Hospital Management Systems: A Comprehensive Overview, Thesis of Software Engineering

fhdgjjfffffjbnbbbbbbbbbbmmkjkgg

Typology: Thesis

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/14/2023

abbaseid21
abbaseid21 🇪🇹

1 document

1 / 53

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Kombollcha Institute of
Technology
College of Informatics
Department of Software Engineering
We here by Submitted a project in Hospital Management System for
Patients in partial fulfillment of bachelor’s Degree in Software
Engineering
Submitted to the departments of Software Engineering
Group Members:
No.Name ID Number
1. Bizualem Abebe
2. Abdurehma Sualih
3. Dawit Bekele 2155/14
Advisor’s Name: Sir. Leul Aynekulu (Msc.)
Signature:
20/03/2023
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35

Partial preview of the text

Download Hospital Management Systems: A Comprehensive Overview and more Thesis Software Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

Kombollcha Institute of

Technology

College of Informatics

Department of Software Engineering

We here by Submitted a project in Hospital Management System for

Patients in partial fulfillment of bachelor’s Degree in Software

Engineering

Submitted to the departments of Software Engineering

Group Members: No. Name ID Number

**1. Bizualem Abebe

  1. Abdurehma Sualih
  2. Dawit Bekele 2155/ Advisor’s Name: Sir. Leul Aynekulu (Msc.) Signature: 20 / 03 / 2023**

Discriminary

We hereby declare that our project in titled Hospital Management System for

Patients is original and not submitted/Published by any individual/ Organization.

Group members S.N. Name List ID Number sign:

  1. Bizualem Abebe
  2. Abdurehma Sualih
  3. Dawit Bekele 2155/ Advisor’s Name: Date: ---------/----/2022 Sign:

Catalog

  • Chapter
    • Overall Description
    • 1.1. Introduction
    • 1.1.1 Background of the organization
    • 1.1.2 The Existing System
    • 1.1.3 Statement of The Problem
    • 1.1.4 Proposed System
    • 1.2 Objective
    • 1.2.1 General Objective
    • 1.2.2 Specific Objective
    • 1.3 Scope and Limitation of the Project
    • 1.4 Methodology for the project
    • 1.4.1 Data collection and fact-finding techniques
    • 1.4.2 System Analysis and Design Approach
    • 1.4.3 Technology Requirements
    • 1.5 Feasibility Study
      1. Technical Feasibility:
      1. Operational Feasibility:
      1. Economic Feasibility:
      1. Legal Feasibility:
      1. Political Feasibility:
    • 1.6 Risk assessment strategy
    • 1.7 Significance of the project
    • 1.8 Project Scheduling
  • Chapter
    • 2.1 Background (Overview)
    • 2.2 Overall Description of Software Requirements
    • 2.3 General Constraints
    • 2.3.1 Software constraints
    • 2.3.2 Hardware Constraints
    • 2.3.3 Assumptions and Dependencies
    • 2.4 Specific Requirements
    • 2.4.1 User requirements
    • 2.5 External Interface requirements
    • 2.5.1 User Interfaces
    • 2.6 Essential use case Diagrams
  • Actors:
  • Use Cases:
  • Dependencies:
  • Use Case Descriptions:
  • Chapter
    • 3.1 System Use Case Diagram
    • 3.2 Sequence Diagrams
    • 3.3 Activity Diagrams

Chapter 1

Overall Description

These include features such as patient registration and scheduling, electronic medical records (EMRs), billing and payment processing, inventory management. EMRs are digital versions of a patient's medical record that can be accessed by authorized healthcare providers. They include information such as medical history, test results, and treatment plans. Prescription mechanisms can be a part of an EMR or a separate system altogether. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) systems allow doctors to send prescriptions directly to pharmacies, reducing errors and increasing efficiency. Overall, hospital management systems can help improve patient care, streamline administrative tasks, and reduce costs. They can also help hospitals comply with regulations and maintain accurate records

1.1. Introduction

Before the advent of modern computer-based hospital management systems, many hospitals used manual systems for patient registration, appointment scheduling, and prescription management. These systems were typically paper-based and often involved creating lists to keep track of patient information. Hospitals are an essential part of the health-care system, and having a competent online hospital management system is a must in today's environment. Patients, doctors, and hospital administrators can all benefit from this Hospital Management System, which is designed to give a faster and more efficient response to their diverse demands.

1.1.1 Background of the organization

The hospital is a critical institution that plays a vital role in providing healthcare services to the community. As part of its commitment to improving patient care and enhancing operational efficiency, the hospital has initiated a project to implement a modern online hospital management system. The organizational vision is to become a world-class healthcare provider that offers patient-centered care, fosters innovation, and promotes excellence in research and education. The mission is to provide high-quality, compassionate, and accessible

Whiteboards: Hospitals used to write patient appointment information on a whiteboard, which would include the patient's name, appointment time, and doctor. The board would be updated throughout the day as appointments were added or changed. Spreadsheet: Some hospitals used spreadsheets to schedule patient appointments. The spreadsheet would include the patient's name, appointment time, and doctor, and staff would manually update the spreadsheet as needed.

Prescription management

Hospitals used to write out prescriptions by hand, which would then be filed and tracked manually. This often led to errors, such as illegible handwriting, and made it difficult to track patients' medication histories. Some of the manual patient prescription systems that hospitals used to use: Handwritten prescriptions: Hospitals used to write out prescriptions by hand, which would then be filed and tracked manually. This often led to errors, such as illegible handwriting, and made it difficult to track patients' medication histories. Medication administration record (MAR) sheets: Hospitals would keep track of patients' medications using MAR sheets, which would include the patient's name, medication name, dosage, and frequency. Staff would manually update the sheet as medications were administered. Pharmacy dispensing logs: Hospitals used to keep track of medications dispensed to patients using pharmacy dispensing logs. These logs would include the patient's name, medication name, dosage, and frequency. Pharmacy staff would manually update the log as medications were dispensed. Medication administration chart (MA chart): Some hospitals used MA charts to keep track of patients' medications. The chart would include the patient's name, medication name, dosage, and frequency. Staff would manually update the chart as medications were administered. Overall, these manual systems were often time-consuming and error-prone. The advent of modern computer-based hospital management systems is a necessary for patient registration, appointment scheduling, and prescription management for its much more efficient and accurate mechanism.

1.1.3 Statement of The Problem

Problem 1: Manual Patient Registration System:

The existing problem is that hospitals are relying on manual patient registration systems, such as paper forms, index cards, and ledgers. These systems are time- consuming and prone to errors, such as incomplete or inaccurate patient information. This can lead to delays in patient care and miscommunication among healthcare professionals. The problem has arisen because hospitals have been slow to adopt modern technology for patient registration. This has resulted in inefficient and outdated processes that are not well-suited for the demands of a modern healthcare system. Positive consequences of adopting a computer-based patient registration system include increased efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of patient information. This will lead to faster and more effective patient care, improved communication among healthcare professionals, and better tracking of patient medical history. Patients will also benefit from the convenience of online registration and the ability to update their information online. Negative consequences of not addressing this problem include continued inefficiencies in patient registration, increased risk of errors and miscommunication, and potential delays in patient care. This could lead to a decrease in patient satisfaction and trust in the hospital.

Problem 2: Manual Appointment Scheduling System:

The existing problem is that hospitals are using manual appointment scheduling systems, such as paper-based calendars, appointment books, whiteboards, and spreadsheets. These systems are prone to errors, such as double-booking or missing appointments, and can result in delays in patient care and frustration among patients and staff. The problem has arisen because hospitals have been slow to adopt modern technology for appointment scheduling. This has resulted in inefficient and outdated processes that are not well-suited for the demands of a modern healthcare system. Positive consequences of adopting a computer-based appointment scheduling system include increased efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of appointment information. This will lead to faster and more effective patient care, improved communication among healthcare professionals, and better tracking of patient appointments. Patients will also benefit from the convenience of online scheduling and the ability to easily reschedule appointments.

1.1.4 Proposed System

Alternative Solution 1: Online Patient Self-Registration System:

An alternative solution to the existing manual patient registration system is an online patient self-registration system. This system would allow patients to register themselves online using a secure web portal. Patients would enter their personal information, medical history, and reason for the visit, and the information would be automatically entered into the hospital's database. This would eliminate the need for paper forms and manual data entry, saving time and reducing errors. Patients could also update their information online, reducing the need for staff to manually update patient records.

Complementary Solution 1: Digital Signature System:

A complementary solution to the online patient self-registration system could be a digital signature system that allows patients to electronically sign consent forms and other documents. This would eliminate the need for paper forms and manual signatures, saving time and reducing errors.

Alternative Solution 2: Computer-Based Appointment

Scheduling System:

An alternative solution to the existing manual appointment scheduling system is a computer-based appointment scheduling system. This system would allow patients to schedule appointments online using a secure web portal. Patients could select their preferred date and time, and the system would automatically update the hospital's appointment calendar. This would eliminate the need for paper-based calendars, appointment books, and whiteboards, saving time and reducing errors. Staff could also easily view and manage appointments online, reducing the risk of double- booking or missing appointments.

Complementary Solution 2: Automated Appointment

Reminder System:

A complementary solution to the computer-based appointment scheduling system could be an automated appointment reminder system that sends patients text or email reminders of their upcoming appointments. This would reduce the risk of missed appointments and improve patient satisfaction.

Alternative Solution 3: Electronic Prescription Management

System:

An alternative solution to the existing manual prescription management system is an electronic prescription management system. This system would allow healthcare professionals to electronically prescribe medications using a secure web portal. The system would automatically update the patient's medication record, reducing the risk of errors and adverse drug events. Pharmacy staff could also easily view and manage medication orders online, reducing the risk of dispensing errors.

Complementary Solution 3: Medication Bar-code Scanning

System:

A complementary solution to the electronic prescription management system could be a medication bar-code scanning system that allows healthcare professionals to scan medication bar-codes to verify the correct medication and dosage before administering it to the patient. This would reduce the risk of medication errors and adverse drug events.

1.2 Objective

1.2.1 General Objective

The general objective is to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of patient care in hospitals by implementing a modern computer-based hospital management system. This system should address the existing problems of manual patient registration, appointment scheduling, and prescription management systems by providing alternative solutions such as online patient self-registration, computer-based appointment scheduling, and electronic prescription management systems. Complementary solutions such as digital signature systems, automated appointment reminder systems, and medication bar-code scanning systems should also be considered to enhance the effectiveness of the system. The ultimate goal is to enhance patient satisfaction, improve communication among healthcare professionals, and increase patient safety and trust in the hospital.

1.2.2 Specific Objective

Specific Objective: The objective of this project is to develop and implement a computer-based hospital management system that addresses the following questions:

  1. Prescription Management: The electronic prescription management system will be deployed to replace the manual prescription management system. The project will be limited to the hospital's internal operations and will not cover external interfaces such as insurance companies, laboratories, and pharmacies. The project will also not cover the development of new medical procedures or the acquisition of new medical equipment. The system requirements that will be satisfied under this project include:
  2. The system should be user-friendly, secure, and compliant with all relevant regulations and standards.
  3. The system should allow for the easy management and tracking of patient information, appointment scheduling, and prescription management.
  4. The system should be able to generate reports and analytics to improve hospital operations and patient care. The boundary of the project will be limited to the development and implementation of the computer-based hospital management system. Maintenance and upgrades to the system will be covered under a separate project or maintenance plan. This Hospital Management System will be automated. Patients can register form their house and schedule doctor visits based on their medical symptoms. They can also place prescriptions, request an emergency admission, and view discharge summaries and bills. Doctors will have access to patient prescriptions and test results. Users can be registered, available doctors can be assigned for consultation.

1.3.2 Limitation

Limitations:

  1. Compatibility: The computer-based hospital management system may not be compatible with all existing software and hardware systems in the hospital. This could result in potential integration issues and compatibility errors.
  2. Portability: The system may not be easily portable to other healthcare settings or facilities, as it is designed to specifically meet the needs of the hospital in which it is implemented.
  3. Maintainability: The system may require regular maintenance and updates to ensure its continued functionality and compatibility. This could result in additional costs and resources needed to keep the system up-to-date.
  4. User Acceptability: The success of the system will depend on the acceptance and adoption of the system by hospital staff. User training and support will be crucial to ensure that staff members are comfortable and competent in using the system.
  5. Budget Constraints: The implementation of the computer-based hospital management system may require significant financial resources, which may not be available within the hospital's budget.

The system functionality that is not addressed in this version of the project due to constraints includes:

  1. Integration with external interfaces such as insurance companies, laboratories, and pharmacies.
  2. Electronic medical record management.
  3. Patient tracking and monitoring.
  4. Patient billing and payment management.
  5. Telemedicine and remote consultation services. These functionalities may be addressed in future versions of the project or through separate projects.

1.4 Methodology for the project

Project Methodology: The project will follow a phased development approach, starting with requirements gathering and analysis, followed by design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance. The Agile methodology will be used to manage the project, allowing for flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements. Software and Hardware Tools: The software and hardware tools that will be used in realizing the proposed project include:

  1. Programming Languages: The system will be developed using programming languages such as Java, Python, and JavaScript.
  2. Database Management System: The system will use a relational database management system (RDBMS) such as MySQL or PostgreSQL to store patient information, appointment scheduling, and prescription management data.
  3. Web Development Frameworks: The system will be developed using web development frameworks such as Django, Flask, or Ruby on Rails.
  4. Cloud Hosting Services: The system will be hosted on cloud infrastructure if they have one, if not alternative solutions such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure for scalability, availability, and security will be used.
  5. User Interface Design Tools: User interface design tools such as Adobe XD, Sketch, or Figma will be used to design and prototype the user interface.

The rationale behind each selection:

Primary data collection methods will include:

  1. Interviews: Interviews will be conducted with hospital staff, including doctors, nurses, and administrative staff, to gather their perspectives on the current hospital management systems and identify areas for improvement.
  2. Surveys: Surveys will be conducted with patients to gather their feedback on the hospital's current systems and identify areas for improvement.
  3. Focus Groups: Focus groups will be conducted with hospital staff and patients to gather their collective perspectives on the current systems and identify areas for improvement.

Secondary data collection methods will include:

  1. Literature Review: A literature review will be conducted to gather information on best practices and industry standards for hospital management systems.
  2. Case Studies: Case studies of successful hospital management system implementations will be reviewed to gather insights and lessons learned.
  3. Regulatory Standards: Regulatory standards and guidelines for hospital management systems will be reviewed to ensure compliance and identify best practices.

Requirement Elicitation Approaches:

The requirement elicitation approaches that will be used to gather data include:

  1. Joint Application Development (JAD): JAD sessions will be conducted with hospital staff and patients to identify system requirements and gather feedback on proposed solutions.
  2. Prototyping: Prototypes of the proposed system will be created and presented to hospital staff and patients to gather feedback and refine system requirements.
  3. Use Case Analysis: Use cases will be developed to identify system requirements and ensure that the proposed solutions meet the needs of hospital staff and patients. The type of information source will vary, depending on the data collection method used. Primary data sources will include hospital staff and patients, while secondary

data sources will include industry best practices, regulatory standards, and case studies. The information sources can be further classified as follows:

  1. Primary Data Sources:
    • Interviews: hospital staff and patients
    • Surveys: patients
    • Focus groups: hospital staff and patients
  2. Secondary Data Sources:
    • Literature review: industry best practices and standards
    • Case studies: successful hospital management system implementations
    • Regulatory standards: regulatory bodies and guidelines Overall, the combination of primary and secondary data collection methods and requirement elicitation approaches will ensure that the proposed hospital management system meets the needs of hospital staff and patients while also being compliant with industry standards and regulatory guidelines.

1.4.2 System Analysis and Design Approach

The system analysis and design approach for the proposed hospital management system will follow a structured and iterative process, consisting of the following phases:

  1. Requirements Gathering and Analysis: In this phase, the system requirements will be identified through the use of primary and secondary data collection methods. The gathered requirements will be analyzed and prioritized based on their importance to the hospital and their feasibility.
  2. System Design: In this phase, the system will be designed based on the gathered requirements. The system design will include the creation of system models, such as use case diagrams, activity diagrams, and sequence diagrams, to illustrate the system's functionality and behavior.
  3. Implementation: In this phase, the system will be developed based on the system design. The development will be done using appropriate programming languages, web development frameworks, and database management systems.
  4. Testing: In this phase, the system will be tested for functionality, usability, and performance. Testing will be done using a combination of manual and automated testing methods.
  5. Deployment: In this phase, the system will be deployed to the hospital's servers or cloud infrastructure. User training and support will also be provided to ensure that hospital staff are able to use the system effectively.
  6. Maintenance and Support: In this phase, the system will be maintained and supported to ensure its continued functionality and compatibility with new technologies and updates.
  1. Mobile Devices: Mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets may also be required to allow hospital staff to access the system remotely. The technology requirements are critical to the success of the proposed hospital management system. The software and hardware technologies selected should be reliable, secure, and scale-able, ensuring that the system can handle increasing traffic and maintain data security.

1.5 Feasibility Study

Feasibility Analysis: The proposed hospital management system will be evaluated for technical, operational, economic, legal, and political feasibility to determine its viability and potential for success.

  1. Technical Feasibility: Technical feasibility refers to the system's ability to meet the technical requirements and constraints. The proposed system is technically feasible, as the required software and hardware technologies are available and widely used in the industry. The development team has the necessary technical skills and expertise to design, develop, and deploy the system. The system can be easily integrated with existing hospital systems and infrastructure, and the cloud hosting infrastructure provides scalability and availability.
  2. Operational Feasibility: Operational feasibility refers to the system's ability to be integrated into the hospital's existing operations and processes. The proposed system is operationally feasible, as it is designed to streamline the hospital's operations and improve patient care. The system will be easy to use and accessible to hospital staff and patients. The system will be compatible with existing hospital systems, and staff training and support will be provided to ensure a smooth transition to the new system.
  3. Economic Feasibility: Economic feasibility refers to the system's ability to provide a positive return on investment. The proposed system is economically feasible, as it is expected to reduce costs and increase revenue for the hospital. The system will improve operational efficiency, reducing staff time and resources needed to manage patient information, appointments, and prescriptions. The system will also improve patient care, leading to increased patient satisfaction and loyalty.
  4. Legal Feasibility: Legal feasibility refers to the system's ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. The proposed system is legally feasible, as it will comply with all relevant healthcare regulations and standards, including patient privacy and data security regulations. The system will be designed with robust security features to

protect patient information from unauthorized access, and staff training and support will be provided to ensure compliance with all relevant regulations.

  1. Political Feasibility: Political feasibility refers to the system's ability to gain support from stakeholders, including hospital staff, patients, and regulatory bodies. The proposed system is politically feasible, as it is designed to improve patient care and streamline hospital operations, leading to increased satisfaction among hospital staff and patients. The system will also comply with all relevant regulations and standards, ensuring support from regulatory bodies. Overall, the proposed hospital management system is feasible from technical, operational, economic, legal, and political perspectives. The system is expected to improve hospital operations, reduce costs, increase revenue, and improve patient care, leading to a positive return on investment and increased stakeholder support.

1.6 Risk assessment strategy

Risk Assessment: The development of the proposed hospital management system is associated with several risks that could impact the project's success. The following are some of the expected risks associated with the project:

  1. Technical Risks: Technical risks include the possibility of software bugs, system incompatibility, and hardware failures. These risks could lead to system downtime and loss of data, resulting in project delays and increased costs.
  2. Schedule Risks: Schedule risks include the possibility of delays in the development process due to unforeseen circumstances such as staff turnover, resource constraints, or changes in requirements. These risks could result in missed project deadlines and increased costs.
  3. Security Risks: Security risks include the possibility of data breaches or system hacks. These risks could lead to the loss of sensitive patient information, resulting in legal and financial repercussions for the hospital.
  4. Financial Risks: Financial risks include the possibility of budget overruns, cost overruns, or failure to achieve a positive return on investment. These risks could result in project cancellation or reduced support from stakeholders.

Contingency Management Alternatives:

To mitigate these risks, the following contingency management alternatives are recommended: