Immunological Techniques - Lecture Notes | Environ 3, Study notes of Environmental Science

Material Type: Notes; Class: HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS; Subject: Environmental Health, Science, and Policy; University: University of California - Irvine; Term: Unknown 2003;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/17/2009

koofers-user-yhp
koofers-user-yhp 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Real-time imaging of lymphocytes in vivo
Michael D Cahalan
y
, Ian Parker
z
, Sindy H Wei
and Mark J Miller
New preparations, fluorescent probes and imaging techniques
are providing the means to observe the behavior of cells in the
tissue environment of lymphoid organs. In particular, when
combined with two-photon laser microscopy, intravital imaging
of surgically exposed lymph nodes provides a unique view of
lymphocyte migration and antigen presentation as it occurs
within the living animal. The view is emerging that lymphocytes
migrate randomly within lymphoid organs, and that lymphocyte
contact with antigen-presenting cells may be a stochastic
process rather than one guided by chemokine gradients.
Addresses
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California,
Irvine, California 92697, USA
y
z
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California,
Irvine, California 92697, USA
Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15:372–377
This review comes from a themed issue on
Immunological techniques
Edited by Ronald N Germain
0952-7915/$ see front matter
ß2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI 10.1016/S0952-7915(03)00079-7
Abbreviations
APC antigen-presenting cell
DC dendritic cell
Introduction
The immune system consists of a distributed network of
trillions of cells that must operate independently to
provide antigen specificity and yet function in a coordi-
nated manner to defend us from a wide variety of patho-
gens. Communication between cells can be initiated by
direct cell contact, or can take place at some distance
within the tissue environment via chemokines.
Over the past 20 years, remarkable progress in molecular
immunology has defined the mechanism of antigen recog-
nition and identified a growing cast of molecules and
signaling pathways that link the T-cell receptor to the
nucleus. However, we still understand very little about
the basics of motility, compartmentalization and antigen
recognition in vivo, because these events occur within
densely packed lymphoid organs [1–3]. How do T cells, B
cells and dendritic cells (DCs) move within the native
tissue environment? How are T and B cell compartmental
boundaries established and maintained? How does a
T cell locate antigen within the lymph node by
following chemokine gradients or by random collisions
with antigen-presenting cells (APCs)?
There is increasing recognition that eventsdefined in vitro
may not correspond to the physiological situation in vivo
[4]. For example, contact between a T cell and an APC
leads to a redistributionof surface molecules and formation
of the ‘immunological synapse’ [5–7]. This type of mole-
cular redistribution has also been studied in vitro in planar
lipid bilayers with defined molecular constituents. Yet it is
still unclear whether stable synapses occur in the environ-
ment of the lymph node, or whether antigen recognition
naturally involves short-lived serial encounters.
Lymphoid organs have remained a black box into which
defined cell populations can be induced to home, but
from which we have been able to obtain only ‘snapshot’
views, by extracting cells or analyzing fixed tissue.
Clearly, there exists a strong need for imaging approaches
to visualize living cells within intact lymphoid tissue.
Seeing T cells in their native environment:
new preparations for imaging
To illuminate the black box of the tissue environment,
new in vitro preparations have been developed that more
faithfully represent the native tissue environment of
intact lymphoid organs. These include 3D collagen gel
matrices [8], monolayers of endothelial cells (ECs) bathed
with flowing solution to mimic the forces experienced by
cells [9], cultures of clusters or reaggregated tissue frag-
ments [10
,11], engineered tissue surrogates [12],and
whole lymph node explants (Figure 1;[13,14

,15

]).
All of these preparations lack intactvascular and lymphatic
vessels, and therefore cannot be applied to investigate
processes such as lymphocyte trafficking. Furthermore,
the lack of blood and lymphatic vessels may disrupt the
distribution of important soluble factors or alter the phy-
siological levels of tissue oxygenation.
To overcome this limitation, several promising methodol-
ogies have been developed to visualize cells within the
in vivo tissue environment. Non-invasive methods include
bioluminescence imaging of cells engineered to express
luciferase [16], magnetic resonance imaging microscopy
to track cells labeled with superparamagnetic particles
[17], and positron-emission tomography (PET; [18]).
Although these methods can be applied to intact animals,
all three require cell engineering to derive populations
that can be detected and presently lack single-cell resolu-
tion. Instead, optical techniques offer cellular, and even
sub-cellular, levels of resolution. Intravital preparations of
372
Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15:372–377 www.current-opinion.com
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Immunological Techniques - Lecture Notes | Environ 3 and more Study notes Environmental Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Real-time imaging of lymphocytes in vivo

Michael D Cahalan

y

, Ian Parker

z

, Sindy H Wei

and Mark J Miller

New preparations, fluorescent probes and imaging techniques

are providing the means to observe the behavior of cells in the

tissue environment of lymphoid organs. In particular, when

combined with two-photon laser microscopy, intravital imaging

of surgically exposed lymph nodes provides a unique view of

lymphocyte migration and antigen presentation as it occurs

within the living animal. The view is emerging that lymphocytes

migrate randomly within lymphoid organs, and that lymphocyte

contact with antigen-presenting cells may be a stochastic

process rather than one guided by chemokine gradients.

Addresses  Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA y e-mail: [email protected] zDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California,

Irvine, California 92697, USA

Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15 :372–

This review comes from a themed issue on Immunological techniques Edited by Ronald N Germain

0952-7915/$ – see front matter ß 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI 10.1016/S0952-7915(03)00079-

Abbreviations APC antigen-presenting cell

DC dendritic cell

Introduction

The immune system consists of a distributed network of

trillions of cells that must operate independently to

provide antigen specificity and yet function in a coordi-

nated manner to defend us from a wide variety of patho-

gens. Communication between cells can be initiated by

direct cell contact, or can take place at some distance

within the tissue environment via chemokines.

Over the past 20 years, remarkable progress in molecular

immunology has defined the mechanism of antigen recog-

nition and identified a growing cast of molecules and

signaling pathways that link the T-cell receptor to the

nucleus. However, we still understand very little about

the basics of motility, compartmentalization and antigen

recognition in vivo, because these events occur within

densely packed lymphoid organs [1–3]. How do T cells, B

cells and dendritic cells (DCs) move within the native

tissue environment? How are T and B cell compartmental

boundaries established and maintained? How does a

T cell locate antigen within the lymph node — by

following chemokine gradients or by random collisions

with antigen-presenting cells (APCs)?

There is increasing recognition that events defined in vitro

may not correspond to the physiological situation in vivo

[4]. For example, contact between a T cell and an APC

leads to a redistribution of surface molecules and formation

of the ‘immunological synapse’ [5–7]. This type of mole-

cular redistribution has also been studied in vitro in planar

lipid bilayers with defined molecular constituents. Yet it is

still unclear whether stable synapses occur in the environ-

ment of the lymph node, or whether antigen recognition

naturally involves short-lived serial encounters.

Lymphoid organs have remained a black box into which

defined cell populations can be induced to home, but

from which we have been able to obtain only ‘snapshot’

views, by extracting cells or analyzing fixed tissue.

Clearly, there exists a strong need for imaging approaches

to visualize living cells within intact lymphoid tissue.

Seeing T cells in their native environment:

new preparations for imaging

To illuminate the black box of the tissue environment,

new in vitro preparations have been developed that more

faithfully represent the native tissue environment of

intact lymphoid organs. These include 3D collagen gel

matrices [8], monolayers of endothelial cells (ECs) bathed

with flowing solution to mimic the forces experienced by

cells [9], cultures of clusters or reaggregated tissue frag-

ments [

,11], engineered tissue surrogates [12], and

whole lymph node explants (Figure 1; [13,

]).

All of these preparations lack intact vascular and lymphatic

vessels, and therefore cannot be applied to investigate

processes such as lymphocyte trafficking. Furthermore,

the lack of blood and lymphatic vessels may disrupt the

distribution of important soluble factors or alter the phy-

siological levels of tissue oxygenation.

To overcome this limitation, several promising methodol-

ogies have been developed to visualize cells within the

in vivo tissue environment. Non-invasive methods include

bioluminescence imaging of cells engineered to express

luciferase [16], magnetic resonance imaging microscopy

to track cells labeled with superparamagnetic particles

[17], and positron-emission tomography (PET; [18]).

Although these methods can be applied to intact animals,

all three require cell engineering to derive populations

that can be detected and presently lack single-cell resolu-

tion. Instead, optical techniques offer cellular, and even

sub-cellular, levels of resolution. Intravital preparations of

Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15 :372–377 www.current-opinion.com

exposed lymphoid organs permit light microscopic imag-

ing in the native tissue environment with intact circula-

tory elements, but require anesthesia and surgery to bring

objective lenses close enough to the tissue.

To image cells at depths of more than about 50 mm, two-

photon microscopy is the technique of choice. When

combined with fluorescent probes, confocal microscopy or two-photon microscopy can reveal single cells at the plane of focus, either by imaging through a pinhole in the case of confocal microscopy, or by selectively exciting the fluorophore only at the plane of focus in the case of two- photon microscopy. Recently, we provided a detailed comparison of confocal and two-photon microscopy as

Figure 1

Z

Y

X

Model system Strengths Weaknesses

2D, important

native environmental

factors are missing,

non-native morphology.

High spatial and

temporal resolution,

control over molecular

interactions.

Planar lipid bilayer

Solution exchange is

difficult, may not mimic

secondary lymphoid

tissues.

Realistic morphology

and 3D behavior,

mimics natural peripheral

tissue substrate.

3D collagen gels

Missing physiological

blood flow and tissue

signals.

Permits adhesive and

transmigration behaviors

to be analyzed on a

physiologic substrate

under conditions of flow.

EC monolayer under flow

Lacking physiological

extracellular substrates

and long-range

environmental factors.

Preserves the immediate

microenvironment, for

example, cell to cell

contacts and short

range factors.

Reaggregates and clusters

Lacking lymphatic

inputs and normal

blood flow.

3D tissue environment,

physiological substrates,

natural cell to cell

interactions, long- and short-

range environmental effects.

Lymphoid tissue explants

True physiological Technically difficult.

environment.

Intravital preparation

Current Opinion in Immunology

The strengths and weaknesses of model systems in current use for the real-time imaging of lymphocytes. EC, endothelial cell.

In vivo imaging of lymphocytes Cahalan et al. 373

www.current-opinion.com Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15 :372– 377

genes, secretion of cytokines and cell proliferation. Two

different approaches have been used to visualize changes

in T-cell dynamics evoked by antigen. When antigen-

specific T cells were transferred into animals that had

been injected subcutaneously with specific antigen, clus- ters and swarms of enlarged T cells were observed one day following adoptive transfer [

]. At later times, cells divided and resumed a vigorous pattern of motility. Using

Figure 3

(a)

(b)

Current Opinion in Immunology

Intravital two-photon images of T cells in the inguinal lymph node of an anesthetized mouse. (a) Trajectories of four separate cells at varying times. The

colors represent cells at different depths, ranging from 100 to 150 mm below the surface of the lymph node, with blue representing the bottom and red the top of the imaging volume. Scale bar: 25 mm. (b) T cells (green), vessels and fibers (both red) labeled via tail vein injection with

tetramethylrhodamine dextran. Scale bar: 50 mm.

In vivo imaging of lymphocytes Cahalan et al. 375

www.current-opinion.com Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15 :372– 377

an alternative method of antigen priming, in which APCs

were differentiated in vitro from bone marrow cells,

pulsed with antigen and then injected subcutaneously,

Stoll et al. [

] observed contact between T cells and

APCs that lasted >15 hours in a one-to-one pattern of

association.

Recently, we have pursued an in vivo labeling method to

visualize antigen-primed DCs interacting with CD þ T

cells (MJ Miller, SH Wei, I Parker, MD Cahalan, unpub-

lished data). If the T cells can be likened to swimming fish,

DCs behave effectively as nets; they make contact with T

cells by throwing out long membrane tethers and rapidly

reeling them back in, constantly changing their shape and

greatly expanding their capture radius. It appears from

these early studies that the initial encounter between a T

cell and a DC relies upon dynamic cell behaviors that are

finely tuned to optimize the chance of random collisions.

Conclusions

Two-photon microscopy represents an optimal technique

for tracking the behavior of living cells deep within the

tissue environment. It is already feasible to image T cells

and other cells of the immune system within the circula-

tion, or in the tissue environment of lymph node, spleen,

Peyer’s patch, thymus and peripheral tissues. Video pre-

sentations of the data demonstrate the dynamic behavior

of T cells and B cells as they migrate within the lymph

node, and of DCs as they interact with T cells during

antigen presentation. Two-photon imaging will be adap-

table to a wide variety of new probes for second messen-

gers and gene expression, and to a broad range of

processes both physiological and pathological. Combined

with intravital imaging of surgically exposed lymphoid

organs, two-photon imaging is providing a unique view of

lymphocyte dynamics in vivo.

Update

A recent study used two-photon microscopy to examine the

interaction of dendritic cells labeled in vitro with motile

CD þ T cells in an explanted lymph node preparation

[

]. T cells made stable, long-lasting contacts with

antigen-pulsed DCs, rather than a series of short contacts.

References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

 (^) of special interest  (^) of outstanding interest

  1. Gretz JE, Anderson AO, Shaw S: Cords, channels, corridors and conduits: critical architectural elements facilitating cell interactions in the lymph node cortex. Immunol Rev 1997, 156 :11-24.

  2. Gretz JE, Norbury CC, Anderson AO, Proudfoot AE, Shaw S: Lymph-borne chemokines and other low molecular weight molecules reach high endothelial venules via specialized conduits while a functional barrier limits access to the lymphocyte microenvironments in lymph node cortex. J Exp Med 2000, 192 :1425-1440. 3. Cyster JG: Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science 1999, 286 :2098-2102. 4. Jenkins MK, Khoruts A, Ingulli E, Mueller DL, McSorley SJ, Reinhardt RL, Itano A, Paper KA: In vivo activation of antigen- specific CD4 T cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2001, 19 :23-45. 5. Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, Davis MM, Shaw AS, Allen PM, Dustin ML: The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999, 285 :221-227. 6. Dustin ML, de Fougerolles AR: Reprogramming T cells: the role of extracellular matrix in coordination of T cell activation and migration. Curr Opin Immunol 2001, 13 :286-290. 7. Dustin ML, Allen PM, Shaw AS: Environmental control of immunological synapse formation and duration. Trends Immunol 2001, 22 :192-194. 8. Gunzer M, Schafer A, Borgmann S, Grabbe S, Zanker KS, Brocker EB, Kampgen E, Friedl P: Antigen presentation in extracellular matrix: interactions of T cells with dendritic cells are dynamic, short lived, and sequential. Immunity 2000, 13 :323-332. 9. Kantele JM, Kurk S, Juntila MA: Effects of continuous exposure to stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha on T cell rolling and tight adhesion to monolayers of activated endothelial cells. J Immunol 2000, 164 :5035-5040.



Bousso P, Bhakta NR, Lewis RS, Robey E: Dynamics of thymocyte-stromal cell interactions visualized by two-photon microscopy. Science 2002, 296 :1876-1880. Two-photon microscopy was employed to image motility of and inter- actions between thymocytes and stromal cells in a reaggregated thymic organ culture system during positive selection.

  1. Hommel M, Kyewski B: Dynamic changes during the immune response in T cell-antigen-presenting cell clusters isolated from lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2003, 197 :269-280.

  2. Poznansky MC, Evans RH, Foxall RB, Olszak IT, Piascik AH, Hartman KE, Brander C, Meyer TH, Pykett MJ, Chabner KT et al.: Efficient generation of human T cells from a tissue-engineered thymic organoid. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18 :729-734.

  3. Tan JT, Dudl E, LeRoy E, Murray R, Sprent J, Weinberg KI, Surh CD: IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98 :8732-8737.



Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD: Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and dynamic antigen responses in intact lymph node. Science 2002, 296 :1869-1873. This paper introduces two-photon microscopy to examine lymphocyte motility and antigen responses in an explanted lymph node preparation. Highly motile T and B cells were observed and shown to have differing velocities in their respective compartments. Changes in response to antigen included T-cell enlargement, formation of stable clusters and swarms, and a resumption of vigorous motility following cell division.



Stoll S, Delon J, Brotz TM, Germain RN: Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 2002, 296 :1873-1876. Confocal imaging was used to image T cells interacting with DCs in explanted lymph node cultures. Naı¨ve T cells were reportedly immotile, and stable conjugates between T cells and APCs were observed.

  1. Contag CH, Bachmann MH: Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2002, 4 :235-260.

  2. Dodd SJ, Williams M, Suhan JP, Williams DS, Koretsky AP, Ho C: Detection of single mammalian cells by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Biophys J 1999, 76 :103-109.

  3. Dubey P, Su H, Adonai N, Du S, Rosato A, Braun J, Gambhir SS, Witte ON: Quantitative imaging of the T cell antitumor response by positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100 :1232-1237.



Cahalan MD, Parker I, Wei SH, Miller MJ: Two photon tissue imaging: seeing the immune response in a fresh light. Nature Reviews Immunology 2002, 2 :872-880. This review provides a technical description and a comparison of two- photon and confocal imaging methods applied to the immune system.

  1. Wei SH, Miller MJ, Cahalan MD, Parker I: Two-photon imaging in intact lymphoid tissue. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002, 512 :203-208.

376 Immunological techniques

Current Opinion in Immunology 2003, 15 :372– 377 www.current-opinion.com