Heteroscedasticity : the econometric analysis, Slides of Econometrics and Mathematical Economics

Heteroscedasticity is a topic from Econometrics

Typology: Slides

2018/2019

Uploaded on 03/04/2019

abunayemsadi
abunayemsadi 🇧🇩

3 documents

1 / 29

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
HETEROSCEDASTICITY
The assumption of equal variance
Var(ui) = σ2, for all i, is called
homoscedasticity, which means
“equal scatter” (of the error terms
ui around their mean 0)
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d

Partial preview of the text

Download Heteroscedasticity : the econometric analysis and more Slides Econometrics and Mathematical Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

HETEROSCEDASTICITY

The assumption of equal variance

Var(u i

) = σ

2 , for all i, is called

homoscedasticity, which means

“equal scatter” (of the error terms

u i

around their mean 0)

 Consequences of ignoring

heteroscedasticity during the OLS

procedure

 The estimates and forecasts based on

them will still be unbiased and

consistent

 However, the OLS estimates are no

longer the best (B in BLUE) and thus

will be inefficient. Forecasts will also

be inefficient

Testing for heteroscedasticity

1. Before any formal tests,

visually examine the model’s

residuals û

i

Graph the û

i

or û

i

2

separately

against each explanatory

variable X

j

, or against Ŷ

i

, the

fitted values of the dependent

variable

Example of heteroscedasticity

0

1

2

3

0 20 40 60

Income (X) ordered by size

Residuals

Series

Step 3. Calculate the ratio

F = RSS

2

/RSS

1

, which has an F

distribution with

d.f. = [n – d – 2(k+1)]/2 both in the

numerator and the denominator,

where n is the total # of

observations, d is the # of omitted

observations, and k is the # of

explanatory variables.

  • (^) Step4. Reject H 0

: All the variances

σ i

2 are equal (i.e., homoscedastic) if

F > F

cr

, where F cr

is found in the

table of the F distribution for

[n-d-2(k+1)]/2 d.f. and for a

predetermined level of significance

α, typically 5%.

  1. Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests

(for large n>30)

 The Breusch-Pagan test

Step 1. Run the regression of û i

2

on all the explanatory variables. In

our example (CN p. 37), there is

only one explanatory variable, X 1

,

therefore the model for the OLS

estimation has the form:

û i

2 = α 0

  • α 1

X 1i

  • v i

Step 2. Keep the R

2 from this

regression. Let’s call it R û

2

Calculate either

(a) F = (R û

2 /k)/[(1-R û

2 )/(n-(k+1)],

where k is the # of explanatory

variables; the F statistic has an F

distribution with d.f. = [k, n-(k+1)]

Reject H 0

: All the variances σ i

2 are

equal (i.e., homoscedastic) if F >F cr

 Drawbacks of the Breusch-

Pagan test

It has been shown to be

sensitive to any violation of the

normality assumption

 Three other popular LM tests: the

Glejser test; the Harvey-Godfrey

test, and the Park test, are also

sensitive to such violations (won’t

be covered in this course)

One LM test, the White

test, does not depend

on the normality

assumption; therefore

it is recommended

over all the other tests

Step 2. Compute the statistic

χ

2 = nR û

2 , where n is the sample size

and R û

2 is the unadjusted R-squared

from the OLS regression in Step 1. The

statistic χ

2 = nR û

2 , has an asymptotic

chi-square (χ

2 ) distrib. with d.f. = k,

where k is the # of ALL explanatory

variables in the AUXILIARY model.

Reject H 0

: All the variances σ i

2 are

equal (i.e., homoscedastic) if χ

2

χ cr

2

 Estimation Procedures when H 0

is

rejected

  • (^) 1. Heteroscedasticity with a known

proportional factor

 If it can be assumed that the error variance is

proportional to the square of the indep. variable

X j

2 , we can correct for heteroscedasticity by

dividing every term of the regression by X 1i

and

then reestimating the model using the transformed

variables. In the two-variable case, we will have to

reestimate the following model (CN, p. 39):

Y i

/X 1i

= β 0

/X 1i

  • β 1

  • u i

/X 1i