






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An introduction to individual differences in psychology, focusing on the assessment of psychological characteristics such as intelligence, personality, interest, and aptitude. It covers the nature of individual differences, methods of assessment including self-report, projective, and situational measures, and specific tests for intelligence, aptitude, and personality. The document also discusses the perspectives of psychodynamic, socio-cultural, humanistic, and trait theories in understanding personality.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 12
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!







Foundations of Psychology
Psychology Secondary Course
Notes
Individual Differences
It is often said that no two individuals are exact duplicates; they differ from each other in some way or the other. Hence the job of the psychologist is to identify and understand this uniqueness in individuals. Such a similarity or difference between persons reveals individual differences. It happens in our day-to-day life when we see people around us. A question comes to mind; how and why people appear similar or different to each other? For example when we think about their physical appearance, we often ask ourselves why some people have dark or fair complexion, why some people are tall and some are short, why some are thin and why some are very fat. When we think about their psychological characteristics we often come across people who are very talkative or less talkative, some laugh too much whereas others take much time even to smile, some are very friendly whereas some prefer to be alone. The present lesson tries to answer all such queries which can bother us in our everyday life. In psychology, these are called individual differences referring to the extent and kind of variations or similarities among people on some of the important psychological aspects such as intelligence, personality, interest, and aptitude. This lesson will also help us understand how to assess such similarities or variations among individuals.
After studying this lesson, you will be able to:
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
Individual Differences
It has been observed that if we collect information about people’s characteristics from a large sample and examine the pattern of distribution (as shown in Fig.-3.1) we find that a large majority of the people fall in the middle range while a small proportion lies in extreme categories. For example, most of the people fall in the category of average height and very few are very tall or very short. This holds true for many more characteristics including intelligence and other psychological attributes.
Fig. 3.1 Distribution of height of a large sample of persons
The fact that people are different from each other is a very common observation. The differences in psychological characteristics are often consistent and form a stable pattern. By ‘consistent’, we mean that people tend to show regularity in their behaviour and their patterns of behaviour do not change very frequently. This consistency and stability in behaviour is unique to every person. People develop their unique traits/ characteristics and patterns of behaviour due to their genetic make up and the environment in which they are brought up. Once we know these differences systematically we can utilize the capabilities of people efficiently for their healthy development. Knowing about the specific characteristics of a person is necessary in order to extend support and utilize his or her potential to optimal level.
Individual differences occur due to interaction of genetic and environmental factors. We inherit certain characteristics from our parents through genetic codes. The phenotype or the expressed forms of our characteristics depend on contributions of the socio-cultural environment. This is the reason why we are not exactly like our parents and our parents not exactly like our grandparents. We do share similarities with our parents in respect of many physical attributes like height, colour of eyes, shape of nose etc. We also inherit certain cognitive, emotional and other characteristics from our parents like intellectual competence, love for sport, creativity etc. However, our own characteristics develop largely by the support from the environment which we inhabit.
The environment is responsible as how we are reared, the kind of atmosphere at house, whether it is liberal or strict, the type of education that we get, what we learn from people, around us, books, cultural practices, peers, teachers and media All these aspects refer to ‘environment’ which help in developing our potentials.
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
Individual Differences
Finally, in order to be useful, an assessment tool should be standardized. Standardization involves establishing the procedure of administration of a test to all persons in the same way under the same conditions. It also involves establishing group norms so that an individual’s score can be compared with those of others in a defined group. It is very important because a test score is only a relative score. It does not provide an absolute value as found in physical measurement. Standardization ensures uniformity and objectivity in administration and makes the results interpretable.
Psychologists have developed tests to measure different human characteristics. In schools, we use achievement tests which measure what people have learnt. Psychologists frequently use tests of ability and personality. The tests of ability tell what an individual can do when he or she is at his/her best. Ability tests measure capacity as potential rather than achievement. Tests of intelligence and aptitude come under this category. Aptitude refers to the ability to learn a particular kind of skill required in a specific situation. Personality tests measure the characteristic ways of thinking, feeling or behaving.
You often come across the term intelligence in everyday life. We generally use this term whenever we find somebody doing something very good which goes beyond our expectation. Intelligence is one of the psychological terms used quite frequently in various settings (e.g. school). Who can be called ‘Intelligent’? The one who gets highest marks in exams? That person who earns many educational degrees? Is the doctor more intelligent, or the engineer or the lawyer or the artist? One may answer these questions in different ways depending on the meaning of intelligence. Intelligence is much more than getting degrees. Intelligence refers to “multifaceted abilities of people”. It gets expressed in many ways. It comes in many forms. Some people are good in studies, some are good in repairing machines, some are good in acting and some are great in sports. People are very good in one subject and average in some other. The most important thing is that ‘intelligence’ is ‘functional’. It is ‘used’ to do something and to achieve something.
Foundations of Psychology
Psychology Secondary Course
Notes
Individual Differences
In psychology, the term intelligence has been defined in many ways. One of the earliest definitions of intelligence was given by Binet and Simon in 1905 who defined it as the “ ability to judge well, to understand well, and to reason well ”. One of the most popular definitions of intelligence was given by Wechsler who defined it as “ the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with the environment ”.
Gardner defined intelligence as “ the ability or skill to solve problems or to fashion products which are valued within one or more cultural settings ”. He used the term ‘Multiple Intelligences’ and advocated that there are eight types of intelligences such as Linguistic, Logical-mathematical, Spatial, Musical, Bodily-kinaesthetic, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Naturalistic.
Though the first attempt to measure intelligence was made by Sir Francis Galton a more systematic approach was developed by Alfred Binet, a French Psychologist. In 1905, Binet gave the concept of Mental Age (MA) which refers to an individual’s level of mental development relative to the environment in which he/she lives. The term Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was first devised by William Stern, a German psychologist, in 1912. IQ is defined as mental age divided by chronological age, and multiplied by 100: (IQ = MA/CA × 100). For example if the mental of a child is 12 and his/her Chronological age is 8 then the IQ of the child would be 150. The intelligence test developed by Binet was revised subsequently and in 1916 the test was given the name of Stanford - Binet test of intelligence. One of the most popular and widely used tests of intelligence is Wechsler Scales of Intelligence. These scales have been designed for individuals of different age groups such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) for adults and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) for children between the age of 6 and 16 years.
Intelligence tests are of two kinds Individual test and Group test. An individual test of intelligence can be administered to a single individual at a given time whereas a group test is administered to more than one individual at a time. On the basis of nature of items, intelligence tests are Verbal, Non-verbal, and Performance Tests. A verbal test requires understanding of written words. Hence it can be administered to literate individuals only. In non-verbal test, pictures or illustrations are used as item of the test. Performance tests are made up of certain concrete tasks. Both non-verbal and performance tests can be administered to literate and illiterate individuals.
Foundations of Psychology
Psychology Secondary Course
Notes
Individual Differences
The term personality has been defined in diverse ways. Allport in 1937 gave a very popular definition of personality which is still referred to by scholars. According to him “personality is the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment”.
Psychologists have approached personality from different perspectives. Each of these perspectives explains some aspects of personality. Now let us study in brief about some of these perspectives:
I) The trait perspective tries to describe personality in terms of various traits. Some times the traits are grouped into clusters. These clusters are called “types”. For instance introversion and extraversion are two types of personality traits. II) The psychodynamic perspective calls attention to the unconscious needs and conflicts as well as the influence of earlier stages of development on our lives. Sigmund Freud, a noted psychologist, provided the core concepts for this perspective. III) The socio-cultural perspective highlights the importance of the social and cultural environment. In view of this theory, our personality and behaviour patterns are acquired through interaction with others and adoption of social and cultural norms. IV) The humanistic perspective emphasizes the enormous potential for freedom and growth present in each one of us. It is a view which is optimistic and emphasizes-on positive aspects of life and potentialities.
In the field of personality assessment the major focus is on the study of the nature and intensity of various characteristics, which are generally reflected through the behaviour of the individual in a given situation. Personality assessment measures are classified into three categories.
A. Objective or Self report measures of personality.
B. Projective or Indirect measures of personality. C. Situational measures of personality.
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
Individual Differences
A. Objective or Self-Report Measures of Personality
In measures of this kind, the person is asked to report about himself/herself on a set of statements organized in the form of a questionnaire or inventory. The nature of the statement can be either closed ended or open ended. In the case of closed ended statements, rating scales or optiional answers are given whereas in the case of open- ended statements, the person is free to describe himself or herself. A number of tests have been developed to assess different trait domains of personality. Some of the self-report measures of personality, which are widely used to assess personality, are being discussed below.
(i) Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness- Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO- PI-R): This test is currently one of the most popular personality assessment tools being used across the world. This test has been developed by Costa and McCrae (1992) and is based on Five-Factor Model of Personality. The test has been developed based on longitudinal studies over 15 years. It provides scores on five major dimensions of personality. These five dimensions and facets are as follows: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness.
(ii) Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF): This test was originally developed by Raymond B. Cattell, Karen Cattell and Heather E. P. Cattell in
(iii)In India a number of self- report measures of personality have been developed. Some of these modified versions are Bell Adjustment Inventory by Mohsim and Hussain, Maslow Security-Insecurity Inventory by Singh and Jamuar, Maudsley Personality Inventory of Eysenck in Hindi by Singh and Jodhpur Multiphasic Personality Inventory by Joshi and Malik, amongst others.
B. Projective or Indirect Measures of Personality
Projective or indirect measures of personality are widely used personality assessment tools. Unlike the self-report measures where the individual is provided with structured test stimuli, in projective tests the individual has to respond to unstructured or ambiguous stimuli. The basic assumption behind using unstructured test stimuli in projective tests is that the individual projects his/her latent or unconscious feelings, needs, emotions, motives etc. on to the ambiguous stimulus. The responses of the individual in the form of projection reflect the nature of his/her personality.
Foundations of Psychology
Notes
Individual Differences
which it assesses what it intends to assess. Standardization involves establishing the procedure of administration of a test to all persons in the same way under the same conditions.
Foundations of Psychology
Psychology Secondary Course
Notes
Individual Differences
3.
3.
3.