Homework 1 Problems for Current Problems in Architecture | ANTH 206, Assignments of Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

Material Type: Assignment; Class: CUR PROBS IN ARCH; Subject: Anthropology; University: University of California - Santa Barbara; Term: Spring 1995;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/30/2009

koofers-user-h05
koofers-user-h05 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ESM 206 Problem set 1
1) The Norwegian Lakes dataset on the class website (NorwegianLakes.csv) contains
measurements from 42 lakes, including pH in 1976 and 1981, and estimates of SO4 and
NO3 deposition in 1981. Which variables (if any) appear to be approximately normally
distributed? For those that are not, what transformation might make them more normal?
For each of questions 2-5, (a) state the appropriate null and alternate hypotheses in
words; (b) state which statistical procedure should be used to test the null hypothesis; (c)
run the test; (d) write a short statement giving your conclusion in words and the
supporting statistical information.
2) You are concerned about possible sulfate contamination of groundwater from an
industrial facility. You have data from two wells: one is away from the facility and is
thought to represent background levels in the region; the other is downgradient from the
facility. Here are the data:
Year Month Sulfate concentration (ppm)
Background Downgradient
1995 Jan 560
Apr 530
Jul 570 600
Oct 490 590
1996 Jan 510 590
Apr 550 630
Jul 550 610
Oct 530 630
Test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether the downgradient site suffers from
sulfate contamination.
3) The file npp.xls on the course website contains data on net primary productivity (NPP)
collected from ecosystems around the world (this is actually a subset of a larger dataset
that can be found in Esser et al. 2000). Test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether
total NPP (column “TNPP”) differs among ecosystems with different vegetation types
(column “Vegetation type”).
4) A species of marine arthropod lives in seawater that contains calcium in a
concentration of 30 mmole/kg of water. Thirteen of the animals are collected and the
calcium concentrations in their coelomic fluid are found to be: 28, 27, 29, 29, 30, 30, 31,
30, 33, 27, 30, 32, and 31 mmole/kg. Test the appropriate hypothesis to conclude
whether members of this species maintain a coelomic calcium concentration less than that
of their environment.
5) In the Norwegian Lakes data, test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether the
lakes became more acidic between 1976 and 1981.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Homework 1 Problems for Current Problems in Architecture | ANTH 206 and more Assignments Introduction to Cultural Anthropology in PDF only on Docsity!

ESM 206 Problem set 1

  1. The Norwegian Lakes dataset on the class website (NorwegianLakes.csv) contains measurements from 42 lakes, including pH in 1976 and 1981, and estimates of SO4 and NO3 deposition in 1981. Which variables (if any) appear to be approximately normally distributed? For those that are not, what transformation might make them more normal? For each of questions 2-5, (a) state the appropriate null and alternate hypotheses in words; (b) state which statistical procedure should be used to test the null hypothesis; (c) run the test; (d) write a short statement giving your conclusion in words and the supporting statistical information.
  2. You are concerned about possible sulfate contamination of groundwater from an industrial facility. You have data from two wells: one is away from the facility and is thought to represent background levels in the region; the other is downgradient from the facility. Here are the data: Year Month Sulfate concentration (ppm) Background Downgradient 1995 Jan 560 Apr 530 Jul 570 600 Oct 490 590 1996 Jan 510 590 Apr 550 630 Jul 550 610 Oct 530 630 Test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether the downgradient site suffers from sulfate contamination.
  3. The file npp.xls on the course website contains data on net primary productivity (NPP) collected from ecosystems around the world (this is actually a subset of a larger dataset that can be found in Esser et al. 2000). Test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether total NPP (column “TNPP”) differs among ecosystems with different vegetation types (column “Vegetation type”).
  4. A species of marine arthropod lives in seawater that contains calcium in a concentration of 30 mmole/kg of water. Thirteen of the animals are collected and the calcium concentrations in their coelomic fluid are found to be: 28, 27, 29, 29, 30, 30, 31, 30, 33, 27, 30, 32, and 31 mmole/kg. Test the appropriate hypothesis to conclude whether members of this species maintain a coelomic calcium concentration less than that of their environment.
  5. In the Norwegian Lakes data, test the appropriate hypothesis to decide whether the lakes became more acidic between 1976 and 1981.
  1. Using the data from question 3, suppose that the population mean of the coelomic fluid calcium concentration was the same as the value you estimated from your sample. Given the variability among observations that you see in the existing data, how many animals would need to be sampled in order that there will be a 90% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis with an alpha of 0.05?
  2. For ESM 201 you read a 1999 paper by Hatch et al. on the effects of burning and grazing on a grassland, which is at http://www2.bren.ucsb.edu/~fd/courses/esm201/secure/hatch-et-al-restorecol.pdf (for those of you not in the class: the login is esm201 and the password is ecology). a) Describe, in your own words, the independent and dependent variables of the analysis. As best you can from the paper, determine what sorts of measurements these variables are based on, and how the values were constructed. Should they be treated as continuous, categorical, or ordinal variables? b) What statistical procedure did the author use to conduct the analysis? Is this how you would have done it? If not, describe how you would have constructed the analysis differently. c) What parts of the data description or analysis did you not understand? What additional information would you have needed to be provided that would aid your understanding? Are you confident that the assumptions of the analysis are met? Might this additional information change your answers to a and b above? Might it change your level of confidence in the results presented by the author?
  3. For the analysis that you performed in question 5, are the assumptions likely to be violated? Do a bootstrap analysis to relax these assumptions. Do your conclusions change? References Esser, G., H. F. H. Lieth, J. M. O. Scurlock, and R. J. Olson. 2000. Osnabrück net primary productivity data set. Ecology 81 :1177. Ecological Archives E081-011.