Implication in Mathematics, Summaries of Mathematics

Logical Reasoning using Implications

Typology: Summaries

2023/2024

Uploaded on 01/19/2025

ronald-98
ronald-98 🇭🇰

1 document

1 / 17

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Simple Implications
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Implication in Mathematics and more Summaries Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Simple Implications

One of the examples we had previously proved as tautology is an example of a Simple Implication.

This Simple Implication is called Modus Ponens

If a car has a dead battery, then the car will not start. Jim’s car has a dead battery.

Example

Conclusion: Jim’s car will not start.

If two lines are parallel, then they do not

intersect. Line f is parallel to line m.

Conclusion: Lines f & m do not intersect.

Example

f

m

If you spend time with friends, then you enjoy yourself. If you enjoy yourself, then your time is well spent.

Example

Conclusion: If you spend time with friends, then your time is well spent.

If two planes are not parallel, then they intersect. If two planes intersect, then they intersect in a line.

If two planes are not parallel, then they intersect in a line.

Example

Simple Implications

are tautologies that are very useful and

often used.

Other Simple Implications

Modus Tollens – the process of denying the

consequent

[(p → q) ∧ ~ p+ → ~ p

Simplification

(p ∧ q) → p

Equivalence Implications

are also tautologies often used to

validate statements

De Morgan’s Law

the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction

of the negations; and the negation of a

conjunction is the disjunction of the negations;

∼(p∧q)↔(∼p∨∼q)

∼(p∨q)↔(∼p∧∼q)

Other Equivalence Implications

Idempotent Law

(p ∧ p) ↔ p (p ∨ p) ↔ p

Double Negation

p ↔ ~ (~ p)

Contraposition

(p → q) ↔ (~ q →~ p)

Other Equivalence Implications

Equivalence for Implication and Disfunction

(p → q) ↔ (~ p∨ ~ q)

Negation for Implication

~ (p → q) ↔ ( p∧ ~ q)

Biconditional Sentences (p ↔ q)↔(p → q)∧(q → p)+ (p↔q)↔(p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p∧ ~ q)]