Math 6010 Fall 2004 HW4: Uniqueness of Minimum & Variance Calculation in Linear Regression, Assignments of Mathematics

Solutions to problem number 1 and 2 from homework 4 of math 6010, fall 2004. Problem 1 deals with the uniqueness of the minimum of a function, while problem 2 focuses on calculating the variance of the least-squares predictor in a multiple linear regression model. The document also discusses the impact of adding new variables on the variance.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/31/2009

koofers-user-goq
koofers-user-goq 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 6010, Fall 2004: Homework
Homework 4
#1, page 136: As in the hint let Ii=1 if Eiis incorrect; else, let Ii=0. Then
iIidenotes the number of incorrect statements, and E[iIi] = iE[Ii] =
iP(Ei) = iαiis the corresponding expectation.
#2, page 136: Fix k>1, and define
f(α) = 1α
kk(1α)0α1.
Evidently,
f0(α) = 11α
kk1
>0,
for all α>0. This proves that the minimum of foccurs uniquely at α=0;
i.e., f(α)>f(0), which is the desired result.
#4, page 136: A solution will be posted soon.
#5, page 136: Every time we add a new variable we increase the variance
(§5.4). Here, however, is a direct argument: Suppose we have the new
model,
G:Y=Xβ+Zγ+ε=Wδ+ε,
where W= (X,Z)columnwise, and δ= (β0,γ0)0. The least-squares pre-
dictor, under G, is
ˆ
δG= (W0W)1W0Y.
Thus, the new predictor at (x0
0,γ0
0)0is:
ˆ
Y0G=x0
0,γ0
00ˆ
δG.
By Theorem 3.6(iv) (p. 55),
Varˆ
δG=(X0X)1+LM L0L M0
M L0M,
where L= (X0X)1X0Z,M= (Z0R Z)1, and R=InW(W0W)1W0.
Therefore,
Varˆ
Y0G=x0
0,γ0
00Varˆ
δGx0
0,γ0
0
=σ2x0
0X0X1x0+x0
0LM L0x0γ0
0M L0x0x0
0LM 0γ0+γ00Mγ0
=σ2x0
0X0X1x0+x0
0LM L0x02γ0
0M L0x0+γ00Mγ0
=σ2x0
0X0X1x0+L0x0γ00ML0x0γ0
σ2x0
0X0X1x0,
as long as Mis positive definite. It remains to prove that Mis p.d. We can
note that M1is positive definite, because w0M w =kRZw k2for all w.
(This uses R0R=R.) Therefore, M1has all strictly positive eigenvalues,
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Math 6010 Fall 2004 HW4: Uniqueness of Minimum & Variance Calculation in Linear Regression and more Assignments Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 6010, Fall 2004: Homework

Homework 4

#1, page 136: As in the hint let Ii = 1 if Ei is incorrect; else, let Ii = 0. Then

∑i Ii denotes the number of incorrect statements, and^ E[∑i Ii] =^ ∑i E[Ii] = ∑i P(Ei) =^ ∑i α i is the corresponding expectation.

#2, page 136: Fix k > 1, and define

f ( α ) =

α

k

)k − ( 1 − α ) 0 ≤ α ≤ 1.

Evidently,

f ′ ( α ) = 1 −

α

k

)k− 1

0,

for all α > 0. This proves that the minimum of f occurs uniquely at α = 0; i.e., f ( α ) > f ( 0 ), which is the desired result.

#4, page 136: A solution will be posted soon.

#5, page 136: Every time we add a new variable we increase the variance (§5.4). Here, however, is a direct argument: Suppose we have the new model,

G : Y = X β + Z γ + ε = W δ + ε ,

where W = ( X , Z ) columnwise, and δ = ( β ′ , γ ′ ) ′

. The least-squares pre- dictor, under G, is

δ ˆ G = ( W^

W )

− 1 W

Y.

Thus, the new predictor at ( x ′ 0 , γ ′ 0 )′^ is:

0 G =^

x ′ 0 ,^ γ

′ 0

δ ˆ G.

By Theorem 3.6(iv) (p. 55),

Var

δ ˆ G

( X

X )

− 1

  • LML ′ − LM

MLM

where L = ( XX )−^1 XZ , M = ( ZRZ )−^1 , and R = I n − W ( WW )−^1 W ′ . Therefore,

Var

[

0 G

]

x ′ 0 ,^ γ

′ 0

Var

δ ˆ G

x ′ 0 ,^ γ

′ 0

= σ 2

x ′ 0

X

X

x 0 + x ′ 0 LML

x 0 − γ ′ 0 ML

x 0 − x ′ 0 LM

γ 0 + γ 0M γ 0

= σ 2

x ′ 0

X

X

x 0 + x ′ 0 LML

x 0 − 2 γ ′ 0 ML

x 0 + γ 0M γ 0

= σ 2

x ′ 0

X

X

x 0 +

[

L

x 0 − γ 0

]′

M

[

L

x 0 − γ 0

])

σ 2 x ′ 0

X

X

x 0 ,

as long as M is positive definite. It remains to prove that M is p.d. We can

note that M − 1 is positive definite, because wMw = ‖ RZw ‖ 2 for all w.

(This uses RR = R .) Therefore, M − 1 has all strictly positive eigenvalues, 1

2

which means that the same is true for M. This proves that M is p.d. and the result follows.

#6, page 136: Let a = (a 0 , a 1 )′; we are to find simultaneous 100( 1 − α )%-CI’s for all linear combinations a ′^ β. An answer is,

a

β ±

2 S^2 a ′^ ( XX )

− 1 a F2,n− 2 ( α ).

But here, ( XX

ns^2 x

x^2 − x¯ − x¯ 1

Therefore,

a

X

X

a =

ns^2 x

a 2 0 x

(^2) − 2 a 0 a 1 x¯^ +^ a

2 1

#5, page 196: Recall that H 0 : μ 1 = · · · = μ p, which imposes q = p − 1 linear restrictions. In class we proved that

RSSH 0 − RSS =

p

i= 1

Ji

i· −^

··

p

i= 1

Ji

j= 1

i· −^

··

Therefore, by Theorem 4.1(ii) (p. 100),

E

[

p

i= 1

Ji

j= 1

i· −^

Y¯··

]

= σ 2 (p − 1 ) +

RSSH 0 − RSS

Y =E[ Y ]

= σ

2 (p − 1 ) +

p

i= 1

Ji

j= 1

μ i −

p

p

i= 1

Ji μ i

This answers (a). For (b), note that

E

[

n

i= 1

Ji

j= 1

Yij − Y¯i·

]

n

i= 1

Ji

j= 1

E

[(

Yij − Y¯i·

) 2 ]

n

i= 1

Ji E

[(

Yi 1 − Y¯i·

) 2 ]

(why?)

n

i= 1

Ji

σ 2

Ji − 1

= σ 2

n

i= 1

Ji

Ji − 1