

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Solutions to problem number 1 and 2 from homework 4 of math 6010, fall 2004. Problem 1 deals with the uniqueness of the minimum of a function, while problem 2 focuses on calculating the variance of the least-squares predictor in a multiple linear regression model. The document also discusses the impact of adding new variables on the variance.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Homework 4
#1, page 136: As in the hint let Ii = 1 if Ei is incorrect; else, let Ii = 0. Then
∑i Ii denotes the number of incorrect statements, and^ E[∑i Ii] =^ ∑i E[Ii] = ∑i P(Ei) =^ ∑i α i is the corresponding expectation.
#2, page 136: Fix k > 1, and define
f ( α ) =
α
k
)k − ( 1 − α ) 0 ≤ α ≤ 1.
Evidently,
f ′ ( α ) = 1 −
α
k
)k− 1
0,
for all α > 0. This proves that the minimum of f occurs uniquely at α = 0; i.e., f ( α ) > f ( 0 ), which is the desired result.
#4, page 136: A solution will be posted soon.
#5, page 136: Every time we add a new variable we increase the variance (§5.4). Here, however, is a direct argument: Suppose we have the new model,
G : Y = X β + Z γ + ε = W δ + ε ,
where W = ( X , Z ) columnwise, and δ = ( β ′ , γ ′ ) ′
. The least-squares pre- dictor, under G, is
δ ˆ G = ( W^
′ W )
− 1 W
′ Y.
Thus, the new predictor at ( x ′ 0 , γ ′ 0 )′^ is:
x ′ 0 ,^ γ
′ 0
δ ˆ G.
By Theorem 3.6(iv) (p. 55),
Var
δ ˆ G
′ X )
− 1
− ML ′ M
where L = ( X ′ X )−^1 X ′ Z , M = ( Z ′ RZ )−^1 , and R = I n − W ( W ′ W )−^1 W ′ . Therefore,
Var
0 G
x ′ 0 ,^ γ
′ 0
Var
δ ˆ G
x ′ 0 ,^ γ
′ 0
= σ 2
x ′ 0
′ X
x 0 + x ′ 0 LML
′ x 0 − γ ′ 0 ML
′ x 0 − x ′ 0 LM
′ γ 0 + γ 0 ′ M γ 0
= σ 2
x ′ 0
′ X
x 0 + x ′ 0 LML
′ x 0 − 2 γ ′ 0 ML
′ x 0 + γ 0 ′ M γ 0
= σ 2
x ′ 0
′ X
x 0 +
′ x 0 − γ 0
′ x 0 − γ 0
≥ σ 2 x ′ 0
′ X
x 0 ,
as long as M is positive definite. It remains to prove that M is p.d. We can
note that M − 1 is positive definite, because w ′ Mw = ‖ RZw ‖ 2 for all w.
(This uses R ′ R = R .) Therefore, M − 1 has all strictly positive eigenvalues, 1
2
which means that the same is true for M. This proves that M is p.d. and the result follows.
#6, page 136: Let a = (a 0 , a 1 )′; we are to find simultaneous 100( 1 − α )%-CI’s for all linear combinations a ′^ β. An answer is,
a
β ±
2 S^2 a ′^ ( X ′ X )
− 1 a F2,n− 2 ( α ).
But here, ( X ′ X
ns^2 x
x^2 − x¯ − x¯ 1
Therefore,
a ′
′ X
a =
ns^2 x
a 2 0 x
(^2) − 2 a 0 a 1 x¯^ +^ a
2 1
#5, page 196: Recall that H 0 : μ 1 = · · · = μ p, which imposes q = p − 1 linear restrictions. In class we proved that
p
i= 1
Ji
i· −^
··
p
i= 1
Ji
j= 1
i· −^
··
Therefore, by Theorem 4.1(ii) (p. 100),
p
i= 1
Ji
j= 1
i· −^
= σ 2 (p − 1 ) +
Y =E[ Y ]
= σ
2 (p − 1 ) +
p
i= 1
Ji
j= 1
μ i −
p
p
i= 1
Ji μ i
This answers (a). For (b), note that
n
i= 1
Ji
j= 1
Yij − Y¯i·
n
i= 1
Ji
j= 1
Yij − Y¯i·
n
i= 1
Ji E
Yi 1 − Y¯i·
(why?)
n
i= 1
Ji
σ 2
Ji − 1
= σ 2
n
i= 1
Ji
Ji − 1