Higher Algebra 7, Exercises - Mathematics, Exercises of Algebra

commutative,commutative k-algebra ,Linear algebra over skew fields, linear algebra, K-vector subspace, K-module homomorphism, vector space, A p-adic analogue of the Hamilton quaternions,quadratic nonresidue, isomorphism, p-adic numbers.

Typology: Exercises

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/11/2011

jamal33
jamal33 🇺🇸

4.3

(51)

340 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 250: Higher Algebra
Problem Set #7 (12 November 2004):
Simple algebras, etc.
1. i) Fix a (commutative) field k. Is the (commutative, infinite-dimensional) algebra k[X], consid-
ered as a module over itself, semisimple?
ii) Now assume that kis not of characteristic 2. For each ck, let Acbe the (two-dimensional,
commutative) k-algebra k[X]/(X2c). Prove that Ac, considered as a module over itself, is
simple unless cis a square in k, and semisimple unless c= 0.
iii) More generally, for any nonconstant polynomial fk[X], when is the commutative k-algebra
k[X]/(f) simple or semisimple as a module over itself?
2. Prove that if Mis a semisimple R-module then so is any submodule and any quotient module
of M. Give an example of a ring Rwith a module Mand a submodule M0such that M0and
M/M0are both semisimple but Mis not. [Hint: we’ve seen only a few examples of modules
that are not semisimple. . . ]
Linear algebra over skew fields. In our noncommutative setting, all modules, ideals, etc. will
be left modules/ideals/. .. unless otherwise specified. A module over a skew field Kis also called a
“vector space” over K. This generalizes the notion of a vector space over a commutative field. We
can use our generalities about semisimple modules to extend the basic notions of linear algebra to
this setting.
3. i) Show that any skew field K, considered as a left K-module, is simple, and that every simple
K-module is isomorphic to K.
Let Vbe a finitely generated1K-module, with generators v1, . . . , vn. We may assume that each
vi6= 0. Then Vis the sum of the simple modules Kvi, and is thus semisimple. Therefore it is the
direct sum of Kvjwith jrunning over some subset J {1,2, . . . , n}. If V=jJKvj, we say that
{vj:jJ}is a basis for V. Note that Vis isomorphic as a K-module to Km, where m= #(J)n.
If WVis any K-submodule (also called “[K-vector] subspace”), then V=WW0for some
subspace W0V, and W0can be chosen to be the direct sum of Kvjwith jrunning over some
subset of J. In particular, if {vj}is a basis of V, and {ui}is any independent subset (that is, a
subset such that the sum of Kuiin Vis direct), then {ui}can be completed to a basis.
ii) Prove that every linearly independent subset of Knhas cardinality at most n, and is a basis if
and only if its cardinality is exactly n.
Thus the basis cardinality is an invariant of finitely generated K-vector spaces. Naturally we call
this invariant the dimension of the space, and denote it by dimK.
iii) Let Vbe a K-vector space of finite dimension n, and TaK-linear map (that is, a K-module
homomorphism) from Vto some other K-vector space W. Prove that the dimensions of the
image and kernel of Tsum to n.
1We can extend the results of Problem 3 to arbitrary K-modules if we assume AC/Zorn.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Higher Algebra 7, Exercises - Mathematics and more Exercises Algebra in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 250: Higher Algebra Problem Set #7 (12 November 2004): Simple algebras, etc.

  1. i) Fix a (commutative) field k. Is the (commutative, infinite-dimensional) algebra k[X], consid- ered as a module over itself, semisimple? ii) Now assume that k is not of characteristic 2. For each c ∈ k, let Ac be the (two-dimensional, commutative) k-algebra k[X]/(X^2 − c). Prove that Ac, considered as a module over itself, is simple unless c is a square in k, and semisimple unless c = 0. iii) More generally, for any nonconstant polynomial f ∈ k[X], when is the commutative k-algebra k[X]/(f ) simple or semisimple as a module over itself?
  2. Prove that if M is a semisimple R-module then so is any submodule and any quotient module of M. Give an example of a ring R with a module M and a submodule M 0 such that M 0 and M/M 0 are both semisimple but M is not. [Hint: we’ve seen only a few examples of modules that are not semisimple... ]

Linear algebra over skew fields. In our noncommutative setting, all modules, ideals, etc. will be left modules/ideals/... unless otherwise specified. A module over a skew field K is also called a “vector space” over K. This generalizes the notion of a vector space over a commutative field. We can use our generalities about semisimple modules to extend the basic notions of linear algebra to this setting.

  1. i) Show that any skew field K, considered as a left K-module, is simple, and that every simple K-module is isomorphic to K.

Let V be a finitely generated^1 K-module, with generators v 1 ,... , vn. We may assume that each vi 6 = 0. Then V is the sum of the simple modules Kvi, and is thus semisimple. Therefore it is the direct sum of Kvj with j running over some subset J ⊆ { 1 , 2 ,... , n}. If V = ⊕j∈J Kvj , we say that {vj : j ∈ J} is a basis for V. Note that V is isomorphic as a K-module to Km, where m = #(J) ≤ n. If W ⊆ V is any K-submodule (also called “[K-vector] subspace”), then V = W ⊕ W ′^ for some subspace W ′^ ⊆ V , and W ′^ can be chosen to be the direct sum of Kvj with j running over some subset of J. In particular, if {vj } is a basis of V , and {ui} is any independent subset (that is, a subset such that the sum of Kui in V is direct), then {ui} can be completed to a basis.

ii) Prove that every linearly independent subset of Kn^ has cardinality at most n, and is a basis if and only if its cardinality is exactly n.

Thus the basis cardinality is an invariant of finitely generated K-vector spaces. Naturally we call this invariant the dimension of the space, and denote it by dimK.

iii) Let V be a K-vector space of finite dimension n, and T a K-linear map (that is, a K-module homomorphism) from V to some other K-vector space W. Prove that the dimensions of the image and kernel of T sum to n. (^1) We can extend the results of Problem 3 to arbitrary K-modules if we assume AC/Zorn.

We can also generalize duality of vector spaces to this non-commutative setting, provided we keep our directions straight:

  1. Let K be a skew field, and Ko^ its opposite. For any K-vector space V , let V ∗^ be its dual space, consisting of K-linear maps to K. Show that V ∗^ has the structure of a Ko-vector space, and that if V has dimension n < ∞ then V ∗^ is also n-dimensional as a Ko-vector space. Show further that, for any subspace W ⊆ V , its annihilator {v∗^ ∈ V ∗^ : ∀w ∈ W, v∗(w) = 0} is a Ko-subspace of V ∗^ of dimension dimK V − dimK W.
  2. Let K be a skew field, V a finite-dimensional vector space over K, and A its algebra of K-endomorphisms, isomorphic with the algebra of n × n matrices with entries in K. Show that for any W ⊆ V the annihilator of W in A is a left ideal of A, and that two such ideals are isomorphic as representations of A if and only if they come from W ’s of the same dimension. (In particular, this proves and extends our claims about minimal left ideals, which come from W ’s of dimension (dimK V ) − 1.) Show that every ideal of A is the annihilator of some W.

[You might first review how to do these problems in the familiar setting of vector spaces of com- mutative fields, and then extend to the noncommutative case. For the last part of Problem 5, you might begin from a recipe for recovering W from its annihilator, and then apply the recipe to an arbitrary left ideal. What are the right ideals of A?]

A p-adic analogue of the Hamilton quaternions. For each odd prime p we shall construct a 4-dimensional algebra Hp over the field Qp of p-adic numbers, and prove properties analogous to those of the Hamilton quaternions over R.

  1. Fix an odd prime p, and a “quadratic nonresidue” s; that is, s is an integer not congruent mod p to m^2 for any m ∈ Z. Let Hp be the Qp algebra with generators 1, i, j, k with the following multiplication table: 1 i j k 1 1 i j k i i s k sj j j −k p −pi k k −sj pi −sp For instance, ij = k. Define an involution x ↔ ¯x on Hp by ¯x = 2a−x where x = a+bi+cj+dk. The (reduced) norm N : Hp → Qp is defined by

N (x) = xx¯ = ¯xx = a^2 − sb^2 − pc^2 + spd^2.

i) Verify that Hp is associative. ii) Verify that x ↔ ¯x is an isomorphism from Hp to its opposite algebra Hop. (Such a map is called an “anti-isomorphism” of Hp, and an “anti-involution” if, as here, it is its own inverse.) Use this to show that the norm map is multiplicative: N (xy) = N (x)N (y) for all x, y ∈ Hp. iii) Show that N (x) = 0 if and only if x = 0, and conclude that Hp is a skew field.

[If you’re not used to working with p-adic numbers, you can interpret the first part of (iii) as “show that a^2 − sb^2 − pc^2 + spd^2 = 0 has no nonzero rational solutions (a, b, c, d) ∈ Q^4 using only congruences modulo powers of p”.]

Problem set is due in class Monday, November the 22nd.