In time Reflection Paper - Reflective Summary, Essays (high school) of Philosophy

Just a simple reflective summary of the In time movie

Typology: Essays (high school)

2019/2020

Available from 08/17/2021

kitsune-plays
kitsune-plays 🇵🇭

6 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
In Time (2011)
Directed by: Andrew Niccol
Sci-Fi, Action
Movie review written by: Diosette Polinne Fabularum
In Time (2011)
Directed by: Andrew Niccol
Sci-Fi, Action
Tick, tock. Time is running out, especially to those of low social classes. To prevent the
disruption of the system and to stop the people from turning into the desire-driven horde, it is the clock
that keeps things stable. You can choose to simply go about your life, or maybe prolong it or even
become an immortal?
Set in a futuristic dystopian theme, “In Time” is a movie where time is an essential part of
people’s lives. People are grouped depending on their social classes by different districts and time
zones. The protagonist, Will Salas (played by Justin Timberlake) is a 28-year-old whose clock started, just
like everyone else in the film, when he turned 25. He and his mom, Rachel (played by Olivia Wilde) live
in the ghettos of Dayton, an industrial-looking time zone where people are having a hard time scraping
off time. He has managed to collect a few years at his age, however, the cost of living in the ghetto only
went up day by day. While Salas was out drinking with his friend, there he met Henry Hamilton, a
wealthy man who purposely flashed his eye-catching time in the bar. Local time thugs suddenly
appeared and wanted the wealthy man’s time for themselves. Rather than retreating like his friend
Borel told him to do, he waited for an opportunity to save the rich stranger. However, saving the life of
the man was all for naught since he was planning to die after living for so many years already. The
stranger decides to give all of his time to Will while allowing some remaining time on him to run out
while sitting on a bridge. The protagonist then heads to the wealthiest time zone, The “New
Greenwich”. After winning a thousand worth of time in the casino he then meets Sylvia (played by
Amanda Seyfried), the daughter of Philippe Weis, an extremely wealthy and powerful personality in the
district who has been manipulating the poor by imposing high-interest time loans with each passing day.
Mr. Weis was a believer of “Darwinian capitalism” (or much commonly known as “Social Darwinism”, a
theory which also supports the concept of capitalism. It is all about competition, adaptation, variation,
overproduction, and speciation.), he has millions of years stored, enough to make him immortal.
However, his daughter Sylvia does not like the thought of living in the same setting for a long time. She
thinks that there is more to life than the favored existence she knows. She is interested in Salas’ wild
ideas of changing the unfair system which only favors the wealthy over the poor and allows a lot of
people to die just to achieve “immortality”. After taking Sylvia as a hostage when the timekeeper was
close to restraining him, it did not take too long when Sylvia agreed to Will’s propositions and it slowly
turned into their mutual crusade. They start robbing banks and providing the stolen time to the poor
that began to cripple the system and the down-and-out.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download In time Reflection Paper - Reflective Summary and more Essays (high school) Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

In Time (2011) Directed by: Andrew Niccol Sci-Fi, Action Movie review written by: Diosette Polinne Fabularum In Time (2011) Directed by: Andrew Niccol Sci-Fi, Action Tick, tock. Time is running out, especially to those of low social classes. To prevent the disruption of the system and to stop the people from turning into the desire-driven horde, it is the clock that keeps things stable. You can choose to simply go about your life, or maybe prolong it or even become an immortal? Set in a futuristic dystopian theme, “In Time” is a movie where time is an essential part of people’s lives. People are grouped depending on their social classes by different districts and time zones. The protagonist, Will Salas (played by Justin Timberlake) is a 28-year-old whose clock started, just like everyone else in the film, when he turned 25. He and his mom, Rachel (played by Olivia Wilde) live in the ghettos of Dayton, an industrial-looking time zone where people are having a hard time scraping off time. He has managed to collect a few years at his age, however, the cost of living in the ghetto only went up day by day. While Salas was out drinking with his friend, there he met Henry Hamilton, a wealthy man who purposely flashed his eye-catching time in the bar. Local time thugs suddenly appeared and wanted the wealthy man’s time for themselves. Rather than retreating like his friend Borel told him to do, he waited for an opportunity to save the rich stranger. However, saving the life of the man was all for naught since he was planning to die after living for so many years already. The stranger decides to give all of his time to Will while allowing some remaining time on him to run out while sitting on a bridge. The protagonist then heads to the wealthiest time zone, The “New Greenwich”. After winning a thousand worth of time in the casino he then meets Sylvia (played by Amanda Seyfried), the daughter of Philippe Weis, an extremely wealthy and powerful personality in the district who has been manipulating the poor by imposing high-interest time loans with each passing day. Mr. Weis was a believer of “Darwinian capitalism” (or much commonly known as “Social Darwinism”, a theory which also supports the concept of capitalism. It is all about competition, adaptation, variation, overproduction, and speciation.), he has millions of years stored, enough to make him immortal. However, his daughter Sylvia does not like the thought of living in the same setting for a long time. She thinks that there is more to life than the favored existence she knows. She is interested in Salas’ wild ideas of changing the unfair system which only favors the wealthy over the poor and allows a lot of people to die just to achieve “immortality”. After taking Sylvia as a hostage when the timekeeper was close to restraining him, it did not take too long when Sylvia agreed to Will’s propositions and it slowly turned into their mutual crusade. They start robbing banks and providing the stolen time to the poor that began to cripple the system and the down-and-out.

The movie started a portrayal of the injustices between social classes. Different views of Justice were observed throughout the movie. The protagonist’s view was more a utilitarian view of justice. He believes that inequality is unjust. The wealthy must contribute something to the poor. This was showed when he entered New Greenwich- “I must make them pay”. He believes that wealthy people should not have the right to be wealthy when people are dying each day in the ghetto. Other than that, in the succeeding scenes of the movie, he and Sylvia talked about which social class is at fault. He responded, “It’s nobody’s fault. What they’re born with” I believe what he meant is that it is in a person’s free will whether he/she wants to stay in his/her current state or he/she wants to progress. To sum it all up, the movie displays the second principle of justice of Rawls. Wherein, inequality is okay as long as there is fair equality of opportunity for all to reach offices or positions regardless of where they were born or what class they were born into, so on and so forth. Some people will have more political powers than others. Just like what is shown in the movie, the protagonist was born in an unfavorable environment, he was born as a low class. However, he can still access the other time zones as long as he works hard for it. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. No matter how hard they tried to steal those time, it was no use, the cost of living keeps getting higher and the higher social classes are still gaining money. Rawls' 2nd principle of Justice does not center on making the rich get richer, but to make sure the poor are better off than they have been in some other type of system- whatever inequality there is, that’s all we have to justify.