise and using the chain rule repeatedly,

f ′ (s) =

ijk

∂gij

∂uk

γ k

γ i

γ j

ij

gij

γ i

γ j

ij

gij

γ i

γ j

Although this equation appears formidable, it can be simplified using the

following identity,

∂gij

∂uk^

l

gilΓ l jk +^ gjkΓ^

l ik

We omit the proof of this identity. With this substitution, f ′(s) becomes,

f ′ (s) =

ijkl

gilΓ l jk

γ k

γ i

γ j

ijkl

gjkΓ l ik

γ k

γ i

γ j

ij

gij

γ i

γ j

ij

gij

γ i

γ j

Since summation indices are arbitrary, the indices in the last two summations

can be redefined to allow for combination with the first two summations

3.3 Create a family of variations

We will now create a family of curves with the same endpoints c and d as

γ in the neighborhood of s 0. Each of these variations has a different length

than initial curve, which we will see will be useful, since we are trying to

study the length of γ. To this end, define the quantity λ, which measure

the extent to which a variation deviates from the initial curve at a particular

value of s,

λ(s) ≡ (s − c)(d − s)κg(s)

Note. By definition, λ(c) = λ(d) = 0

We can write S = n × T in terms of components along a variation,

λ(s)S =

v i (s)xi

Note. As in the case of λ, v^1 (c) = v^2 (c) = v^1 (c) = v^2 (d) = 0.

For small t, define the curve,

α(s, t) = x

γ 1 (s) + tv 1 (s), γ 2 (s) + tv 2 (s)

3.4 Define the length of the variations

We can define the length from C = γ(c) and D = γ(d) along a particular

variation. The variation is parameterized by the variable t,

L(t) ≡

∫ (^) d

c

∂α

∂s

∂α

∂s

〉^1

2 ds

Note. Think of t as measuring the size of the perturbation of the variation

from the original curve γ. t = 0 corresponds to the original curve.

The key point is that L(0) ≤ L(t) for all small t, since the initial curve

γ(s) was assumed to be a curve of shortest length between C and D,

L(0) = length of α(s, 0) = γ(s) between C and D

Thus L(t) has a minimum at t = 0, meaning that L′(t) = 0 at t = 0. This

fact is very important, and contains all of the geometric information that we

would like to extract. We will use that fact that L ′ (0) = 0 to obtain the

desired result that κg(s) ≡ 0 for c < s < d.

3.5 Differentiate the length

To extract this geometric information, we must compute the value of the

derivative of L at t = 0,

d

dt

L(t) =

d

dt

∫ (^) d

c

∂α

∂s

∂α

∂s

〉^1

2 ds

∫ (^) d

c

d

dt

∂α

∂s

∂α

∂s

〉^1

2

ds

∫ (^) d

c

∂α ∂s ,^

∂α ∂s

2

∂^2 α

∂s∂t

∂α

∂s

∫ (^) d

c

∂^2 α ∂s∂t ,^

∂α ∂s

∂α ∂s ,^

∂α ∂s

〉^1

2

Now let t = 0. By definition, α(t = 0) = γ. γ is a unit speed curve, and so

the denominator of the above expression for L ′ (t) is equal to the length of

the tangent vector T, which is equal to 1. Thus,

dL(t)

dt

t=

∫ (^) d

c

∂^2 α

∂s∂t

∂α

∂s

t=

ds

In the next lecture, we will integrate this integrand by parts and relate the

resulting expression to the curvature.