Introduction to Modern Algebra Assignment #3 - Peano Axioms & Natural Numbers (GU4041x), Lecture notes of Logic

The third assignment for the course 'introduction to modern algebra' (gu4041x). Students are asked to prove various properties related to the peano axioms and natural numbers, including uniqueness of elements not satisfying the axioms, the commutativity of addition, the lack of a greatest element in n, and the distributivity of multiplication over addition. The document also introduces the concept of a sequence of natural numbers and proves a property related to it using the axiom of induction.

Typology: Lecture notes

2015/2016

Uploaded on 10/10/2016

paulmfinger
paulmfinger 🇺🇸

4

(2)

6 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Mathematics GU4041x
Introduction to Modern Algebra
Assignment #3
Due September 26, 2016
In what follows, you may assume anything stated in class except what is being asked: notably, you
may use the associative, commutative, and distributive properties of multiplication.
1. Recall that the three Peano axioms, as stated in class, were roughly: (P1) 0 is not a successor;
(P2) the successor function is injective; (P3) the axiom of induction. For each i= 1,2,3,
define a set Ni, an element 0i, and a function fi:NiNi, and prove that it does not satisfy
the ith Peano axiom but does satisfy the other two. Are such sets unique in the same way
that Nis?
2. (Ex 2 from class) Prove that for all x, y, z N,x+z=y+zimplies x=y.
3. (Ex 3 from class) Prove that for all xN,x < x0.
4. The well-ordering principle says that every nonempty subset of Ncontains a least element.
Prove that this element is unique.
5. Prove that Nhas no greatest element, that is, no element greater than or equal to every
element of N.
6. Prove that for all x, y, z N,yzimplies xy xz.
7. For x, y N, propose a rule to define xysimilar to those for x+yand x·ygiven in class. (You
don’t have to prove that it exists, though it would follow the argument for x+ystraightfor-
wardly.)
8. Asequence of natural numbers is just a function a:NN. Its values a(i) are frequently
denoted ai. For example, ai=i2+ 1. For such a sequence, we may define Pn
i=0 aiby the rule
P0
i=0 ai=a0,
Pn0
i=0 ai= (Pn
i=0 ai) + an0
and then use the axiom of induction to prove that this assigns an unique value to Pn
i=0 ai.
Assuming this, use the axiom of induction to prove that 2Pn
i=0 i=n2+n. (You may assume
the standard notation 1 = 00, 2 = 1 + 1 = 000,n2=n·n, and so on.)

Partial preview of the text

Download Introduction to Modern Algebra Assignment #3 - Peano Axioms & Natural Numbers (GU4041x) and more Lecture notes Logic in PDF only on Docsity!

Mathematics GU4041x

Introduction to Modern Algebra

Assignment # Due September 26, 2016

In what follows, you may assume anything stated in class except what is being asked: notably, you may use the associative, commutative, and distributive properties of multiplication.

  1. Recall that the three Peano axioms, as stated in class, were roughly: (P1) 0 is not a successor; (P2) the successor function is injective; (P3) the axiom of induction. For each i = 1, 2 , 3, define a set Ni, an element 0i, and a function fi : Ni → Ni, and prove that it does not satisfy the ith Peano axiom but does satisfy the other two. Are such sets unique in the same way that N is?
  2. (Ex 2 from class) Prove that for all x, y, z ∈ N, x + z = y + z implies x = y.
  3. (Ex 3 from class) Prove that for all x ∈ N, x < x′.
  4. The well-ordering principle says that every nonempty subset of N contains a least element. Prove that this element is unique.
  5. Prove that N has no greatest element, that is, no element greater than or equal to every element of N.
  6. Prove that for all x, y, z ∈ N, y ≤ z implies xy ≤ xz.
  7. For x, y ∈ N, propose a rule to define xy^ similar to those for x + y and x · y given in class. (You don’t have to prove that it exists, though it would follow the argument for x + y straightfor- wardly.)
  8. A sequence of natural numbers is just a function a : N → N. Its values a(i) are frequently denoted ai. For example, ai = i^2 + 1. For such a sequence, we may define

∑n i=0 ai^ by the rule  

i=0 ai^ =^ a^0 , ∑n′ i=0 ai^ = (

∑n i=0 ai) +^ an′

and then use the axiom of induction to prove that this assigns an unique value to

∑n i=0 ai. Assuming this, use the axiom of induction to prove that 2

∑n i=0 i^ =^ n

(^2) + n. (You may assume the standard notation 1 = 0′, 2 = 1 + 1 = 0′′, n^2 = n · n, and so on.)