Homework 4 Solutions - Solid-State Optics | OPTI 507, Assignments of Chemistry

Assignment 5 for OPTI 507 with Professor Peyghambarian at UA Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Peyghambarian; Class: Solid-State Optics; Subject: OPTICAL SCIENCES; University: University of Arizona; Term: Fall 2004;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/30/2009

koofers-user-mu4
koofers-user-mu4 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
OPTI 507 - Solid-State Optics
HW 4 Solutions
Jason M. Auxier
Copyright c
°2004
All rights reserved.
September 15, 2004
Homework 4 consists of problems 3.2 - 3.5 in the text: Introduction to Semi-
conductor Optics by Peyghambarian et al [1].
1 Problem 3.2 - 10 Points
Prove Eq. (3.61).
1.1 Solution
Consider a prism with index n > 1. Looking at Fig. 1, we see that the input
beam is headed to the normal of the output face. Let γ0=π/2γ, where γis
the incident angle. By Snell’s law,
Figure 1: The geometry of the prism along with the angle definitions.
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Homework 4 Solutions - Solid-State Optics | OPTI 507 and more Assignments Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

OPTI 507 - Solid-State Optics

HW 4 Solutions

Jason M. Auxier

Copyright ©c 2004

All rights reserved.

September 15, 2004

Homework 4 consists of problems 3.2 - 3.5 in the text: Introduction to Semi- conductor Optics by Peyghambarian et al [1].

1 Problem 3.2 - 10 Points

Prove Eq. (3.61).

1.1 Solution

Consider a prism with index n > 1. Looking at Fig. 1, we see that the input beam is headed to the normal of the output face. Let γ′^ = π/ 2 − γ, where γ is the incident angle. By Snell’s law,

Figure 1: The geometry of the prism along with the angle definitions.

Homework 4 Solutions 2

sin γ = n sin θ 1 n sin θ 2 = sin δ

Note that γ′^ + θ 1 + θ 2 = π/2, so

γ = θ 1 + θ 2 (2)

Thus, using a trig identity, we can write

sin γ = cos θ 1 sin θ 2 + sin θ 1 cos θ 2. (3)

Also,

cos θ 2 = sin(γ′^ + θ 1 ) = cos γ′^ sin θ 1 + sin γ′^ cos θ 1 = sin γ sin θ 1 + cos γ cos θ 1.

Now, using Eq. 4, sin θ 1 = sinn^ γ, sin θ 2 = sinn^ δ, and cos α =

1 − sin^2 α, we can write Eq. 3 as

sin γ =

n

sin δ n

(sin δ + sin γ cos γ) +

n^2

sin^3 γ. (5)

Multiplying both sides of this equation by n^2 and bringing sin^3 γ to the LHS, we have sin γ

n^2 − sin^2 γ

n^2 − sin^2 δ (sin δ + sin γ cos γ). (6)

Squaring both sides, bringing everything to the LHS, and factoring, we can write

( n^2 − sin^2 γ

n^2 sin^2 δ − sin^4 δ − sin^2 δ − 2 sin δ sin γ cos γ − sin^2 γ cos^2 γ

Now, n = ± sin γ is nonphysical, so the second term must vanish:

n^2 =

sin^2 δ

1 − cos^2 δ

  • sin^2 δ + 2 sin δ sin γ cos γ + sin^2 γ cos^2 γ sin^2 γ

= 1 +

2 cos γ sin δ sin γ

sin^2 δ sin^2 γ

2 Problem 3.3 - 10 Points

Show that the reflectivity of a material with negative dielectric function ap- proaches unity.

Homework 4 Solutions 4

So, differentiating and dividing the common exponentials from both sides,

(+α 1 E, 0 , ikxE) = iξ c

(Hx, 0 , H 1 z ) for z > 0

(−α 2 E, 0 , ikxE) =

iξ c

(Hx, 0 , H 2 z ) for z < 0.

Matching these equations up at the boundary z = 0, from the x-component we find that α 1 = −α 2. (15)

Since absorption is positive or zero, this could only be satisfied if α 1 = α 2 = 0. This is not true for metals. Strictly speaking we are offering a proof by contradiction. Formally, we make the statement that for a metal, α 2 6 = 0 and assume that a TE mode exists. This assumption lead to a violation of α 2 6 = 0. So, by contradiction, metals cannot support a TE mode.

4 Problem 3.5 - 10 Points

When a very intense laser irradiates a metal, it ablates material near the surface, resulting in a gas of ionized particles (a plasma) expanding into free space. At which densities of the plasma will light with λ = 1μm be totally reflected?

4.1 Solution

Reflection occurs when the optical frequency is below the plasma frequency ωp.

ω^2 p =

4 πne^2 ≤∞me

Now, we want ω < ωp, so

ω^2 <

4 πne^2 ≤∞me

n >

ω^2 ≤∞me 4 πe^2

Also, ν = (^) λc , so ω = 2 πcλ. Therefore,

n >

2 πc λ

≤∞me 4 πe^2

πmec^2 e^2 λ^2

for ≤∞ ' 1.

REFERENCES 5

Remember that this is in Gaussian (cgs) units, so

1C = 3 × 109 esu e = 4. 81 × 10 −^10 esu me = 9. 11 × 10 −^28 g λ = 10−^4 cm c = 2. 9979 × 1010 cm/s.

Therefore,

n > 1 × 1021

e− cm^3

References

[1] Nasser N. Peyghambarian, Stephan W. Koch, and Andre Mysyrowicz. In- troduction to Semiconductor Optics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,