

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
In-depth analysis of corruption in Africa and South America
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


In many regions, governance was decentralized, relying on kinship, clans, and traditional leaders. these systems worked locally, they did not create large-scale bureaucratic institutions, making the vulnerable to later exploitation.
The trans-Atlantic and Arab slave trades removed millions of people, destabilized societies, and ince warfare and betrayal. This created early patterns of bribery, coercion, and survival-driven corruption.
European powers divided Africa without regard for ethnic, cultural, or linguistic groups. These created long-term conflict, weakened nation-building, and fostered instability—a condition that allow corruption to flourish.
Colonial administrations built institutions designed for extraction rather than development: - Forced systems - Resource exploitation - Unequal taxation - Limited education and infrastructure
These systems laid the foundation for post-independence leaders to inherit extractive rather developmental governance structures.
Economic models focused heavily on exporting raw materials. Colonizers discouraged industrializatio entrepreneurship, and skilled local leadership. After independence, nations lacked the institutional capa to manage resources effectively.
Some colonial powers ruled through local chiefs, rewarding loyalty and punishing dissent. This no patronage, favoritism, and political manipulation—traits that echo in modern political corruption.
Pre-colonial societies often had strong communal accountability norms. Colonial systems replaced th with authoritarian governance, weakening cultural mechanisms that prevented abuse of power.
Because leaders inherited poorly designed political systems, struggles for control often led to conflicts, and manipulation of state resources. These conflicts further entrenched corruption as a political survival.
Historical overreliance on commodities (oil, minerals, cocoa, etc.) made economies vulnerable. Reso booms encouraged rent-seeking behavior, corruption, and neglect of diversification.
The combined historical disruptions weakened state formation, reduced trust in institutions, normalized extraction—creating conditions in which corruption and underdevelopment could thrive aft independence.