


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The importance of the going concern assumption in ifrs standards and the disclosure requirements related to an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. With the economic impact of covid-19, assessing going concern has become more complex, and this document provides insights into the factors management should consider and the disclosures required. Ias 1's overarching disclosure requirements also play a role in identifying material disclosures.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



A fundamental decision management has to make in preparing financial statements applying IFRS Standards is whether to prepare them on a going concern basis. In the current stressed economic environment arising from the covid-19 pandemic, many entities have seen a significant downturn in their revenue, profitability and hence liquidity which may raise questions about their ability to continue as a going concern. For such entities deciding whether financial statements are required to be prepared on a going concern basis may therefore involve a greater degree of judgement than is usual. Most stakeholders are familiar with the specific discussion of going concern and related requirements in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements to disclose material uncertainties relating to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. However, questions raised about going concern in recent months have highlighted the relevance of other ‘overarching’ disclosure requirements in IAS 1 that interact with the specific going concern requirements. Considering this interaction is an important step in identifying material disclosures required by IFRS Standards; those disclosures are likely to be relevant for users of financial statements. One aspect of this interaction was highlighted in a 2014 Agenda Decision published by the IFRS Interpretations Committee. This document not only recaps the content of that agenda decision but also highlights other possible interactions that might be relevant.
When preparing financial statements, whether annual or interim, IAS 1 requires management to assess the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Standard defines going concern by explaining that financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Paragraph 26 of IAS 1 states that factors that management may need to consider when assessing whether the going concern basis of preparation is appropriate are those factors that relate to the entity’s current and expected profitability, the timing of repayment of existing financing facilities and potential sources of replacement financing. In the current stressed economic environment, an entity may be affected by a wider range of factors than in the past. IAS 1 requires management to take into account all available information about the future. Therefore, management may need to consider this wider range of factors before it can conclude whether preparing financial statements on a going concern basis is appropriate. For instance, among the factors management may need to consider are the effects of any temporary shut-down or curtailment of the entity’s activities, possible restrictions on activities that might be imposed by governments in the future, the continuing availability of any government support and the effects of longer-term structural changes in the market (such as changes in customer behaviour). When assessing whether to prepare financial statements on a going concern basis, IAS 1 requires management to look out at least 12 months from the end of the reporting period—but emphasises that the outlook is not limited to 12 months. Some national regulations require consideration of going concern for 12 months from the date that financial statements are authorised for issue. Considering time periods longer than 12 months is not inconsistent with the requirements in IAS 1, which establishes a minimum period, not a cap.
Circumstances affecting management’s assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern might change rapidly in the current environment. Paragraph 14 of IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period explains that management’s assessment of the use of a going concern basis of preparation needs to reflect the effect of events occurring after the end of the reporting period up to the date that the financial statements are authorised for issue. This might require management to update assessments of the going concern basis of preparation and decisions about which disclosures are necessary. If, before the financial statements are authorised for issue, circumstances were to deteriorate so that management no longer has any realistic alternative but to cease trading, the financial statements must not be prepared on a going concern basis.
Whether or not to prepare financial statements on a going concern basis is a binary decision, but the circumstances in which entities prepare financial statements on a going concern basis will vary widely. The circumstances could range from when an entity is profitable and has no liquidity concerns to when it is a ‘close call’ to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis, even after considering any mitigating actions planned by management. Management’s decision will be underpinned by assumptions and judgements that, in the current environment, may involve more uncertainty than in the past. It is important therefore that an entity considers not only the specific disclosure requirements relating to going concern in paragraph 25 of IAS 1 but also the overarching disclosure requirements in IAS 1. These requirements include those in paragraph 122 relating to judgements that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. In the current stressed economic environment, users of financial statements are more likely to focus on disclosures relating to going concern. Questions that users might ask could include how the assumptions management has used in reaching its conclusion about going concern relate to assumptions underpinning other aspects of the financial statements. Disclosure ... entity situation deteriorating ... Basis of preparation No specific disclosures Basis of preparation Significant judgements? Basis of preparation Material uncertainties Significant judgements? Limited specific requirements Scenario No significant doubts about going concern Significant doubts about going concern but mitigating actions judged sufficient to make going concern appropriate Entity determines no material uncertainties Significant doubts about going concern but mitigating actions judged sufficient to make going concern appropriate Material uncertainties about going concern remain after considering mitigating actions Intends to liquidate or to cease trading, or no realistic alternative but to do so Basis of preparation Going concern^ Alternate basis (not going concern)
The requirements in IAS 1 can be depicted as set out in the diagram below:
Consider Scenario 4 and an entity that is no longer a going concern. IAS 1 explains that the going concern basis of preparation is no longer appropriate when management either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. In such cases, if the entity prepares financial statements applying IFRS Standards, it does not prepare them on a going concern basis. IAS 1 does not specify an alternate basis for preparing financial statements if the entity is no longer a going concern. Paragraph 25 of IAS 1 requires the entity to disclose the fact that the financial statements have not been prepared on a going concern basis and the reasons why the entity is not regarded as a going concern, as well as disclosing the basis on which the financial statements have been prepared.
As outlined above, the overarching requirements in IFRS Standards already require entities to disclose information about significant judgments related to going concern assessments. However, given the heightened sensitivity in the current environment of going concern assessments and the importance of related disclosure, going concern has been a topic for discussion among accounting standard-setters. For instance, the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board has amended its standards, which are equivalent to IFRS Standards, to specify additional disclosure requirements relating to going concern. The new requirements draw on the overarching requirements in IAS 1 highlighted above—they explicitly require disclosure of information that would be expected to be provided as a result of considering those overarching requirements in the context of a going concern assessment. Going concern is also a topic under consideration by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). In September 2020, the IAASB published a Discussion Paper Fraud and Going Concern in an Audit of Financial Statements: Exploring the Differences Between Public Perceptions About the Role of the Auditor and the Auditor’s Responsibilities in a Financial Statement Audit , which is open for consultation until 1 February 2021, and held a related roundtable in September 2020. The Discussion Paper highlights the audit requirements and the requirements in IAS 1 when there are material uncertainties relating to going concern, and explains that the IAASB is interested in perspectives about whether the concept of, and requirements related to, a material uncertainty in the auditing standards is sufficiently aligned with the requirements in IFRS Standards. The topic of going concern has been identified as a potential agenda item to be covered in the IASB’s upcoming agenda consultation, for which it will be publishing a request for information in March 2021. In the meantime, it is important to remember what currently applicable IFRS Standards require in relation to going concern assessments—disclosures about not only material uncertainties but also significant judgements.